Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Цитаты Артема Старостина

@starostin_creator

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,429subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001148908182
TypeChannel
Username@starostin_creator
Created30 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/starostin_creator

Growth

2,4292,4342,431.57 August 2026 — 2,434 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,434 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,433 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,431 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,429 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,428–2,435 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:252,429-2
10 Aug 2026, 20:222,431-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:462,433-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:462,434no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:342,434first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 2,429 subscribers
Avg views / post
413
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 May 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,240
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

482 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529904234527722263730062.2%
custom 529897914912842744618237.8%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 482reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @starostin_creator. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC226 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как менеджер ненавижу ЭТО, поэтому сделал ВОТ ЭТО Каким бы креативщиком и предпринимателем я не был, де-факто много работаю менеджером и жестко хейчу: 1. Пинать людей. Напоминать про задачи, просить «статус» и так далее. Просто пиздец. 2. Напоминать про созвоны, чтобы никто не проебался + самому помнить про созвоны, чтобы не проебаться. 3. Искать всякую душную инфу постоянно, типа реквизиты, контакты и тд. Кажет

custom 529904234527722263710custom 52989791491284274464

20 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC518 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самый полезный гайд для продвижения общепита Бесплатно. Никакие курсы и консультации не нужны, если создадите норм продукт, выберите норм локацию и сделаете ЭТО. Я использую ЭТО в шаурме и в ресторане. Выхлоп по охватам — как от 10 сммщиков. Ещё и люди реальные приходят, деньги тратят. Готовы? 1. Пишите один абзац текста, в котором максимально четко отвечаете на вопрос ЗАЧЕМ К ВАМ РЕАЛЬНО ИДТИ рандомным людям. 2

custom 52990423452772226378custom 52989791491284274464

18 Jul 2026, 05:50 UTC496 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лечим синдром самозванца в работе (и жизни) с ИИ В обществе сформировалось два подхода к работе с нейронками. Один прошаренный айтишник на деловой встрече сказал недавно: «Я вообще не верю в промты, в чаты. У меня АРМИЯ ИИ-агентов, просто в телегу войсы пишу, и они там сами решат какой промт для чего лучше, всё сделают и дадут мне выбрать решение. Вот недавно приказал им взять мои видосы из облака, отсмотреть, выб

custom 52989791491284274467custom 52990423452772226375

13 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC850 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💬💬💬 ИВЕНТ: ВАЙБКОДИНГ БЕЗ ИЛЛЮЗИЙ И ВОЗДУХАНСТВА 19 и 26 июля Оффлайн и онлайн Собираемся, вместе с 0 запускаем продукт и прикручиваем оплату. Все показываем, разбираем и объясняем на пальцах. Можно взять ноут и делать вместе с нами, можно просто послушать, позадавать вопросы. Что такое вайбкодинг Верхушка айсберга: мы описываем пожелания, а нейронка создает, дизайнит и деплоит ИТ-продукт. Звучит просто, на практ

custom 52989791491284274469custom 52990423452772226378

11 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC565 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот такую визитку раздавал на бизнес-ивенте. Думал, будет прикольно, но 9 из 10 людей вопросительно пялились и не понимали зачем рандомный чел сует им свои права. Некоторые отказывались, думали скам какой-то🙂 Тут промокод на бесплатный пробный тариф есть, но кто его вообще заметил? Судя по активациям — никто Кажется, переборщил с креативом, надо было делать что-то проще и понятней, эх

custom 529897914912842744634custom 529904234527722263712

8 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC601 views39 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

От универского стартапа до ВкусВилла Весной меня позвали ментором в Центральный университет (это чето в ЦЕНТРЕ мск), помогать студентам запускать стартапы. Я сразу же выбрал заряженную первокурсницу с идеей о радикально здоровом фастфуде. Она выбрала меня. Но я не хотел терять время на универскую возню по регламентам, поэтому мы договорились, что будем делать все по-взрослому (наскок это реально в 18-19 лет). Пару

custom 529904234527722263727custom 529897914912842744612

3 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈5,310 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ищу человека на развитие б2б в Сабке Огромный растущий рынок, максимум свободы/самореализации и неограниченное количество денег. Задача Любым законным способом находить команды от 10 чел и подключать им корпоративные аккаунты. Емейл-рассылки, соцсети, личка, статьи. Что угодно. Оплата Небольшой фикс + постоянный % от оплат твоих клиентов. Важно Иметь амбиции, не проебываться. Базовые маркетинговые скиллы + пони

custom 52990423452772226377custom 52989791491284274465

29 Jun 2026, 15:10 UTC706 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Занимательная статистика успехов и проебов из Сабки Мы накопили дофигища статистики + 11к анкет от пользователей с марта по июнь + потратили под 700к на рекламу. Лендос-убийца 61% людей платят ДО первого сообщения. То есть принимают решение о покупке сразу на сайте. Это и круто, но и супер неожиданно и контринтуитивно. По идее, у нас и продукт такой, где логично сначала попробовать, и бесплатный тариф есть. Но нет

custom 529904234527722263730custom 529897914912842744612

26 Jun 2026, 10:07 UTC661 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Как вайбкодить без иллюзий и воздуханства? 19-23 июля мы с @hoodyakoff_vibes хотим научить вас делать ЭТО. Почему именно мы? Вот пруфы: мои проекты описал тут, в основном это рабочие процессы, аналитика, контент. Стас же с нуля навайбкодил свой продукт «Сопровод» и хорошо зарабатывает на нём. Будем оффлайн в Новосибе + онлайн в интернете Но мы пока не знаем, надо ли вам оно? И если надо, то что именно? Я за эту н

custom 529904234527722263711custom 52989791491284274465

23 Jun 2026, 17:23 UTC662 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Апдейт, седне посчитали, что примерно 500 тыщ за месяц инста принесла в шавуху сверх обычной выручки 😈 Кстати, рилсы шавухи репостил Бульвар Депо, комментили Авиасейлс и xcho, ещё в каком-то большом канале про маркетинг выкладывали

custom 529904234527722263727custom 529897914912842744613

17 Jun 2026, 11:20 UTC761 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Разница между ИТ и оффлайн-бизнесом Эти полгода я занимаюсь ларьком шаурмы (несколько часов в неделю) и Сабкой (24/7). 1. МАРКЕТИНГ Продвигать шавуху оказалось ОЧЕНЬ… легко. Без напрягов, без контент-планов, без сммщиков. Чето снял, спел, на отзыв ответил, чуть смелости и самоиронии — готово. Только в ЭТОМ месяце у нас 2,5 млн просмотров и 1000 подписчиков на обычном аккаунте с подписью «мясо, шашлык». Еще и рекор

custom 529904234527722263721custom 52989791491284274469

16 Jun 2026, 05:48 UTC738 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как же вы заебали с нейрослопом Я не могу смотреть Ютуб. Минаевых и Файбов давно дропнул, но сейчас включил нишевого чела, который спокойно без монтажа 20 минут поясняет прикольные штуки за маркетинг… НО И ОН ТОЖЕ ТЕПЕРЬ ЧИТАЕТ ЕБУЧИЙ НЕЙРОСЛОП. Как же надо не уважать себя? Ладно зрители, фиг с ними. Но себя-то? Как можно в каждом втором (!!!) предложении использовать базовую ИИ-конструкцию «этот бренд стал не прос

custom 529897914912842744614custom 529904234527722263714

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @starostin_creator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 233,957 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Цитаты Артема Старостина” (@starostin_creator), 2,429 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starostin_creator.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.