Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

serendipity 🪭

@srthcssie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

248subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002105728319
TypeChannel
Username@srthcssie
Description• Véta — Elizabeth — serendipity — счастливая случайность
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/srthcssie

Growth

24810 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 248 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:00 — 248 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:4610 Aug 2026, 08:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 247–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:00248no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:46248first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.1%
avg views ÷ 248 subscribers
Avg views / post
204
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held13 (31 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total2,647
Reactions total254
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
927
Videos
284
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

254 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53933118952623739005722.4%
custom 54179530331725899054718.5%
custom 53346895859915498784316.9%
custom 53865706219687365402911.4%
custom 53933259441003959462710.6%
custom 5398025346991825909155.91%
custom 5465235756903601130155.91%
custom 531011511885866628693.54%
custom 539085579673931655751.97%
custom 529175681802282158341.57%
custom 539347768958993002431.18%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC46 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

my lo(v)e 🤩

custom 53933259441003959463custom 53933118952623739002custom 53980253469918259092custom 53346895859915498781

9 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC89 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026

каждый борется со своей никчемностью

custom 53933118952623739009custom 53346895859915498786custom 53980253469918259096custom 53933259441003959462

7 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC140 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

как же у нас в городе страдает сервис в общепите и как же неуважительно относиться посетители к персоналу(

custom 53933118952623739007custom 53346895859915498786

7 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC154 views31 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

бодрое утречко( 🌸

custom 539331189526237390013custom 53346895859915498788custom 53980253469918259097custom 53934776895899300243

6 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC171 views40 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😛

custom 541795303317258990519custom 539332594410039594612custom 53933118952623739009

4 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC209 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

если хотите поболтать, вот анон

custom 54179530331725899055

4 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC234 views48 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

with the exception of you, I dislike everyone in the room

custom 541795303317258990517custom 539332594410039594610custom 53865706219687365409custom 53346895859915498786custom 53933118952623739006

4 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC213 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

“to be cringe is to be free”

custom 539331189526237390011custom 54179530331725899056custom 53346895859915498784

31 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC350 viewsread 10 August 2026

🤩ассоциации от serendipity — вы как мифы древней греции с вас точка в комментариях 🪷 беру до стопа, возможно возьму выборочно сделаю позже

31 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC338 views30 reactionsread 10 August 2026

art has no aliens.

custom 53346895859915498788custom 53865706219687365407custom 54652357569036011307custom 53101151188586662863custom 53908557967393165573custom 52917568180228215832

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @srthcssie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 610,468 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“serendipity 🪭” (@srthcssie), 248 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/srthcssie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.