Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

sw sticks.

@sswsticks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002768503653
TypeChannel
Username@sswsticks
Descriptionowner — @soofiwe оп — 5 ‐ 30 🎯 200
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 5 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sswsticks

Growth

349 Aug 2026, 16:01 — 34 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:46 — 34 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 16:0111 Aug 2026, 00:46
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–35 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:4634no change
9 Aug 2026, 16:0134first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 5 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
14
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

670 reactions across 9 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52513183136565493738913.3%
custom 52513371771529121857611.3%
custom 5229113547484592291517.61%
custom 5231175294995432605466.87%
custom 5253612972948880824426.27%
custom 5231435265070889927375.52%
custom 5228723130662420885314.63%
custom 5251558071615914397304.48%
custom 5253979642896876465294.33%
custom 5253656579751832966284.18%
custom 5228783930219459559274.03%
custom 5233720883457064382263.88%
custom 5233738501412912586233.43%
custom 5228902097654677716223.28%
custom 5231329716249587202223.28%
custom 5237899156491627936111.64%
custom 5240397564737518972111.64%
custom 524256772151787311391.34%
custom 525382202189207946491.34%
custom 524268417526113894881.19%
7 further kinds436.42%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 670reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 1 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 10 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sswsticks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2025 to 1 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2025, 07:04 UTC346 views28 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🏡🌟🌟🔔 new pack ≠ @sswsticks отдать голос за канал

custom 524039756473751897211custom 52425677215178731139custom 52426841752611389488

29 Aug 2025, 17:03 UTC344 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

❄️🌟🏡🌟🐻🔔 new pack ≠ @sswsticks отдать голос за канал

custom 52470204687324622498custom 52471621038689853548custom 52472308319356568067

27 Aug 2025, 17:04 UTC327 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🖕🌟🐰🌟💋🔔 new pack ≠ @sswsticks отдать голос за канал

custom 523789915649162793611custom 52469093450436115636custom 52490110013905617506

26 Aug 2025, 04:56 UTC267 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @trueasasPhoto

👹👹👹 👹👹👹👹 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ wallpaper VS #.random bw boost

25 Aug 2025, 08:40 UTC931 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⌨🌟⚡🌟👕🔔 new pack ≠ @sswsticks отдать голос за канал

custom 52538220218920794649custom 52517174750321387004custom 52540093726604969394

22 Aug 2025, 07:36 UTC≈1,570 views86 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🌟🎁🌟🌟🔔 new pack ≠ @sswsticks отдать голос за канал

custom 523143526507088992737custom 523372088345706438226custom 523373850141291258623

20 Aug 2025, 05:08 UTC≈2,530 views193 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🦢🌟😏🔔 new pack ≠ @sswsticks отдать голос за канал

custom 525131831365654937389custom 525133717715291218576custom 525365657975183296628

18 Aug 2025, 05:37 UTC≈3,440 views101 reactions5 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🦢🌟🌟🦢 new pack ≠ @sswsticks отдать голос за канал

custom 525361297294888082442custom 525155807161591439730custom 525397964289687646529

6 Aug 2025, 18:29 UTC≈2,090 views90 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔔🌟🌟🌟🪸🍭 new pack ≠ @sswsticks отдать голос за канал

custom 523117529499543260546custom 522890209765467771622custom 523132971624958720222

5 Aug 2025, 18:59 UTC≈2,050 views109 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🧥🌟📎🌟🌟🔔 new pack ≠ @sswsticks отдать голос за канал

custom 522911354748459229151custom 522872313066242088531custom 522878393021945955927

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @sswsticks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,315,236 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sw sticks.” (@sswsticks), 34 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sswsticks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.