Channel
@starcher
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
610subscribers
-82 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001168925059 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @starcher |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/starcher |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 610 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:49 | 616 | -18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 634 | -16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 650 | -40 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 690 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 692 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 692 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
350 reactions across 7 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5445208487611096817 | 107 | 30.6% | |
| 🤩 | 62 | 17.7% | |
| custom 5244874698776390637 | 61 | 17.4% | |
| 🎉 | 34 | 9.71% | |
| 💘 | 20 | 5.71% | |
| 💅 | 17 | 4.86% | |
| 🦄 | 13 | 3.71% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 3.43% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 2.29% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 2.29% | |
| custom 5449822021221367358 | 5 | 1.43% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.286% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.286% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.286% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 350 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @starcher. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🪧🪧🪧 🪧🪧🪧🪧 🪧 🪧🪧 🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧🪧 Журналистка из МГИМО и певица обсудили меня в новом интервью, скорее переходите по ссылке и читайте 📰
custom 544520848761109681719🤩15💘11custom 52448746987763906371
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 #топподкаст 🕔Тайминг: 0:00 - 0:44 - вступление ⭐️ 0:45 - 02:35 - как эпизод из 4 сезона мультсериала Винкс надел на меня розовые очки 😏 02:36 - 04:17 - инсайт на воркшопе, примеры с Натальей Водяновой и Мэрилин Монро 👸 04:18 - 05:12 - про разочарования: распад дома блогеров и неудачные коллаборации😔 05:13 - 06:40 - рождение названия и концепция "САМА СЕБЕ ..." 🫦 06:41 - 11:07 - как мне пред…
🦄13custom 544520848761109681713custom 52448746987763906379💘1💯1🤩1
Video message, posted without a caption
🏆8custom 54452084876110968176🔥5custom 52448746987763906372💘1
🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Где можно увидеть разнообразие порхающих бабочек и ярких попугаев❓ 🦋🦜 Конечно же, в новом парке тропических бабочек 🦋 С ними классно дружить и делать незабываемые фотки, ведь они - гости из разных уголков планеты 🌎 🔴 А вы знали, что факт о том, что эти прекрасные насекомые живут всего лишь один день, вовсе не подтверждённый факт, а миф? 🤯🤯 МЫ ВСЮ ЖИЗНЬ ЖИЛИ ВО ЛЖИ 🙈 Этот миф появился из-за того, чт…
😍11custom 54452084876110968176custom 54498220212213673585💘4
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🏆 Помните, как в школе на уроках истории и географии нам давали задание перечислить города "Золотого кольца России"🤩🇷🇺 Погуляла по одному из них. Раньше видела только картинки на страницах учебников 😻 Узнаёте❓
🤩41custom 544520848761109681729custom 524487469877639063723💅3😍1
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Сегодня, 30 июня, состоялось торжественное вручение дипломов выпускникам Московского государственного университета имени М. В. Ломоносова 🎓 Это любовь с первого взгляда и навсегда, больше нечего добавить ❤️ #филфакforever #MSUfinished #ВЫПУСК2026
custom 544520848761109681727🎉22💅13💘3🤩2👍1👏1
🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Празднование в честь окончания МГУ ощущается как второй день рождения 🎂 Обсудили всех преподавателей, подвели итоги пятилетнего обучения, спели караоке🎤 Готовы вступать во взрослую жизнь 😎 Всех однокурсниц отметила в 🖥 Отдельная благодарность Маше за фотосъёмку 📷 кадры огненные 📛
custom 524487469877639063726🎉12custom 54452084876110968177🔥3🤩3💅1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @starcher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Топчик от Черкасовой 📲 Тг-журнал Альбины” (@starcher), 610 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/starcher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.