Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 30 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91–92 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 06:55
91
-1
12 Aug 2026, 18:07
92
no change
12 Aug 2026, 00:31
92
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 14 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
19
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2021 to 20 February 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Приветствуем вас на нашем официальном канале.
🚀🚀🚀
Кто еще не знает, каждый четверг в 19:00 по Киеву мы проводим онлайн вебинары для новичков и для тех, кто хочет разобраться, что такое крипта и как начать зарабатывать на ней.
📊📈📉
Знакомим с нашей монетой 💰LANDC и с рекламным💣 брокером Cotras.
Кто не успел посетить вебинар прошлой недели, мы записали видео и опубликовали на нашей официальной странице в YouTube.
Перех…
Приветствуем всех новых подписчиков в официальной группе компании COTRAS!
Рады сообщить вам порцию приятных новостей.
Для всех новичков нашей компании работает специальная акция!
COTRAS дарит монеты LANDC
🪙🎁🪙🎁🪙🎁🪙🎁
✔️Pегистрация на сайт 5 LANDC
✔️Подписка на Telegram 5 LANDC
✔️Подписка на Instagram 5 LANDC
✔️Регистрация Metamask 1 LANDC
Заявку на получение монет оставляйте на сайте в разделе Landcoin ➡️ Подарок.
…
Уважаемые партнёры!
У нас для вас новость, которую мы все вместе очень ждали!
Сегодня ночью запустили и протестировали вывод тела монет со стейкинг-пула на прямые кошельки в сети Binance Smart Chain (BEP20).
При выводе всего объема монет со стейкинг пула в период после 6 месяцев (со дня последней отправки монет в стейкинг) - комиссию за транзакцию компания COTRAS берет на себя.
Рекомендуем использовать для данно…
Landcoin news 🌐
Рады сообщить всем приятную новость!
💠По заказу международного рекламного брокера Cotras Ltd. был проведён независимый аудит блокчейна монеты Landcoin.
С результатами аудита в скором времени можно будет ознакомиться на сайте
https://cotras.global/
💠 Сегодня, 14.08.2021 состоялся официальный запуск 🚀 стейкинга монеты.
Первые держатели уже разморозили свои монеты и начали эмиссию. Все это в два клика…
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @staking_cotras. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@staking_cotras named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@cotras_officially named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COTRAS_official” (@staking_cotras), 91 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/staking_cotras.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.