Channel
@startexam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
565subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001262927586 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @startexam |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/startexam |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 565 | -3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 568 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 569 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 570 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 571 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 574 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 574 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
55 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 56.4% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 3.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 28 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Август закрывает сезон отпусков, и самое время собрать в один дайджест главные материалы месяца, которые стоит взять с собой в осенний рабочий ритм🌻 🧭 Оценка по профилям компетенций: новый стандарт управления развитием 📦 Встречайте Performance Review от StartExam 🎓Как StartExam помог автоматизировать КРЭШ для тысяч участников: опыт и инсайты для вузов.
❤1👍1
Готовимся к новым карьерным и бизнес-рывкам со StartExam!😌
❤3
Сделайте StartExam вашим главным рабочим лайфхаком!💪
🔥3
🚫 Три ошибки, которые убивают смысл Performance Review Performance Review задумывался как инструмент развития. Но в некоторых компаниях он превращается в галочку в чек-листе. Почему так происходит? 1. Формальный подход Когда встреча сводится к чтению готового отчета без диалога, сотрудник не понимает, как расти дальше. Оценка должна быть обсуждением, а не «судом» по KPI. 2. Подход "раз в год и забыли" Мир меняет…
❤3
Как превратить Performance Review в «лестницу роста»? Часто ревью заканчивается фразой «молодец, работаем дальше». Итог — человек уходит с размытым пониманием, куда расти и что менять. Правильный подход — сделать из результатов ревью пошаговый план развития: 1️⃣ Роли — зафиксировать, в какой позиции сотрудник сейчас и куда он может перейти. Это может быть расширение функций, переход в соседнюю роль или подготовка …
❤2
Встречайте новый стандарт оценки — Performance Review от StartExam! Теперь все, что касается роста и эффективности ваших сотрудников, доступно в одном окне: платформа Performance Review от StartExam объединяет результативность и потенциал, формирует матрицу талантов 9-box и дает персональные рекомендации по развитию. Вся логика оценки — от целей до ИПР и встреч 1-1 — автоматизирована и проста в настройке. Для кого…
❤3
Какой формат оценки результативности сотрудников вам кажется самым эффективным?
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что чаще всего мешает проводить Performance review в вашей компании?
The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие цели вы бы хотели решать с помощью Performance review?
The shares total 288%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Развивайте команду современными инструментами от StartExam!🌟
❤3
Июль позади, и мы стремительно и неумолимо приближаемся к последнему месяцу лета. Но пока — время дайджеста. Собрали для вас главные новости и инсайты месяца🌞 📌 Panda Lift × StartExam: управленческий резерв без потерь культуры Показываем, как компания Panda Lift вырастила резерв через оценку 360. Вы узнаете, какие метрики использовались и как масштабировать опыт под производство. 📌 Гибридная работа два года спуст…
❤2🔥1
👋Друзья, напоминаем, что мы переехали на новый телеграм-канал и просим подписаться на нас по новому адресу🫶
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @startexam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой формат оценки результативности сотрудников вам кажется самым эффективным?
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что чаще всего мешает проводить Performance review в вашей компании?
The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие цели вы бы хотели решать с помощью Performance review?
The shares total 288%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 28 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“StartExam. Оценка и развитие персонала” (@startexam), 565 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startexam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.