Channel
@sraha_goldenboy
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,554subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001362418817 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sraha_goldenboy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sraha_goldenboy |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @sraha_goldenboy/5639 · this entry28 Dec 2023, 07:25 UTC | @htrshaty/2203928 Dec 2023, 07:25 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @sraha_goldenboy/5640 · this entry31 Dec 2023, 18:35 UTC | @htrshaty/2204031 Dec 2023, 18:35 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @sraha_goldenboy/5645 · this entry30 Jan 2024, 08:34 UTC | @htrshaty/2204130 Jan 2024, 08:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @htrshaty/220487 Jul 2024, 18:37 UTC | @sraha_goldenboy/5653 · this entry7 Jul 2024, 18:39 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @sraha_goldenboy/5656 · this entry2 Aug 2024, 07:27 UTC | @htrshaty/220492 Aug 2024, 07:27 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @htrshaty | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @htrshaty (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 20 December 2023 to 3 December 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @sraha_goldenboy — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 1,554 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 1,556 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:09 | 1,556 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
58 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 53.4% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 36.2% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 10.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2023 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
لماذا نعرف ما يجب فعله... ولا نفعله؟ لأن الإنسان لا يتحرك بالعقل فقط، بل بثلاث طبقات: العقل - العاطفة - العادة. وغالبًا ... العاطفة والعادة تهزمان العقل بسهولة. نحن نعرف القرار الصحيح، نعرف السلوك الأفضل، نعرف ما يجب أن نتركه وما يجب أن نبدأه... لكن المعرفة شيء، والقدرة على التنفيذ شيء آخر تمامًا. في علم النفس، هناك 4 أسباب رئيسية تجعلنا نقف مكاننا: الصراع بين "ما أشعر به" و "ما أعرفه": العقل يقول: اترك. القلب يقو…
Signed 5loOdi 🐹
كل واحد فينا يعرف تمامًا ما يجب أن يفعله... لكن الغريب أننا لا نفعله. لماذا؟ هل لأن القرار صعب؟ أم لأن ال مشاعر أقوى من المنطق؟ قبل ما نلوم أنفسنا، خلّونا نفهم نفسيًا: لي نعرف الطريق... ومع ذلك نتردد في المشي فيه؟
Signed 5loOdi 🐹
ليس كل التغافل ل إبقاء الود !! هناك تغافل ل إبقاء الطاقة، وهناك تغافل ل غياب التقدير، وهناك تغافل ل انعدام الحوار، وهناك تغافل ل ضياع م قد يقال، وهناك تغافل ل انعدام قيمة العتاب، وهناك تغافل من شدة اليأس من تغير الطباع، وهناك تغافل من خيبة الأمل ، وهناك تغافل لسقوط أحدهم من القلب بلا رجعة، وهناك تغافل لكثرة ما تغافلنا عنه سابقا ..! وهناك تغافل لأن التدقيق ف أفعال البعض يؤذي، وهناك تغافل حتى نشكو بثنا وحزننا إلى اللّٰ…
❤1
Signed 5loOdi 🐹
أعلم جيدآ معنى أن تكون مثقلآ بالكلام ،محاصرآ بما لا يقال ، تهمّ أن تتحدث فتتراجع ، لأن الحروف تهرب منك كما يهرب الأمان من قلب خائف.أعلم كيف يختنق المرء حين تمتلئ نفسه بضجيج لا يسمع ، وكيف يذوب صوته بين رغبة البوح وخوف الندم.. هناك لحظات يصبح فيها الصمت أصدق من أي حديث ، لأنك لا تدري أي كلمة قد تدان بها ، و أي صدق سيستخدم ضدك يومآ ما.أن تكون بحاجة إلى الحديث ولا تجد من تصارحه ، أن تلتفت حولك فلا ترى سوى وجوه تحفظ لك …
Signed 5loOdi 🐹
سؤال وجواب…. لماذا يصبح الشخص لطيفًا مع الجميع... وقاسيًا مع من يحب؟ لأن القسوة هنا غالبًا ليست كراهية، بل انعكاس لعمق العلاقة. عندما نحب شخصًا، ترتفع حساسيّتنا معه، ويصبح أي موقف صغير قادرًا على تحريك مشاعر كبيرة. لذلك: 🔥 الأمان يجعلنا نُظهر أسوأ ما فينا: مع الغريب نتحكم في انفعالاتنا، أما مع من نحب فنسمح لمشاعرنا بالخروج دون تصفية لأننا نشعر أنه "لن يرحل". 🔥 الخوف من الفقد يولّد ردود فعل قاسية: أحيانًا الغضب مع ال…
👍1
Signed 5loOdi 🐹
ذهبت السبع العجاف (2017 - 2024) وبدأت سبع سنبلات خُضرْ بأذن الله ... تفائلوا ♡゙.
❤10
Signed Nosiba
كل يوم الصباح أسأل نفسك السؤال دا.. (شنو ابسط حاجه ممكن اعملها اليوم تخلي يومي دا احسن من امبارح؟؟! )✔️ و ركز كويس على كلمة (اعملها ) يعني م حاجه تحصل ليك او الظروف تجي معاك ❌ ممكن تكون حاجه بسيطة او مجهود زيادة المهم حاجه تخليك احسن من امبارح 🧡🌸 _ حاول م يعدي يوم الا و انت احسن من القبلو صدقني ح تفرق كتير 🧡🔥
❤6👍1
Signed Nosiba
البتقرا كلامي ده هل إنت كويس؟؟؟🥹 #Nosiba
👍6👎6
Signed Nosiba
"شعورك بالتشَتُّت الآن لا يعني أنك ستبقى هكذا طويلًا، بطريقةٍ ما ستأخذ الأمور مسارها الصحيح، فوضى الأفكار في رأسك ستترتَّب، القلق الذي يسكنك ستحلّ الطمأنينة مكانه، القرارات التي تتخبَّط فيما بينها سيختار الله لك أصلَحها مادُمت قد استخرته و دعوته و صبرت، و الغد الذي كان كابوسًا غير واضح المعالم سيصبح واقعًا جميلًا.. فقط المزيد من الصبر و الدعاء، و الثقة الحق في ربِّ الأرض والسماء."
❤1
Signed Nosiba
اشتقت ليكم😔😔❤️❤️❤️ #Nosiba
❤4
Signed Nosiba
رجاء الناس تشارك بى رايه وتساعده❤️
Signed Nosiba
عندي بت اهلي قرابة مباشرة كانت علاقتنا حلوة وروح بالروح اختلفنا وقطعنا تواصلنا وبعدها اتواصلنا وانا افتكرت خلاص المياه عادت لمجاريها لكن اتفاجا انها حظرتني ساي بدون اسباب ولمن جيت البلد فكت الحظر.. برضو اتجاوزت ده وم اشتغلت بالموضوع قبل شهرين عندنا خطوبة بت أهلنا مشيت لقيتها هناك طاعنتني بالكلام سكت برضو في الاخر قامت نهرتني وكوركت فيني كأني شافعة.. ابدا م اتوقعت منها... بشدة م انصدمت وم اتوقعت تعمل كده م قدرت ارد ع…
Signed Nosiba
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sraha_goldenboy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 488,651 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💌🔥إستشارات Rasta 🔥🖤” (@sraha_goldenboy), 1,554 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sraha_goldenboy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.