Channel
@squid_kor_update
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,008subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003740012500 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @squid_kor_update |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/squid_kor_update |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:59 | 1,008 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 1,012 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 1,017 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 1,019 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,222 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧠 최근 정답 ⚡ @rodwlek · 방금 · Q. Squid의 수수료 구조는? ✅ @samdolhee · 10분 전 · Q. Arbitrum USDC를 Solana로 보낼 때 Squid의 일반적 순… ✅ @samdolhee · 12분 전 · Q. Axelar의 보안 모델 핵심은? ✅ @y0_vl · 13분 전 · Q. Squid 라우트가 단일홉이 아닌 경우는? ✅ @y0_vl · 13분 전 · Q. Axelar에서 검증인의 역할은? 🏆 오늘의 정답왕 · 🥇 익명 참가자 35회 · 🥈 @Bnbef 6회 · 🥉 @T0_5T 6회 지금 소통방에서 같이 풀고 있어요.
변하지 않는 것도 있습니다. 바로 $QUID의 총공급량. 👉 스테이킹 하러가기 📱 공지방 | 💬 소통방 | 📱 X #Squid #SquidKorea #QUID
🦑 Squid Router | 락업과 출금 수수료 없는 QUID 스테이킹 🫧 QUID 스테이킹이 시작되며, 별도의 락업 기간과 출금 수수료 없이 스테이킹 리워드에 참여할 수 있습니다. 공식 스테이킹 페이지에서 QUID를 예치하고 바로 스테이킹을 시작할 수 있습니다. 공식 링크와 CA만 확인해 주세요. $QUID 에어드롭은 없으며 Squid 팀은 먼저 DM을 보내지 않습니다. 👉 스테이킹 하러가기 📱 공지방 | 💬 소통방 | 📱 X #Squid #SquidKorea #QUID
🦑 Squid 한국 AMA 리캡 Fig가 한국 커뮤니티 질문에 직접 답했습니다. • Squid가 100개 체인을 연결하는 방식 • $QUID 스테이킹과 거버넌스 방향 • 수수료·보안 감사·환불 • 거래 추적과 Wallet Stack • KBW·피아트 온램프 계획 10개 핵심 답변 전체 보기 https://blog.naver.com/coineasy/224369538957 Squid Korea X https://x.com/SquidKorea/status/2085105821462180132 📱 공지방 | 💬 소통방 | 📱 X #Squid #SquidKorea #QUID
❤4
🧠 최근 정답 ⚡ 익명 참가자 · 방금 · Q. GMP(General Message Passing)란? ✅ @Q0_3Q · 2분 전 · Q. Axelar의 GMP가 가능하게 하는 것은? ✅ @Q0_3Q · 3분 전 · Q. Squid가 개선하는 주요 문제는? ✅ @Q0_3Q · 4분 전 · Q. Axelar 검증인은 어떻게 선정되나요? ✅ @Bia_77d · 5분 전 · Q. Squid의 3대 제품군에 해당하지 않는 것은? 🏆 오늘의 정답왕 · 🥇 @Nann3786 5회 · 🥈 @Apod109 3회 · 🥉 @Bia_77d 3회 지금 소통방에서 같이 풀고 있어요.
오늘 함께해주신 Fig와 Squid 커뮤니티 여러분, 감사합니다! 🦑 오늘 핵심 답변과 시간상 답변하지 못한 주요 질문은 확인 후 한국어 요약으로 다시 공유하겠습니다.
