Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🚀 Стартап-кафе №1

@startup_cafe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

804subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193696943
TypeChannel
Username@startup_cafe
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/startup_cafe

Growth

804805804.56 August 2026 — 804 subscribers7 August 2026 — 804 subscribers7 August 2026 — 805 subscribers14 August 2026 — 804 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 804–805 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:16804-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:00805+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:02804no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:53804first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.82%
avg views ÷ 804 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held9 (26 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total123
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @startuppolyanaPhoto

Друзья, давно не виделись с вами в Community Steford Hub Приглашаем на практический лекторий "ИИ Автоматизация бизнеса." На встрече Community Steford Hub разберем, как превратить вашу бизнес-экспертизу в работающий ИИ-инструмент всего за 2 часа. Создание агентов и софта без программирования. Что вас ждет на встрече: - Философия вайбкодинга. Почему человеческий язык - это новый код в 20206 году; - Методология "из

30 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC31 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uncrn_sagePhoto

Участвую в такой конфе, так что велком: ИИ для психологической поддержки Приглашаем на ЛЕТЮЮ НЕНАПРЯЖНУЮ ОНЛАЙН КОНФЕРЕНЦИЮ — телеграм пространство и зум эфиры 1-9 августа 20:00 Орлов Алексей — психолог из красной поляны и еще 8 экспертов расскажут свой опыт и лайфхаки использования ИИ для психологии. ✅ Где ИИ может помочь в психологии, а где стоит обратиться к специалисту? ✅ Какими моделями и промтами пользова

27 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uncrn_sagePhoto

SPOT: Мастер-класс 2.08 | 18:00 Практикум: "Создание музыки с помощью нейросетей и её дистрибуция: от идеи до 150+ площадок" На практикуме мы разберём, как искусственный интеллект меняет процесс создания музыки и какие возможности открывает авторам, музыкантам, контент-мейкерам и всем, кто хочет попробовать себя в музыкальном творчестве. На примере создания реального трека участники увидят весь процесс от первого

❤‍🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC39 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uncrn_sagePhoto

Ждал Gemini 3.5 Pro. А Google выкатил 3.6 Flash. Зачам? В июне вышел Gemini 3.5 Flash, а умную Pro-версию обещали в июле. Все ждали главный флагман, однако вместо него Google неожиданно выкатил Gemini 3.6 Flash. Причина простая: автоматизация и кодинг сместились в сторону ИИ-агентов. Когда в работе участвуют одновременно несколько нейросетей, главных фактора два — скорость работы и четкое выполнение инструкций. Тя

20 Jun 2026, 17:35 UTC62 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uncrn_sagePhoto

Промпты в ИИ — всё. Ну или почти. Хватит писать 100-строчные «простыни» в Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude, которые модель всё равно забывает через пять минут или путает из-за эффекта Lost in the Middle. Эра классического промпт-инжиниринга уступает место Skills (Навыкам). Что такое Skill? Это модульный «плагин» для ИИ-агента, который лежит прямо в репозитории проекта (папка .agents/skills). Он содержит системные правила,

19 Jun 2026, 06:45 UTC57 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, 19 июня в Стефорде проведем комьюнити встречу «Как построить компанию (команду в компании) с оборотом 1 млрд рублей и почему одни стартапы получают инвестиции, а другие — нет?» «Воронка инновационных стартапов» и Стефорд проведут стартап-вечер в Красной Поляне. В первой части поговорим о пути стартапа «Рабочие руки» — от первых клиентов до оборота 1 млрд рублей. Во второй разберёмся, как инвесторы оценива

4 Jun 2026, 10:44 UTC57 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uncrn_sagePhoto

Позвали спикеромна конференцию Клуба Строителей в Сочи 🏙 11 июня обсудим одну из самых горячих тем для бизнеса сегодня — AI и нейросети 🤖 Одни предприниматели уже внедряют AI в продажи, маркетинг и управление командами, другие пока только наблюдают со стороны. Эксперты и предприниматели обсудят: ▪️как AI уже помогает бизнесу зарабатывать ▪️какие процессы можно автоматизировать уже сейчас ▪️где нейросети реально

28 May 2026, 15:00 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uncrn_sage

Завтра буду рассказывать о нейросетях в НАСС (Национальная Ассоциации Сертифицированных Советников): 📍 Ежегодная встреча НАСС: нетворкинг и лучшие практики Традиционно в конце мая НАСС проводит открытую встречу для участников рынка. В программе: • деловая часть • обсуждение партнерского взаимодействия • нетворкинг для поиска новых точек роста Приглашаю всех, кто стремится к сотрудничеству и обмену опытом! 🗓 Когд

❤‍🔥1

26 May 2026, 10:06 UTC46 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uncrn_sagePhoto

Пятница. Steford. Собрались с друзьями и провели прекрасное мероприятие. Показали как: - автоматизировать процессы нейросетями - создать лендинг голосом - создать видео голосом Показали разные инструменты. Благодарю за организацию и за активную аудиторию. Благодарю за вопросы. Зовите меня, зовите нас и многому научитесь. ❤‍🔥

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @startup_cafe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 975,694 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🚀 Стартап-кафе №1” (@startup_cafe), 804 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startup_cafe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.