Channel
@standwithHK47
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
537subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001855284478 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @standwithHK47 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/standwithHK47 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 537 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 537 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 28 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
52 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 38.5% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 19.2% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 17.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 9.62% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2024 to 26 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://thewitnesshk.com/47%e4%ba%ba%e6%a1%88-%e7%bd%aa%e6%88%90%e8%a2%ab%e5%91%8a%e5%88%866%e6%89%b9%e6%b1%82%e6%83%85-%e9%a0%90%e5%ae%9a8%e6%9c%88%e4%b8%ad%e5%89%8d%e5%ae%8c%e6%88%90-%e6%93%9a%e6%82%89%e9%9c%80%e5%b0%b1/
Photo, posted without a caption
【收到匿名投稿：六月風霜凜冽，港人仍在堅持。】 臨近官方不能說的敏感日子，一眾香港人在迷霧裏登山，榮光照亮獅子山頂。 登山者「梁先生」說：「香港數字，記錄歷史。 數字從來紀錄重大歷史事件，讓人們容易回憶起當時發生事情。近年最令全世界印象深刻，應該是911事件。 對於香港人，我們永遠不會忘記8964 。悼念六四事件，成為香港人的回憶及傳承，這些活動不僅是對歷史的回顧，也是對自由和民主價值的堅持。它們提醒我們，對過去的記憶和對未來的希望都是社會進步的重要動力。 自2019年起，數字更成為重要時間點及回憶，有人可能因恐懼避而不談，有人仍然默默藏於心裡… 那些日子心中印記及香港血淋淋歷史，成王敗寇… 縱使歷史如何被竄改，我們這一代，不論是流亡海外或留下來的，都要保存真相。真如我們當初保留六四真相一樣。有幾多日子你還記得？ 6月9日、6月12日、6月16日、7月1日、7月21日、8月31日、10月1日… 今時今日的香港，再沒…
👏9🙏2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5🙏1
http://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-statement-on-the-guilty-verdict-of-the-nsl-47-in-hong-kong UK statement on the guilty verdict of the ‘NSL 47’ in Hong Kong https://x.com/ukinhongkong/status/1796190040185315377?s=52&t=luMqmi816PvpG8M8ibDsLw
https://hongkongfp.com/2024/05/30/breaking-14-hong-kong-democrats-convicted-2-cleared-of-conspiring-to-commit-subversion-in-landmark-national-security-trial/
🤬4
14罪成被告6人勝初選 兩無罪者均落敗 李予信被指為Plan B續參選立會 民主派初選 47 人案，16 名不認罪被告於周四（30 日）裁決，當中 14 人罪成，劉偉聰及李予信則獲判無罪。14 名罪成被告中，除吳政亨被指為初選組織者，其他 13 人均有參加初選，當中 6 人勝出，其餘 7 人落敗。 其中，何桂藍在新東初選中獲得 26,802 票，成為新東票后，並正式報名參與立法會選舉，但遭 DQ；參選港島區的鄭達鴻亦獲 11,090 票當選，同樣在報名立會選舉後被 DQ。 其餘於初選勝出，並有報名參選立會的被告，包括鄒家成、陳志全、林卓廷、何啟明及衞服界的余慧明。楊雪盈則於初選落敗，但被指為 Plan B 續報名參選立會。罪成的被告中，亦有部分人是於初選落敗、沒報名參選立會，包括彭卓棋、黃碧雲、施德來、梁國雄和柯耀林。 至於兩名無罪被告，劉偉聰初選落敗後沒再參選，李予信則在超區初選落敗後，由公民黨安排參選港島直選。
🤬6👍1🥴1
https://thewitnesshk.com/47人案-周四裁決三焦點罪成與否案中角色律政司會
【47人案整合6】妥協或抗爭——2019年運動和初選，庭上被如何論述？ https://www.inmediahk.net/node/%E7%A4%BE%E9%81%8B/%E3%80%9047%E4%BA%BA%E6%A1%88%E6%95%B4%E5%90%886%E3%80%91%E5%A6%A5%E5%8D%94%E6%88%96%E6%8A%97%E7%88%AD%E2%80%94%E2%80%942019%E5%B9%B4%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E5%92%8C%E5%88%9D%E9%81%B8%EF%BC%8C%E5%BA%AD%E4%B8%8A%E8%A2%AB%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E8%AB%96%E8%BF%B0%EF%BC%9F
【47人案整合5】騎劫、不民主、太瘋狂——戴耀廷和「攬炒」，庭上被如何論述？ https://www.inmediahk.net/node/%E7%A4%BE%E9%81%8B/%E3%80%9047%E4%BA%BA%E6%A1%88%E6%95%B4%E5%90%885%E3%80%91%E9%A8%8E%E5%8A%AB%E3%80%81%E4%B8%8D%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%BB%E3%80%81%E5%A4%AA%E7%98%8B%E7%8B%82%E2%80%94%E2%80%94%E6%88%B4%E8%80%80%E5%BB%B7%E5%92%8C%E3%80%8C%E6%94%AC%E7%82%92%E3%80%8D%EF%BC%8C%E5%BA%AD%E4%B8%8A%E8%A2%AB%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E8%AB%96%E8%BF%B0%EF%BC%9F
【47人案整合4】質疑欺騙選民、禁止發表政見——整理三位法官的審訊介入 https://www.inmediahk.net/node/%E3%80%9047%E4%BA%BA%E6%A1%88%E6%95%B4%E5%90%884%E3%80%91%E8%B3%AA%E7%96%91%E6%AC%BA%E9%A8%99%E9%81%B8%E6%B0%91%E3%80%81%E7%A6%81%E6%AD%A2%E7%99%BC%E8%A1%A8%E6%94%BF%E8%A6%8B%E2%80%94%E2%80%94%E6%95%B4%E7%90%86%E4%B8%89%E4%BD%8D%E6%B3%95%E5%AE%98%E7%9A%84%E5%AF%A9%E8%A8%8A%E4%BB%8B%E5%85%A5
【47人案整合3】當否決程序寫在《基本法》、「奪權」不可能，無差別否決預算案是顛覆嗎？ https://www.inmediahk.net/node/%E7%A4%BE%E9%81%8B/%E3%80%9047%E4%BA%BA%E6%A1%88%E6%95%B4%E5%90%883%E3%80%91%E7%95%B6%E5%90%A6%E6%B1%BA%E7%A8%8B%E5%BA%8F%E5%AF%AB%E5%9C%A8%E3%80%8A%E5%9F%BA%E6%9C%AC%E6%B3%95%E3%80%8B%E3%80%81%E3%80%8C%E5%A5%AA%E6%AC%8A%E3%80%8D%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AF%E8%83%BD%EF%BC%8C%E7%84%A1%E5%B7%AE%E5%88%A5%E5%90%A6%E6%B1%BA%E9%A0%90%E7%AE%97%E6%A1%88%E6%98%…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @standwithHK47. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 636,835 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“初選無罪 Stand with Hong Kong 47” (@standwithHK47), 537 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/standwithHK47.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.