Channel
@sssspletnidnevnikov1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
-9,916 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001915516220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sssspletnidnevnikov1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sssspletnidnevnikov1 |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 3 | -9,947 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 9,950 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:09 | 9,946 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 9,941 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 9,947 | +15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 9,932 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 9,933 | +18 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 9,915 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 9,916 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 9,919 | first reading |
142 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 142 (14 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 77,700 |
| Reactions total | 1,641 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,932 reactions across 133 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 971 | 24.7% | |
| ❤ | 583 | 14.8% | |
| 💯 | 428 | 10.9% | |
| 🤡 | 407 | 10.4% | |
| 😁 | 271 | 6.89% | |
| 🤮 | 197 | 5.01% | |
| 👍 | 121 | 3.08% | |
| 😐 | 110 | 2.80% | |
| 👎 | 91 | 2.31% | |
| 😭 | 57 | 1.45% | |
| 💊 | 53 | 1.35% | |
| 🥴 | 53 | 1.35% | |
| 💩 | 46 | 1.17% | |
| 🥰 | 45 | 1.14% | |
| 💘 | 40 | 1.02% | |
| 👏 | 34 | 0.865% | |
| 😍 | 33 | 0.839% | |
| 🙏 | 31 | 0.788% | |
| 😢 | 26 | 0.661% | |
| 🤝 | 26 | 0.661% | |
| 32 further kinds | 309 | 7.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 142 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,932 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sssspletnidnevnikov1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 142 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
#медошенька почему до сих пор не обсудили пиздастрадалицу дашуши? это же просто угар, как она из себя жертву строит и жалуется как ей плохо, но обязательно надо камеру поставить перед этими „страданиями“ оруу 😂
🤣11💘7💩2
#всячина 1) Меня никогда не перестанут смешить анонимные комментарии в салате, которые пытаются засрать объективно очень красивых девушек салата. про Ариану пишут что губы хуйня и что она солевая. Про Таю соду пишут какие уродливые губы и ресницы. Вишню постоянно трогают за ринопластику которая объективно улучшила ее внешность. Травкину называют гумоноидом и трансом. Все эти девушки очень хорошо выглядят, у каждой с…
❤9🤡4
#алисаорлова Кому было мало истории про кота Алисы которого она выкинула на улицу, ловите еще. У собаки распухла морда до жуткого состояния. В итоге после слов о ветеринарке наступило молчание. На вопросы отвечает нехотя (взято из комментариев архива), очевидно никто никуда пса не водил. Она фоткает и рассказывает про каждый свой пук в дневнике, а про ветеринарку ни слова))) В итоге из-за вопросов про собаку у Алиск…
❤17🤡3🤮2
#медошенька такая крутая , все фотки с разбитой коленкой , ну оторва вообще , не удачно с*сала или че ? для фото можно было бы и вытереть кровь , как бомжиха избитая стоит
🤣13🤡4❤2😍2
#deadbutterfliesinmystomach #sunshine вселенная схлопнулась. юджиниха и саншайн - лучшие подруги
🤣35❤6
#всячина какие же тупые комментаторы, которые пишут не рожаю потому что не потяну финансово, нет хаты и менталки. ну блять, так изначально доебывались не до простолюдинок, а девушек НЕ ИМЕЮЩИХ ФИНАНСОВЫХ МЕНТАЛЬНЫХ ПРОБЛЕМ С ХАТОЙ, ПОДДЕРЖКОЙ ХОРОШЕЙ СЕМЬИ, ОБРАЗОВАНИЕМ И БОГАТЫМ МУЖИКОМ как Перфилова, Алена и Муна. про тех кто ничем в жизни не занимается, потому что все у них есть(с Перфиловой не уверена лора не зн…
🤡41💯4
3️⃣ ТУР. 1 VS 1
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
🤮3
1) #perfilovalife Хочу жить в мире перфиловой и удивляться как ождик с той стороны земли падает. А не вот это вот всё (1) 2) #имяка Пришло без текста (2) 3) #julenochka #julianaglitchy то, что джуленочка не умерла - всем понятно, но откуда-то у нее постоянно прибавляется по чуть-чуть подписчиков, мб она где-то в крысу вкидывает самопиары?
👎4❤1
3️⃣ ТУР. 1 VS 1
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
#меттаморан 1) я в трихуе что маргинальщина в виде Меттаморана может спокойно расхаживать по гейвропе, в то время как в моём городе на улице к прохожему пристанут с проверкой доков ебашить в руку девушке ножом, ебануть чужую тачку мелкое воровство в магазинах = вот результат что будет если человек из снг поедет за границу потому что там в гейропах парады с голыми жопами гомосеков не самое страшное, страшное вседозво…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @sssspletnidnevnikov1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
3️⃣ ТУР. 1 VS 1
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
3️⃣ ТУР. 1 VS 1
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
2️⃣ ТУР. Второй опрос
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
2️⃣ ТУР. Первый опрос
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
1️⃣ ТУР. Шестой опрос
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
1️⃣ ТУР. Первый опрос
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sssspletnidnevnikov1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“〰 Переходник 〰” (@sssspletnidnevnikov1), 3 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sssspletnidnevnikov1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.