❤3
🔴 지금 시작했어요! 🎤 Squid 팀 Fig와 함께하는 텍스트 AMA 🗓 8월 5일(수) 20:00–20:30 KST · 이 소통방에서 텍스트로 진행 🎙 참여: Fig (Squid 팀) 🗣 실시간 한국어 통역 지원 🔴 지금 진행 중! 채팅으로만 진행돼서 편하게 참여할 수 있어요. 한국어로 질문하면 Fig의 답변을 한국어로 바로 통역해드려요! ❓ 사전 질문: 아래 버튼에서 질문만 보내면 +20 XP (1인 3개까지) 🙌 당일 참여: AMA 중 대화에 참여하면 +15 XP
🦑 Squid Router | 락업과 출금 수수료 없는 QUID 스테이킹 🫧 QUID 스테이킹이 시작되며, 별도의 락업 기간과 출금 수수료 없이 스테이킹 리워드에 참여할 수 있습니다. 공식 스테이킹 페이지에서 QUID를 예치하고 바로 스테이킹을 시작할 수 있습니다. 공식 링크와 CA만 확인해 주세요. $QUID 에어드롭은 없으며 Squid 팀은 먼저 DM을 보내지 않습니다. 👉 스테이킹 하러가기 📱 공지방 | 💬 소통방 | 📱 X #Squid #SquidKorea #QUID
🔔 6시간 뒤 시작해요! 🎤 Squid 팀 Fig와 함께하는 텍스트 AMA 🗓 8월 5일(수) 20:00–20:30 KST · 이 소통방에서 텍스트로 진행 🎙 참여: Fig (Squid 팀) 🗣 실시간 한국어 통역 지원 ⏳ 시작까지 3시간 3분 채팅으로만 진행돼서 편하게 참여할 수 있어요. 한국어로 질문하면 Fig의 답변을 한국어로 바로 통역해드려요! ❓ 사전 질문: 아래 버튼에서 질문만 보내면 +20 XP (1인 3개까지) 🙌 당일 참여: AMA 중 대화에 참여하면 +15 XP
🎤 Squid 팀 Fig와 함께하는 텍스트 AMA 🗓 8월 5일(수) 20:00–20:30 KST · 이 소통방에서 텍스트로 진행 🎙 참여: Fig (Squid 팀) 🗣 실시간 한국어 통역 지원 ⏳ 시작까지 3일 10시간 채팅으로만 진행돼서 편하게 참여할 수 있어요. 한국어로 질문하면 Fig의 답변을 한국어로 바로 통역해드려요! ❓ 사전 질문: 아래 버튼에서 질문만 보내면 +20 XP (1인 3개까지) 🙌 당일 참여: AMA 중 대화에 참여하면 +15 XP ✨ New Era: 아래 버튼에서 이메일 등록·인증 시 +50 XP (1인 1회)
🧠 최근 정답 ⚡ @Ttioplmj · 방금 · Q. Squid가 사용하는 라우팅 엔진은? ✅ @Ttioplmj · 3분 전 · Q. Axelar 토큰의 심볼은? ✅ @Han0p · 5분 전 · Q. Squid에서 다룰 수 있는 토큰 종류가 많은 주된 이유는? ✅ @Han0p · 7분 전 · Q. 크로스체인 스왑이란? ✅ @Han0p · 8분 전 · Q. Arbitrum USDC를 Solana로 보낼 때 Squid의 일반적 순… 🏆 오늘의 정답왕 · 🥇 @YYL3Y 4회 · 🥈 @Bia_77d 3회 · 🥉 @Bnbef 3회 지금 소통방에서 같이 풀고 있어요.
❤1
🦑 $QUID가 공식 출시됐습니다. 거래소와 앱, 그리고 Squid에서 바로 만나보세요. 새로운 시대는 지금 시작됩니다. 그리고 그 시작은 $입니다. Squid Korea X https://x.com/SquidKorea/status/2084636196526059792 Squid 공식 발표 https://x.com/squidrouter/status/2084625410998866030 공식 CA (Base) 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 공식 링크와 CA만 확인해 주세요. $QUID 에어드롭은 없으며 Squid 팀은 먼저 DM을 보내지 않습니다. 📱 공지방 | 💬 소통방 | 📱 X #Squid #SquidKorea #QUID
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @squid_kor_update. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 373,412 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“스퀴드 한국 공지채널 (Squid)” (@squid_kor_update), 1,008 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/squid_kor_update.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.