Channel
@squiziqdao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002268008646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @squiziqdao |
| Description | Squiziq DAO Связь: @Squiziq |
| Created | 28 March 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/squiziqdao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 23 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 28 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
16 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 37.5% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 31.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2025 to 7 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Папка 500-800+ ❗️ НАБРАНА ❗️ Фаундер: 1⃣https://t.me/squiziqcrypto Участники: 1⃣https://t.me/babkinacrypta 2⃣https://t.me/Psichodelic_CRYPTO 3⃣@chaintrend0 4⃣https://t.me/theexpert_crypto 5⃣https://t.me/MaxCryptoBlog 6⃣https://t.me/cryptosemenov 7⃣https://t.me/snowsnman 8⃣https://t.me/CRYPT0N_P2E 9⃣https://t.me/cryptoo_compas 1⃣0⃣https://t.me/gagarinmarafon Спонсоры (7.5$): 1⃣+ 2⃣+ 3⃣+ Админ 🌐 Отзывы 🌐 Чат
🔥2
Папка 100-300+ ❗️ НАБРАНА ❗️ Фаундер: 1⃣https://t.me/squiziqcrypto Участники: 1⃣https://t.me/blackbullusd 2⃣https://t.me/+kLvyYE-v7v9jYzhi 3⃣https://t.me/CryptoZavd 4⃣https://t.me/crypto_wallstreets 5⃣https://t.me/kmnonelove 6⃣https://t.me/Vorkaem_crypto 7⃣https://t.me/MiracleCryptoz 8⃣https://t.me/TampliersCRST 9⃣https://t.me/crypto_vachh 1⃣0⃣пост: https://t.me/adamincrypto /траф: https://t.me/Hanwokk 1⃣1⃣https:/…
🔥2
💼Папка 300-500+ ❗️НАБРАНА❗️ Фаундер: 1⃣https://t.me/squiziqcrypto Участники: 1⃣https://t.me/fastfood_crypto 2⃣с этого пост https://t.me/Djentyliman_cryptyet, сюда в папку https://t.me/CRYPTO_ARTEMON 3⃣Пост здесь: https://t.me/wafe_crypto Трафик сюда: https://t.me/PANYCH 4⃣https://t.me/chaintrend0 5⃣https://t.me/cryptom0nte 6⃣https://t.me/crypto_vachh 7⃣https://t.me/KirpichVKripte 8⃣https://t.me/cryshara 9⃣https://…
👍2🔥2❤1
💼Папка 100-300+ ❗️НАБРАНА❗️ Фаундер: 1⃣https://t.me/squiziqcrypto Участники: 1⃣https://t.me/crypto_wallstreets 2⃣https://t.me/acecrypto0 3⃣https://t.me/CrazyFrog1990 4⃣https://t.me/miningore 5⃣https://t.me/RainCryptoGem 6⃣https://t.me/Vorkaem_crypto 7⃣https://t.me/Izvsectnicrypto 8⃣https://t.me/volleyballer_working 9⃣- 1⃣0⃣https://t.me/MiracleCryptoz 1⃣1⃣https://t.me/CryptoAnv1l 1⃣2⃣https://t.me/+4IRUxdmkt4MzZGUy 1…
👍3❤2🥰2
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @squiziqdao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@squiziqdao named 15 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Squiziq DAO” (@squiziqdao), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/squiziqdao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.