Sticker, posted without a caption
👎1
Signed zhra

Channel
@ssmodrn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,374subscribers
+122 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001448806807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ssmodrn |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ssmodrn |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 11,374 | -36 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 11,410 | +6 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 11,404 | +21 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 11,383 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 11,391 | +10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 11,381 | -13 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 11,394 | +14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 11,380 | +10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 11,370 | +30 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 11,340 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 11,349 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 11,350 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 11,343 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 11,345 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 11,348 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 11,347 | +36 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 11,311 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 11,312 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 11,313 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 11,314 | first reading |
528 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 528 (10 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 74,008 |
| Reactions total | 1,704 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 166 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20,574 reactions across 497 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8,843 | 43.0% | |
| 😁 | 4,183 | 20.3% | |
| ❤ | 2,823 | 13.7% | |
| 👎 | 1,831 | 8.90% | |
| 😐 | 1,291 | 6.27% | |
| 👏 | 1,118 | 5.43% | |
| 💔 | 485 | 2.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 498 of the 528 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,574 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 528 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
👎1
Signed zhra
🙋ویدئو بازی پرطرفدار Chicken shot🙋 فقط کافیه شکارچی خوبی باشی و مرغ هارو شکار کنی و پولت چند برابر کنی😍💵 💖توی سایت بت اینجا بازی کن و پیش بینی کن و پول در بیار😍 ⬅️امکان شارژ با کارت بانکی راحت و امن ⬅️تسویه حساب سریع بدون احراز 🎁هربار شارژ کنی 12% بیشتر شارژ میشی✅ 🎁اگ باختی هم 10% باختت سایت بهت برگشت میده✅ 🚨ادرس ورود به سایت: 💠http://betinja.bet/affiliates/?btag=2760677 💖فیلترشکن خود را روشن کنید و روی کشور مناس…
👎1
Signed zhra
بازی شکار مرغ این روزا خیلی پرطرفدار😍 توم میتونی بازی کنی و پولت چند برابر کنی 👌 از دستش نده✅ https://t.me/+x83BW_KQnT01ZGE0
❤1👎1
Signed zhra
حواشی خروج بازیکنان استقلال از ورزشگاه نقش جهان در پایان دربی 107 🆔@esteghlalmodrn
👍9
Signed 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪
وضعیت گردن عارف آقاسی پس از برخورد با کنعانیزادگان 🆔@esteghlalmodrn
👍23😐9❤3
Signed 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪
ازدحام در مسیر خروج بازیکنان استقلال از ورزشگاه نقشجهان 🆔@esteghlalmodrn
❤12👎2
Signed 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪
شکار لحظهای که حسین کنعانی به گلوی عارف آقاسی چنگ انداخت! باشگاه استقلال در پایان نیمه اول مدعی شد که این زخم گلوی عارف آقاسی از دید داور مسابقه پنهان مانده اما همانطور که در ویدیو میبینید موعود بنیادیفر کاملا این صحنه را دیده است! ضمن اینکه کنعانی در مصاحبهای که با خبرنگاران در پایان دربی ۱۰۷ داشت واکنش خاصی به این اتفاق نداشت و حتی چنین برخوردی را انکار کرد و گفت:«یادم نمیآید!» 🆔@esteghlalmodrn
👍42😐9❤3💔1
Signed 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪
افرین همیشه همینجورسرپایین مصاحبه کن اینجا استقلاله منم منم نداریم 🆔@esteghlalmodrn
❤80👍53👎3😐1
Signed Modrn
بیانیه همراه با تشکر کمیته انضباطی پس از دربی 107 کمیته انضباطی فدراسیون فوتبال: شهرآورد یکصد و هفتم میان تیمهای استقلال و پرسپولیس تهران با میزبانی شایسته شهر اصفهان و همکاری مطلوب هیأت فوتبال این استان و باشگاه سپاهان در ورزشگاه نقش جهان در فضایی آرام، منظم و حرفه ای برگزار گردید.بر اساس گزارشهای واصله بازیکنان و کادر فنی دو تیم با رعایت کامل اصول اخلاقی و مقررات انضباطی زمینه برگزاری شایسته و جوانمردانه این مساب…
😐21👍4👎3❤1
Signed 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪
لحظه درگیری کنعانی زادگان و آقاسی در محوطه جریمه پرسپولیس که منجر به خراش و زخم عجیب روی گلوی مدافع استقلال شد از زاویه دوربین فوتبالی 📹این صحنه هم از چشم موعود بنیادی فرد دور ماند و هم از چشم داوران VAR ! در حالیکه آقاسی گلویش را به موعود بنیادی فر نشان داده بود که چطور زخمی و خونی شده است اما نه بنیادی فر و نه کمک داور ویدیویی به این صحنه ورود نکردند!/فوتبالی 🆔@esteghlalmodrn
👍55😐4
Signed 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪
هممون یکیایم، تیم فرقی ندارد؛ واکنش زیبای عمری به سلفی با هواداران استقلال 🆔@esteghlalmodrn
👍107👏32❤11👎3😐1
Signed 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪
صالح حردانی، بازیکن استقلال: تیم ما امروز خیلی خوب بازی کرد/ 90 دقیقه جنگیدیم/ دم همه هواداران گرم که حمایت کردند/ می توانستیم برنده بازی شویم/ ناراحتی از نزدن ضربه ایستگاهی؟ نه اصلا این طور نیست. من اهل ضربه ایستگاهی زدن نیستم و یکی از بچه ها دوست داشت بزند/ ما هیچ درگیری نداریم و یاسر یکی از دوستان من است/ کادرفنی تصمیم گرفت که یاسر آسانی بزند و ما هم تمکین می کنیم/ تیم داوری خوب قضاوت کرد/ جز یک صحنه که عارف آقاسی…
👍71❤11👏2
Signed 𝓢𝓪𝓻𝓪
Showing the 12 most recent of 528 posts we hold for @ssmodrn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ssmodrn named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رسانه تحلیلی خبری مدرن” (@ssmodrn), 11,374 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssmodrn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.