2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–48 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 13:32
47
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:31
47
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
74.5%
avg views ÷ 47 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held
19 (29 October 2025 – 25 July 2026)
Views total
70
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
53
Videos
4
Links
102
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
12
32.4%
🔥
11
29.7%
😁
10
27.0%
❤
4
10.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Опус 5 шығыпты. Естеріңде ма ана телефондар шығатын кезде кәдімгідей қызық еді, жүріп, қарап, Технодом аралап дегендей. Расында да каждый модель өзінің бір бустын алып келді. Шамамен Samsung galaxy S3 / S7 мен iPhone 3 / 7 кездері.
Қазіргі кезде өз басым аса қарамайды екем, көбіне телефон арқылы контент/кино жасау үшін фокус сияқты, бірақ айналам аса ананы көрдің ба, мынаны көрдің ба деп жатқан жоқ.
Вот осы агентте…
Elixir тілі жақында өздерінің сайтын жаңартыпты. Астында менің компаниямды көре аласыңдар)
——— ——— ——— ———
Seems like elixir updated its website. You can find our company icon at the button of the page)
https://elixir-lang.org/
Кейде агенттер үшін ‘тырысу’ күшін таңдау шаршатып жібереді. Қайсысы тез және де жақсы жұмыс атқаратынын іздеу өзі бір бөлек шаруадай. Үлкен шаруаға біраз тырысып кішісіне азырақ тырыссын деп ойлайсын. Мүмкін жәй ғана бір вариантты таңдап саған көмегі тиіп жатса басқасан көрмей қойған да жөн ба?
——— ——— ——— ———
Sometimes having variety of efforts to select from makes me tired. It’s kinda a job on its own to find the …
Егер байқамай қалсаңдар:
Шілденің 12-іне дейін Fable моделін қолданса болады, бірақ аптаға берілген модельдердің 50 пайызына дейін ғана рұқсат.
——— ——— ——— ———
In case you missed:
Extended: Fable 5 is included in your weekly limit
▎ Through July 12, you can use up to 50% of your weekly usage limit on Fable 5. If you hit your limit, you can continue on Fable 5 with usage credits. Fable 5 draws down usage faster than…
Шағын салыстырмалы тексеру жасадым. Егер мен жаратқан токендарды API арқылы төлеген күні қандай сомалар шығатынын білу себебімен. Калькляция үшін ccusage тулы қолданылды. Әзірше жұмыстан берілетін подпискалар өздерін ақтап жатқандай.
——— ——— ——— ———
Was a little curious on my token spending and wanted to make an experiment on how much should I pay for last 2 months period if used API based approach. Results are satis…
#til
Cmd/Ctrl + Shift + V командасы арқылы маркдаун файлдердің превьюын өз код редакторларыңда көре аласыңдар. Ыңғайлы. VS Code-те тексерілді.
——— ——— ——— ———
Run Cmd/Ctrl + Shift + V for previewing markdown(.md) files in your editor.
Мына жігіт маған ұйықта деп жатыр ғой дим. Не дерімді білмеймін даже)
——— ——— ——— ———
That’s claude seems to sending me to sleep. Such a caring. Thanks, I guess)
Elixir атасы Жозе Валиммен жолықтым. 13 жыл бойы керемет жұмыс атқарып жүр.
——— ——— ——— ——— ———
Had a chance to meet with Jose and that was an amazing experience.
Біздің бір коллегамыз Expert LSP-де(тіл серверінің хаттамасы) фулл тайм жұмыс істіп жүр, және күні кеше релиз кандидат шықты, өздерің тексерсеңдер де болады.
Контекст үшін: бұрын эликсирде 3 түрлі LS болатын: Elixir LS, Lexical, Next LS. Қазір солардың тәжірибесіне қарап бір ортақ нәрсе шығарылды. Күшті жаңалық.
——— ——— ——— ——— ———
One of our colleagues(Pawel) have been awesomely contributing to Expert LSP(official …
Жұмыстың чатынан шыққан қызық прикол:
Қиын кездер халықты мықты қылады.
Мықты халық С тілін ойлап табады.
С тілі жақсы күндер тудырады.
Жақсы күндері Питон разрабтары шығады.
Питонисттер ЖИ ойлап табады.
ЖИ(жасанды интеллект) вайб-кодерлерді тудырады.
Вайб кодинг инжинерлерді әлсіздетеді.
Әлсіз халық қиын кездерді тудырады.
——— ——— ——— ——— ———
Found it quite funny:
Hard times create strong men.
Strong men create C.…
😁8
Signed Sabit Rakhim
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sr_it_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Aerospace, не басқа window manager-ін қолданғандар бар ма? | Is there anyone who tried to use Aerospace or other window manager?
Иә | Yes10%
Жоқ | No80%
Толығырақ | More10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sabit: Personal IT Blog” (@sr_it_blog), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sr_it_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
