Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 28 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 18:17
32
-1
21 Aug 2026, 12:55
33
-1
11 Aug 2026, 00:02
34
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:01
34
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 4 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
450 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
149
33.1%
👍
110
24.4%
🔥
101
22.4%
🎉
86
19.1%
👏
2
0.444%
🍾
1
0.222%
😍
1
0.222%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 450 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2025 to 17 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Stakez.io – Unlock Maximum Yield with MEV Intelligence 💰
Tired of average returns? At Stakez.io, we don’t just stake —
we extract the hidden alpha using MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) strategies. 💡
🔹 MEV-Powered Yield Optimization
🔹 Real-time strategy deployment
🔹 Superior returns vs traditional staking
🔹 Fully automated, non-custodial & secure
Stake smarter. Earn bigger.
Join the future of staking now at 👉 Sta
🌐 The Future of Staking is Here – Stakez.io
As blockchain evolves, so does the way we earn. Stakez.io is leading the next wave with MEV-powered staking, combining cutting-edge algorithms and AI to unlock maximum yield potential.
🚀 Why Stakez.io is the future:
🔹 Daily compounding rewards
🔹 No lock-in period – full flexibility
🔹 MEV strategies previously used only by pros
🔹 Built for long-term sustainable growth
Thousa…
MEV Strategy: The Future of Crypto Rewards
As the crypto space evolves, traditional staking models are being outpaced by smarter, more efficient systems. MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) strategies are leading this shift by unlocking hidden profit opportunities directly from blockchain activity.
Unlike fixed returns, MEV-based staking adapts to market dynamics in real time, optimizing every block for maximum yield. Th…
💸 Build a Powerful Portfolio with Daily ROI – Only on Stakez.io!
Why let your crypto sit idle?
With Stakez.io, you earn daily passive rewards through MEV-powered staking — boosting your portfolio without lifting a finger.
✅ Daily ROI
✅ Real-time compounding
✅ No lock-ins
✅ AI-driven strategy
💼 Whether you're a beginner or pro, Stakez helps you grow smarter, faster, and stronger.
🚀 Start staking now at Stakez.io and t…
🚀 MEV Staking vs. Normal Staking 🔍
Still using traditional staking for low returns? 🤔
Let’s compare:
💠 Normal Staking
✔️ Fixed APY (5–12%)
❌ Lock-in periods
❌ Limited strategies
❌ Low flexibility
⚡️ MEV-Powered Staking on Stakez.io
🔥 Dynamic yields up to 30%+
💸 Rewards every minute
🔓 No lock-ins
📈 Powered by AI-driven arbitrage & Mev Strategies
🚀 Getting Started with Stakez.io is Easy!
1️⃣ Visit 👉 Stakez.io
2️⃣ Click “Get Started”
3️⃣ Connect your Wallet
4️⃣ Stake your crypto & let MEV strategies do the work
5️⃣ Sit back & Watch Rewards Roll In Daily 🤑
🔒 No lock-ins. 100% MEV-powered profits.
Start earning today with Stakez.io
💹 MEV Strategies = Daily Gains 🚀
Maximize your crypto potential with MEV-powered staking!
📈 Earn consistent daily returns
🤖 Backed by smart AI algorithms
🔁 No lock-ins. Just real-time profits.
Start growing your investment today at 👉 Stakez.io
Stakez.io pinned «🚀 Earn Fixed Passive Returns with MEV at Stakez.io! 💰 Let your USDT work for you with Stakez.io — where smart MEV strategies generate real-time profits from blockchain activity! No trading, no stress, just stable daily returns powered by Maximal Extractable…»
⚡️ Stakez | Where MEV Becomes Money
Hidden alpha. Zero fluff.
Our AI-honed MEV strategies scan block by block to extract value others miss — delivering minute-by-minute rewards to you.
🧠 Run by a battle-tested team of DeFi tacticians
💰 $2M+ staked by smart money
🛑 No lockups. Just liquid gains.
Ready to earn like the insiders?
🌐 stakez.io
🚀 Earn Fixed Passive Returns with MEV at Stakez.io! 💰
Let your USDT work for you with Stakez.io — where smart MEV strategies generate real-time profits from blockchain activity!
No trading, no stress, just stable daily returns powered by Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). ⚙️📊
✅ Passive income every minute
✅ Fixed ROI with no lock-in
✅ Transparent, secure, automated
Join 2M+ in staking the smarter way.
🔗 Visit Stakez.io…
🚨 This is How MEV Creates Huge Profits in Seconds! 🚨
🎥 Watch now: https://youtube.com/shorts/BYhGFjCjn6Q
💡 MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) is the secret weapon used by top crypto whales to earn from every transaction on the blockchain.
📊 With MEV strategies:
✅ Profits are generated automatically
✅ Opportunities are scanned in real-time
✅ You earn even during market volatility
💼 Platforms like Stakez.io leverage MEV t…
❤64👍12🔥11🎉8
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @stakezio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How many of you are making $100+ per day from staking with MEV strategies? 🚀
Yes79%
No21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2025 to 17 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stakez.io” (@stakezio), 32 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stakezio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.