Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Starover

@starover1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

536subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001782011226
TypeChannel
Username@starover1
DescriptionИностранный агент государства Российская Империя, признанного экстремистской тюрьмой народов, не совместимой с государственным строем СССР и РФ
Created7 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/starover1

Growth

5325365346 Aug 2026, 02:53 — 532 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:40 — 536 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:19 — 536 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 02:536 Aug 2026, 18:19
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 531–537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:19536no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:40536+4
6 Aug 2026, 02:53532first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
166.4%
avg views ÷ 536 subscribers
Avg views / post
892
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (29 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total9,809
Reactions total195
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,050
Videos
1,570
Links
3,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 11 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯5930.3%
😁4121.0%
👍199.74%
😡147.18%
🤡126.15%
115.64%
🥴94.62%
🤔73.59%
🤯73.59%
💊52.56%
🔥21.03%
🤝21.03%
🐳10.513%
👎10.513%
😱10.513%
🙈10.513%
🤣10.513%
🤬10.513%
🦄10.513%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC216 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вообще, если гипотетически (ну а вдруг) "Единая Россия" не наберет подавляющего большинства голосов нв предстоящих выборах, то ситуация в стране станет крайне непредсказуемой: охранота сразу почувствует, что запахнет жареным, и все эти искусственные партии могут вдруг впасть в нервозность относительно своего будущего и попытаться испытать счастья в борьбе с "промахнувшимся Акелой". А тут могут наложиться на ситуацию

💯11🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC≈1,950 views73 reactionsread 6 August 2026

То, что Путин подписал указ о праздновании 700-летия Ипатьевского монастыря, это, конечно, хорошо, но настораживает... Ведь не случайно Царя с семьёй убивали в Ипатьевском доме, а администрация президента РФ (как ранее аппарат и центральный комитет КПСС) расположена в Ипатьевском переулке... P.S. То, что в убийстве Царя и размещении главного органа советской власти присутствовал оккультизм, это очевидно. Поэтому не

😁38💯11🥴9🤔5🤡52🤝2🤣1

5 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,770 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Видимо, для поддержки раскручиваемого сверху противостояния между "белыми" и "красными" глава МИД РФ Лавров сообщил, что вместе с губернатором Подмосковья Воробьёвым обсуждает возможность вернуть Ногинску его историческое название - Богородск. Если это не пустая предвыборная болтовня в пользу "ЕР", и действительно будет сделано, то однозначно говорит о том, что соответствующие исследования общественного мнения прове

👍9🤡4🤔2

5 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,510 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Апешечка и "Единая Россия" пытаются добавить очков коммунистам, поскольку их представители открывают памятники красному упырю Джугашвили по уголовной кличке Сталин. Это можно было бы назвать безумной слепотой, но это целенаправленная политика: в ситуации падения рейтинга партии власти не дать народу вернуться на пути своя, а толкать его в сторону восстановления красного проекта...

💯10💊51👎1🙈1

5 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,270 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Цифровой концлагерь в действии👆Эти меры приведут к сокращению домашнего скота и зависимости селян от продуктовых сетей. А значит, они на это и направлены.

💯16😱1

5 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC124 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zakupki_time

С 1 сентября 2026 года владельцы личных подсобных хозяйств обязаны разместить на внешней стене курятника табличку с присвоенным курицам идентификатором в государственной ветеринарной системе, сообщил председатель Комитета Государственной Думы по вопросам собственности, земельным и имущественным отношениям Сергей Гаврилов. Парламентарий подчеркнул, что владелец куриц оплачивает изготовление и установку таблички, а вне

😡14🤡3🐳1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC359 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤬1🤯1🦄1

3 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC≈1,180 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вообще, конечно, неприятно, когда нехорошие люди из калининградского регионального отделения РВИО, которое уже 14 лет "вставляет палки в колеса" фестиваля "Гумбиненский прорыв", запихивают в фото под своим плакатом людей, приехавших на совсем другое мероприятие... Впрочем, чего с них взять... У них, вроде, и деньги бюджетные есть, и поддержка властей всех уровней... Но вот только нет совести - и не хватает людей...

🤯6💯4😁1

3 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC719 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вчера мы провели 15-й военно-исторический фестиваль "Гумбинненский прорыв". Трудно поверить, что позади столько лет работы по популяризации исторических мест сражений Первой мировой войны. Подготовка шла очень тяжело, но всё получилось. Причем не просто получилось, а превзошло ожидания. И людей пришло рекордное количество. И люди получили правильные эмоции. Мы смогли тронуть сердца более 1000 человек. Мы - это военн

7👍4

2 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC297 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как же всё-таки много зависит от таланта фотографа. Умение выбрать позицию, уловить нужный момент, - это искусство. И на фотографии, созданные таким искусством, можно смотреть бесконечно долго.

👍4😁21

29 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTC414 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

О как! 👆Это, получается, была медийная проверка населения на "вшивость"?

💯7👍2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @starover1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 327,572 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Starover” (@starover1), 536 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starover1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.