Channel
@ssvetayurievna
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
333subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001649115120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ssvetayurievna |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ssvetayurievna |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 333 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 329 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 328 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 328 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
90 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 27.8% | |
| custom 5389017756895041578 | 21 | 23.3% | |
| custom 5335037564241866546 | 13 | 14.4% | |
| custom 5908918553028861629 | 11 | 12.2% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 8.89% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.11% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#сегодня_на_домашнем И вот скажите мне: что может быть прекраснее дома? взрослая роскошь для меня сейчас выглядит именно так: никуда не торопиться, вкусно поесть, спокойно поработать и быть там, где хорошо
custom 53890177568950415785custom 53350375642418665462
Мои незакрытые гештальты… делитесь, кем бы вы работали ? 😅
❤🔥11custom 59089185530288616293🙏1
#инструкция_по_обращению_с_ёжиком Бывает, меня очень легко задеть. Если мне всё равно, я отшучусь и пойду дальше. Но если слово попало в душу, я буду долго носить его с собой, прокручивать в голове и тяжело проживать. Хотя внешне я, конечно, кремень🤨 Мне не нужны советы и попытки меня исправить. Мне нужно простое человеческое, чтобы меня принимали такой, какая я есть. Со всеми достоинствами, недостатками и странно…
custom 53890177568950415786😭3custom 53350375642418665462
Это не фильтр Это настроение 😍
❤🔥7custom 53890177568950415781custom 59089185530288616291
Если ваш вайб пятницы не такой - не зовите на вечеринки☝️😈
😁2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥3
План - лежать с котиком😻 Реальность - в Чебах по делам 🥲
custom 53350375642418665469
Ещё меня часто спрашивают: — Свет, а что будет? Я честно отвечаю: — Не знаю. Но знаю, что всё будет хорошо👌 я_не_ванга_я_света
😁4custom 53890177568950415783custom 59089185530288616292👍1🗿1
внутренняя_бабка_укрощает_льва Много раз слышала, "Львы всегда отстаивают свою точку зрения и хотят быть правыми" Я - воспитанный Лев💋 Не буду рычать, размахивать гривой и доказывать свою правду каждому встречному. Иногда признак ума - не победить в споре, а вовремя включить внутреннюю бабку👵: — Да-да-да…ммм...правда, что ли.....надо же.....😁
custom 53890177568950415782😁1
#за_мет_ки не спорю - наблюдаю Я никогда не обсуждаю в компаниях три вещи: экономику, политику и веру. Не потому, что мне нечего сказать. Как раз наоборот, я понимаю, как многое устроено и почему работает именно так. Особенно хорошо, это видно на примере ситуации с бензином. у каждого. есть. своя. точка. зрения. ффффсеее знают Причины, Последствия, Виноватых и Что нужно было сделать🙄 А я сижу, слушаю и думаю: Вы…
👍3custom 53890177568950415783custom 59089185530288616291
Возможно, уже в ближайшие полгода часть рутинных операций я передам ему. И перестану кошмарить мою Алёну😅 [по крайней мере, по тем вопросам, которые получится автоматизировать. по остальным расслабляться пока рано 😄]
custom 59089185530288616294👍2😁1custom 53890177568950415781
Я не думаю, что технологии способны полностью заменить специалиста. Но специалист, который умеет ими пользоваться, получает больше времени на идеи, решения и развитие. Собственно, поэтому я и поехала в Иннополис - смотреть, учиться и искать новые возможности для внедрения.
❤🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ssvetayurievna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Душевный Капитал” (@ssvetayurievna), 333 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssvetayurievna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.