Channel
@sredabooksreadingclub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003795210191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sredabooksreadingclub |
| Created | 22 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sredabooksreadingclub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 30 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 27 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 25 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 25 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
35 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 62.9% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 8.57% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Знали ли вы, что Клайд Гриффитс (герой романа) и его реальный прототип носят одинаковые инициалы? Настоящего убийцу звали Честер Джиллетт (Chester Gillette). Героя романа — Клайд Гриффитс (Clyde Griffiths). Это не совпадение. Драйзер специально сохранил одинаковые инициалы — C.G., словно оставил читателю подсказку: перед нами художественный роман, но его корни уходят в реальную историю, которая когда-то потрясла вс…
❤2😱1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1😁1
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbsQ3X8tyzE/
Посмотрите как у нас было весело на прошлой встрече!!!😅 Огромное спасибо за монтаж нашему админу Кате❤️
❤🔥1
Что общего у Теодора Драйзера и Федора Достоевского... кроме имени?😂 Все мы в школе изучали «Преступление и наказание». Есть предположение, что идея романа пришла Федору Михайловичу после того, как он прочитал о реальном преступлении, произошедшем в Петербурге: молодой человек, раскольник (то есть, старообрядец), убил двух женщин. Это дело широко освещалось в прессе в 1865 г. С Теодором Драйзером произошла практиче…
❤5
Вдруг вам нужен файлик😅 Присоединяйтесь к нам.
👍3
Ну а впереди у нас "Американская трагедия" Теодора Драйзера.
❤1
Доброе утро! В прошлую пятницу мы встречались и обсуждали "Благие знамения". Несмотря на то, что большинство из нас так и не закончило чтение книги, мы все же смогли кое-что обсудить, и даже снять забавные видео. Как только смонтируем их, обязательно поделимся.🤗
❤3
У нас есть маленькая традиция: на встречи многие приносят что-нибудь к общему столу — легкие закуски, фрукты или что-то вкусное к чаю. Я сегодня захватила нектарины, виноград, немного мясных закусок и орешки. Если хотите — тоже можете что-нибудь принести, но это совершенно не обязательно. ❤️ И да, у нас все еще стоит бутылка апероля с прошлых встреч… А вот просекко — ни алкогольного, ни безалкогольного — сегодня не…
Прочитали ли книгу?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Всем привет! 😊 Как ваши дела? Напоминаю, что сегодня у нас встреча в SREDA Books Reading Club. Обсуждаем роман «Благие знамения». Ну что, как у вас дела с книгой? Прочитали или еще не успели? 😄 Признаюсь честно, я и сама сегодня совсем не готова к встрече. На этот месяц пришелся переезд в новый дом, и практически все мое время и силы ушли именно на него. Так что сегодня буду с удовольствием слушать ваши впечатлен…
❤2
SREDA BOOKS Reading Club pinned «🗓 Расписание SREDA Books Reading Club Мы встречаемся в книжном магазине SREDA Books в Ларнаке каждую последнюю пятницу месяца. Ближайшие встречи: 📖 31 июля — «Благие знамения» 📖 4 сентября — «Американская трагедия» 📖 2 октября — «Князь Света» 🎃 30 октября…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sredabooksreadingclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Прочитали ли книгу?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SREDA BOOKS Reading Club” (@sredabooksreadingclub), 30 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sredabooksreadingclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.