Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Stand in the Gap

@standinthegap

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

49subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001953905011
TypeChannel
Username@standinthegap
DescriptionRe-Entry | Family Services | Justice Reform Together, we can make a difference 🛡️ https://www.standinthegap.foundation/
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/standinthegap

Growth

497 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 12:3049no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:3949first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
81
Videos
15
Links
52

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 17s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2054.1%
🙏821.6%
🔥410.8%
👏38.11%
❤‍🔥12.70%
🫡12.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2025 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 17:36 UTC18 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/standinthegapfoundation/p/they-stole-the-election-once-the?r=8jzsdr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

25 Jun 2026, 17:25 UTC32 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/standinthegapfoundation/p/the-courts-are-still-blocking-justice?r=8jzsdr&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=title

25 Jun 2026, 15:06 UTC26 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/standinthegapfoundation/p/they-called-him-a-terrorist-before?r=8jzsdr&utm_medium=ios

24 Jun 2026, 20:35 UTC22 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/standinthegapfoundation/p/finally-accountability-cuts-both?r=8jzsdr&utm_medium=ios

24 Jun 2026, 20:34 UTCviews —

Stand in the Gap pinned «We are back up and running. https://substack.com/@standinthegapfoundation/note/p-201180547?r=8jzsdr&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action»

24 Jun 2026, 20:34 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026

We are back up and running. https://substack.com/@standinthegapfoundation/note/p-201180547?r=8jzsdr&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

5 Jul 2025, 04:00 UTC91 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

As the fireworks light up the skies this July 4, 2025, our hearts at Stand in the Gap are heavy with the memory of those we lost in the wake and aftermath of January 6, 2021. This first Fourth of July since so many were pardoned is a moment to pause, to reflect, and to honor the precious lives that are no longer with us. Their absence casts a shadow on our celebrations, a reminder of the deep cost of freedom. These

3👏3🫡1

2 Jul 2025, 21:03 UTC65 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Today, we gathered to honor and celebrate the beautiful life of our brother We came together in love and unity to say our final goodbyes. The service was profoundly moving, a tapestry of memories and stories that reminded us of the incredible legacy Bart leaves behind. At the graveside, emotions poured freely—grief, yes, but also gratitude for the gift of having known such a remarkable man. The burial site was brea

22 Jun 2025, 10:42 UTC699 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

With heavy hearts, we mourn Bart Shively, a Marine veteran and January 6th defendant, now resting in the arms of our Savior. Bart’s love America shone through every sacrifice—serving our nation, standing for truth, and facing cancer with unyielding faith. His legacy calls us to honor his fight for liberty. Rest in peace, hero.

🙏72

15 Jun 2025, 13:15 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

It is with immense honor that we share Bart Shively’s Marine Corps portrait. Bart isn’t just a Marine veteran or a January 6th patriot—he’s a man who’s lived his life with unshakable courage and a heart full of love for this country. To know Bart is to know a true hero, someone who’s always stood tall for what he believes in. Right now, Bart’s fighting his toughest battle yet against non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Even in

🙏1

11 Jun 2025, 23:54 UTC415 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Marine. Patriot. Fighter. January 6th Defendant. Bart Shively is nearing the end of his courageous battle with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. A proud U.S. Marine Corps veteran and January 6th defendant, Bart has faced every trial with honor and resilience. Now, we’re rallying to honor his life and legacy. Every dollar raised will go directly to covering his funeral and afterlife expenses. Help us send this brave vetera

26 May 2025, 22:55 UTC46 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

This Memorial Day, we pause to remember the heroes who gave their lives in service to our country. 🇺🇸 Their courage, sacrifice, and unwavering love for America will never be forgotten. At Stand in the Gap, we remain committed to supporting those who continue to carry the weight of that sacrifice—veterans, families, and patriots alike. ❤️

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @standinthegap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 953,692 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stand in the Gap” (@standinthegap), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/standinthegap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.