4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 416–423 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 05:55
422
+4
15 Aug 2026, 16:04
418
+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:33
417
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:07
417
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 422 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.0
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
27.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
15 (26 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
408
Reactions total
111
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
329 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
103
31.3%
custom 5260221411493957777
81
24.6%
🔥
42
12.8%
custom 5395391492657272948
41
12.5%
👍
38
11.6%
👏
16
4.86%
custom 5402292057697965654
4
1.22%
💋
3
0.912%
💯
1
0.304%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @starlight_alchemy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ДВА ПЕРЕХОДА ЗА ТРИ ДНЯ
КАК НЕ СЛОМАТЬСЯ НА РАЗГОНЕ
9 августа Меркурий врывается во Льва. 11 августа Марс заходит в Рака. А потом еще и затмение 12 августа. Это не просто смена планет — это смена режима. И если не понять, что происходит, можно успеть наломать дров за выходные.
ЧТО ПРОИСХОДИТ
9 августа планета мышления и общения и переходит во Льва. Разговоры становятся громче, мнения — категоричнее. Меркурий во Ль…
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
ваше скрытое бессознательное
(знаю, многие ждали именно эту колоду!)
Друзья, предлагаю провести экспресс-интерактив, который покажет ваши скрытые мотивы и бессознательные установки! Это интересный срез вашего мироощущения.
Для этого нам потребуется восхитительная колода мак Sigurd Fables.
От вас - цифра от1️⃣до5️⃣6️⃣в комментариях.
От меня - мешаю колоду и выдаю вам ту самую.
🔠🔠🔠🔠
🗺️ @alexandra_kopylo
🔖ОБРАТНЫЙ ОТСЧЁТ САТУРНА✡️
С 26 июля Сатурн — планета ответственности, границ и правил — на 138 дней нажимает на тормоз.
Сатурн в Овне — это про инициативу, лидерство, действие. А ретроградный Сатурн в Овне — про пересмотр этой самой инициативы. Всё, что вы запустили наспех, на энтузиазме и без плана Б, начнёт давать сбои. То, что строилось на прочной основе, напротив, обретёт завершённую форму.
❗️❗️‼️
Это не про …
МЕРКУРИЙ СНОВА ПОШЁЛ ВПЕРЁД
24 июля Меркурий✡️ наконец развернулся в директное движение.
Планета коммуникации и мышления сменила направление. Что это значит на практике?
1️⃣воздух становится чище. Мысли перестают путаться. То, что казалось сложным и запутанным, начинает обретать ясные очертания.
2️⃣появляется зелёный свет для действий. Период ретроМеркурия не подходит для начинания новых проектов. Теперь это огра…
🔖ЛЬВИНЫЙ ЭНТУЗИАЗМ МОЖЕТ БОЛЬНО УКУСИТЬ
Да, я знаю, вы уже налили бокалы за Львов ♌️, готовитесь дарить подарки и раздавать комплименты. Солнце на днях соединяется с Юпитером во Льве, и всех нас распирает от желания блистать, сорить деньгами и спасать мир. Юпитер раздувает амбиции до небес, щедрость зашкаливает, кажется, что мы можем всё.
А теперь включите голову.
Прямо напротив этой огненной феерии стоит Плутон в…
🔖ВРЕМЯ ВКЛЮЧИТЬ ПРОЖЕКТОР
22 июля в 22:13 по мск Солнце войдет в знак Льва. Нет напряжения, нет необходимости приспосабливаться. Есть только чистая, ничем не ограниченная энергия жизни.
Последние недели, пока Солнце было в Раке, многие уходили в себя. Больше времени проводили дома, разбирались с эмоциями, искали опору в семье и прошлом. Лев разворачивает этот вектор на 180 градусов.
Что меняется? 🪄
⏺️Появляется же…
🔔 НОВОЛУНИЕ 14 ИЮЛЯ
в 12:43 по мск наступает новолуние в знаке Рак ♋️
Рак — самый домашний и чувствительный знак зодиака. Поэтому темы, которые выходят на первый план: дом, семья, эмоции, безопасность, корни.
Новолуние в Раке — это не про громкие старты и внешние достижения. Оно про то, чтобы ненадолго заглянуть в прошлое — не для того, чтобы бесконечно рефлексировать, а чтобы получить ответы на давние вопросы.
Но…
❗️❗️‼️
Спустя почти полгода ➡️ воскрешение чата Алхимиков 🤪 как раз на РетроМерке
Каюсь, неприлично долго, да. Стыдно... немного ☺️
Но, если вам актуальны наши темы - welcome.
Пишем мне в л/с для вступления
Ваша ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
❤🔥5👏5🔥5👍1custom 53953914926572729481
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @starlight_alchemy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 898,526 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Starlight Alchemy | Астрология” (@starlight_alchemy), 422 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starlight_alchemy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
