Channel
@srpstvo2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
67subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001775265141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @srpstvo2 |
| Description | НОВ КАНАЛ: https://t.me/serbianidentity |
| Created | 10 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/srpstvo2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 67 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 67 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 77.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 22.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2024 to 29 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Шиптари су наравно постали огорчени према Црној Гори и Црногорцима зато што неће да признају своју најчистију српску покрајину, Косово и Метохију. Са њим тако раде и милогорци. Ђукаш и Милатовић су рекли бјеше да су то наша уствари њихова браћа...
Ljudi,zapratite ova 2 naloga: -Srpskanacionalnaalijansa -Srpska_nacionalna_alijansa Kako bo stvorili nadmoć i superiornost na inatagramu nad ciganima,pederima i komunistima
Вријеме је сада да разокртивамо владу. Прије прије много година, хтјели смо да свргнемо Мила и преко избора је изгубио, али је сада дошао његов насљедник, а то је Јаков Милатовић. Сада ако погледамо став њихов према педерлуку, педерлук је добио још већи успон под владавином Милатовића. То је тако из разлога тог што је усвојен закон о одабиру пола, транџе са њиховом болесном идеологијом хоће да индоктринирају ђецу д…
❤🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
ПОКУШАЈ УСТАШКЕ ВЛАСТИ ДА ОТМЕ САНЏАК ЦРНОЈ ГОРИ: 3. маја успостављена је усташка власт на територији пљеваљског среза. Један је усташки жандармеријски вод успоставио жандармеријску станицу у Пљевљима. У свим станицама распоређено је било по 10 усташа изузев у Пљевљима, ђе их је било 14. Након тога наступили су преговори о Санџаку. То је био преговор различитих квислиншких и окупаторских комбинација. У вези са тим, …
👍2
КОМУНИСТИЧКА МРЖЊА ПРЕМА ЦРНОЈ ГОРИ - ГОРА ОД ОКУПАТОРА: Ово је прије свега дио о комунистичкој аутошовинистичкој мржњи према Црној Гори и Црногорцима. У некадашњем рату који су наши велики државници попут Крста Поповића и Павла Ђуришића изгубили, партизани су спровели асимилацију односно расрбизацију Црногораца. Мада, набавили смо и документе да су исти ти ,,ослободиоци" уништили Подгорицу са бомбардовањем као и цр…
Photo, posted without a caption
Ako se zapitate "kako neko može biti Pravoslavac i nacional socijalista/fašista u isto vrijeme"? Epa pogledajte onda šta onda SVETAC kaže o Hitleru, veliki teolog koji je Svetac čak sam priznaje da je Hitler svetac Evrope i Heroj svog Naroda,imate i njegovu knjigu u kojoj l Veliča Ljotićevske ideje.
👍5
Dokažite da BOG nije uzalud za nas umro, moramo da ga slavimo, i da se izborimo protiv demokratije,komonterne i ostalih satanističkih bolesti, pokažite da Isus nije umro džaba tako što ćete sprodoviti njegovu ideju borbe protiv satanizma širenjem ove alijanse koja je već ispunjena svim dokazima, odbacite sotonu, slavite Boga sina Isusa.
❤🔥1
https://youtu.be/N5_dcSnZNR4?si=S5LfrPXnmEsTYAj4 Ovo se mora posvuda proširiti,mi Srbi kao narod stalno griješimo što se tiče ovoga pitanja, zato je Srpski narod obasjan lažima kao što su "nacional socijalisti su mrzili Srbe"
МИШЉЕЊЕ ЦРНОГОРСКИХ ЗЕЛЕНАША О ХРВАТСКОЈ У КРАЉЕВИНИ ЈУГОСЛАВИЈИ: У времену Краљевине Југославије, ширила се псеудо-повијесна теза о Црвеној Хрватској од стране хрватских шовиниста пошто су искористили лошу ситуацију у Црној Гори у своје руке. Зеленаши су на то бурно реаговали и пошто их већина поистовјећује са усташама, вријеме је да то разокртијемо. Сада у њиховом листу Зета, ту је чланак под насловом Ко су Црног…
Ускоро иде нови видео.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @srpstvo2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 641,664 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Српство 2.0” (@srpstvo2), 67 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/srpstvo2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.