Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stalker Labs

Channel

Stalker Labs

@stalkerlabz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

190subscribers

+182 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003977326747
TypeChannel
Username@stalkerlabz
Created30 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/stalkerlabz

Growth

821411119 August 2026 — 8 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8 subscribers2 September 2026 — 214 subscribers12 September 2026 — 190 subscribers19019 August 202612 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 24 days, net +182. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 03:41190-24
2 Sept 2026, 19:52214+206
19 Aug 2026, 17:578no change
19 Aug 2026, 15:158first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

25 Jun 2026, 01:55 UTC32 viewsread 19 August 2026
Photo

⚙️ اتوماسیون را از پایلوت بیرون بکش اتوماسیون AI دیگر یعنی یک چت‌بات کنار دست تیم نیست. گوگل‌کلاد می‌گوید شرکت‌ها دارند به سمت agentic enterprise می‌روند؛ عامل‌هایی که در عملیات واقعی کار انجام می‌دهند، نه فقط متن تولید می‌کنند. من برای شروع این مسیر، از یک فرایند کوچک ولی پرتکرار شروع می‌کنم: گزارش فروش، پاسخ‌گویی پشتیبانی، دسته‌بندی درخواست‌ها، یا خلاصه‌سازی اسناد داخلی. خروجی دقیق را بنویس: چه چیزی باید تحویل شو

25 Jun 2026, 01:43 UTC32 viewsread 19 August 2026
Photo

📊 داشبوردها دارند کم‌کم پیر می‌شوند چیزی که آرام دارد اتفاق می‌افتد این است: تحلیل داده از یک کار فنی داخل IT، دارد تبدیل می‌شود به اهرم رشد. بازارش از $82.23B در 2025 به $104.39B در 2026 می‌رسد؛ پیش‌بینی 2034 هم $495.87B است. این عددها بوی بودجه می‌دهند، نه فقط گزارش. فرق اصلی هم دیگر در داشتن دیتا نیست. در استفاده از هوش مصنوعی مولد برای جواب گرفتن سریع‌تر است. در یک نظرسنجی از 1,000 رهبر داده و کسب‌وکار، 56% شرک

24 Jun 2026, 22:41 UTC22 viewsread 19 August 2026
Photo

فاصله‌ی شرکت‌های AI-محور با بقیه، از «ابزار بیشتر» نمی‌آید؛ از تمرکز روی یک نقطه‌ی پول‌ساز می‌آید. طبق PwC، فقط چند شرکت از AI به رشد درآمد و حتی پریمیوم ارزش‌گذاری رسیده‌اند؛ بقیه معمولاً فقط کمی بهره‌وری می‌گیرند. مسئله واقعی این است: AI را پخش می‌کنند، نه متمرکز. 🎯 کاری که از امروز می‌شود کرد: یک «فرآیند پرتکرار و قابل‌اندازه‌گیری» را انتخاب کن، نه کل شرکت را. مثلاً در مارکتینگ، پشتیبانی یا توسعه نرم‌افزار؛ همان

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @stalkerlabz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stalker Labs” (@stalkerlabz), 190 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stalkerlabz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.