Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дневничок писателя🪶

@stacywriter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

471subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001675969087
TypeChannel
Username@stacywriter
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stacywriter

Growth

4719 Aug 2026, 00:30 — 471 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 08:31 — 471 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:309 Aug 2026, 08:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 470–472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 08:31471no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:30471first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 11 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

279 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9935.5%
custom 52738931428006383588229.4%
🔥4817.2%
😁3713.3%
custom 522914506395459885262.15%
🌚41.43%
😱31.08%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2026, 08:52 UTC230 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Перечитала два своих старых рассказа и что-то залипла. Они крутые! Это я вообще писала? "Химеру" я бы почесала еще стилистически, а "Грифа" можно чуть разгрузить в плане матчасти, но если об этом не думать, то... Неужели идеи у меня раньше были куда круче? Как будто сейчас я из всех своих страхов написать плохо и не подойти под интересы редакций, издательств и читателей стала писать что-то совсем не из того, что я

7🔥4custom 52738931428006383581

16 May 2026, 19:14 UTC330 views39 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Наконец решилась и закрыла давнишний гештальт — покрасилась в рыжий. Целиком, сама, с далеко идущими планами 🙂 Ну как далеко: я давно считаю, что обязана быть рыжей, и природа так и задумывала с моей бледной кожей, веснушками и зелеными глазами, но вот с волосами вышла осечка, но почему бы не попробовать это исправить? Короче, я впервые красилась, и это был во многих смыслах шок) Во-первых, это не так сложно, а в

26🔥13

6 May 2026, 13:09 UTC393 views49 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Порвался пакет с персиками, три нашли, ищем последний, нигде нет, под всеми шкафами посмотрели, мистика 😱😵‍💫🤌🏻 Тем временем в углу:

😁3712

6 May 2026, 08:11 UTC355 views36 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кладет морду, влажно и горячо дышит в ногу и (совсем ненавязчиво) выпрашивает еду 🥹

custom 5273893142800638358315

4 May 2026, 08:32 UTC359 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В очередной раз удалила Нельзяграм, потому что эфир замусорился до невозможности. 😠 Но на этот раз я подумала уже без ужаса о том, что хорошо бы потихоньку вычеркивать из своей жизни концепцию блогерства. Это всегда было и в радость, и в тягость, но в последнее время я все больше думала о том, что жизнь как в аквариуме (даже если делишься только отдельными аспектами) - это ну такое. И больше всего в этом меня стал р

custom 52738931428006383582211

28 Apr 2026, 08:43 UTC335 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

Детальки!

custom 527389314280063835843

28 Apr 2026, 08:42 UTC316 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Докрутила-дофотошопила ционовую обложку, и мне эта драма больше нравится. Тут ещё такой замысел: у героини все разваливается - поэтому трещина; слева золотой процветающий Цион, а справа - Цион за стеной; ещё на циферблате у героини 9999 баллов, и это как будто максимум, больше не влезет (так и выйдет). Темновата она, конечно, но я потом ещё докручу. Тем более, что Автор Тудей ругается, что я слишком часто меняю обл

8custom 52291450639545988526🔥4

24 Apr 2026, 10:50 UTC395 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мне вернулись права на «Цион» Буду выкладывать его на АТ вот здесь в свободном плавании ✨ Может, конец чуть докручу (или нет, если сил не будет)) В общем, можно читать!

🔥21custom 527389314280063835811

23 Apr 2026, 09:21 UTC396 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

Древо Таргариенов вот (тут качество ещё лучше) 🤸‍♀️☕️

23 Apr 2026, 09:19 UTC393 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Досмотрела 2 сезона «Дома дракона» и порадовалась, что третий выходит в июне. Читала много противоречивого про него, и это не «Игра престолов» (плюс я до сих пор не понимаю, почему Рейниру нужно было играть двум ну абсолютно непохожим актрисам), но мне понравилось, я как-то прочно влипла в мир. Во 2 сезоне было столько драконов, и настроение другое, очень разные сезоны. По-прежнему не могу смотреть моменты открыто

🔥6custom 52738931428006383583

11 Apr 2026, 08:28 UTC389 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Не могу перестать внутреннее орать. Смотрю «дом дракона», 1 сезон (да, я смотрю новинки вовремя), и это что такое, я вас спрашиваю? Почему весь каст резко меняется посередине сезона? Да-да, я уже погуглила, что они сочли, что одна и та же актриса не может играть 19-летнюю и 29-летнюю, и, мол, десять лет разницы — это слишком. Но почему тогда короля просто состарили, а Рейниру играет другая актриса, причем ну абсол

13🌚4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @stacywriter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,123,798 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дневничок писателя🪶” (@stacywriter), 471 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stacywriter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.