Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SQLpedia | Базы данных

Channel

SQLpedia | Базы данных

@sql_wiki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,913subscribers

-99 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526752830
TypeChannel
Username@sql_wiki
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sql_wiki

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9136,0125,962.56 August 2026 — 6,012 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,012 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,008 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,006 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,007 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,998 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,994 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,992 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,983 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,976 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,969 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,959 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,955 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,958 subscribers4 October 2026 — 5,945 subscribers11 October 2026 — 5,944 subscribers17 October 2026 — 5,941 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,939 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,937 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,931 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,929 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,925 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,921 subscribers6 November 2026 — 5,917 subscribers10 November 2026 — 5,913 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,898–6,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 11:495,913-4
6 Nov 2026, 16:095,917-4
3 Nov 2026, 16:215,921-4
31 Oct 2026, 15:585,925-4
28 Oct 2026, 18:415,929-2
26 Oct 2026, 02:305,931-6
23 Oct 2026, 12:155,937-2
20 Oct 2026, 22:175,939-2
17 Oct 2026, 16:505,941-3
11 Oct 2026, 07:365,944-1
4 Oct 2026, 21:565,945-13
25 Sept 2026, 06:585,958+3
16 Sept 2026, 19:565,955-4
13 Sept 2026, 07:165,959-10
9 Sept 2026, 09:355,969-7
4 Sept 2026, 11:025,976-7
29 Aug 2026, 12:275,983-9
26 Aug 2026, 06:435,992-2
23 Aug 2026, 12:055,994-4
19 Aug 2026, 14:075,998first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1944.2%
❤1637.2%
👍614.0%
❤‍🔥12.33%
😱12.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
9.52%
2 of 21 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
746
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,480
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHxuPV316 March 20266 March 2026
2W5zFJreLuP129 September 202629 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 29 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 13:09 UTC746 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJreLuP

Отчет отвечает на вопрос, что уже произошло В рекомендательных системах важнее другой вопрос — что произойдет дальше, что конкретный человек захочет увидеть в следующий раз. Данные для этого берутся те же, с которыми вы и так работаете: действия, клики, просмотры. Дальше в дело вступает машинное обучение. 30 сентября в 18:00 мск пройдет бесплатный вебинар karpovꓸcourses и AI Talent Hub ИТМО «Как устроена ваша лента…

❤3

20 Apr 2026, 06:30 UTC≈2,170 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

​​Как читать BUFFERS в EXPLAIN ANALYZE и находить I/O-узкие места в PostgreSQL PostgreSQL показывает использование буферов для каждого узла плана, и когда вы научитесь читать эти числа, то сможете точно понять, где ваш запрос тратил время на ожидание операций ввода-вывода (I/O), а где этого не происходило. Перейти к статье | SQLpedia

👍4❤‍🔥1

15 Apr 2026, 06:03 UTC≈2,090 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026

​​Как мы строим OLTP-ядро: от API-контрактов до eBPF-проб В предыдущих статьях я подробно разбирал фундамент нашей новой OLTP-СУБД: принцип Restrictive by Default (fail-closed вместо деградации), отказ от VACUUM в пользу UNDO-лога и концепцию Unified Storage. Перейти к статье | SQLpedia

❤1

13 Apr 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,660 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

​​Как мы строим OLTP-ядро: от API-контрактов до eBPF-проб В предыдущих статьях я подробно разбирал фундамент нашей новой OLTP-СУБД: принцип Restrictive by Default (fail-closed вместо деградации), отказ от VACUUM в пользу UNDO-лога и концепцию Unified Storage. Перейти к статье | SQLpedia

❤2

6 Apr 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 5 November 2026

​​Мониторинг SQL Server Always On в Zabbix Если у вас в инфраструктуре стоит Always On Availability Groups, вы наверняка бывали в такой ситуации: в SSMS всё зелёное, дашборд показывает «Synchronized», пользователи звонят с жалобами на тормоза. Перейти к статье | SQLpedia

3 Apr 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,500 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @ba_wiki

​​Гайд системного аналитика по корректировкам витрин Данный материал подходит для тех сотрудников, которые не имеют опыта работы или недавно пришли на проект, связанный с хранилищами данных. Перейти к статье | BApedia

❤4😱1

1 Apr 2026, 06:31 UTC≈1,260 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

​​Temporal Tables в MS SQL Server: история изменений Temporal tables позволяют следить за историями изменений уровне движка. SQL Server сам хранит полную историю изменений каждой строки — без триггеров, без дополнительного кода и без самописного аудита. Перейти к статье | SQLpedia

❤2

30 Mar 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

​​CPU 80%. Как найти проблемный запрос в ClickHouse? CPU 80%, память на пределе, диск нагружен. Запросы тормозят. Расчёты не завершаются. Сервер на грани. Что же делать? Перейти к статье | SQLpedia

👍2

26 Mar 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 5 November 2026

​​PostgreSQL: транзакции, блокировки и почему Serializable падает Если вы когда-либо сталкивались с тем, что запросы внезапно «висят», транзакции ведут себя странно, а UPDATE из двух сессий приводит к неожиданным результатам — эта статья поможет понять, что происходит внутри PostgreSQL. Перейти к статье | SQLpedia

24 Mar 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 5 November 2026

​​Как отчисление одного студента может закрыть всю кафедру. Нормализуем БД и избавляемся от аномалий В прошлой статье мы детально разобрали функциональные зависимости. Возможно, после нее у вас, как и у многих, остался закономерный вопрос: зачем нам вообще так париться, выискивая эти зависимости? Как это применяется в проектировании баз данных? Перейти к статье | SQLpedia

23 Mar 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Планы на последнюю пятницу марта: заглянуть к коллегам на Avito Database meetup Мы узнали, что 27-го ребята собираются, чтобы разобрать пару архитектурных болей. Отличный повод посмотреть на чужой прод и сравнить со своими решениями. В программе: — чек-лист по защите данных в DBaaS; — FoundationDB против Cassandra 5 в реальных условиях; — нетипичный путь масштабирования S3. Можно дойти до их офиса, а можно просто …

19 Mar 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 5 November 2026

​​Определение фактического профиля нагрузки в PostgreSQL и динамические состояния БД Когда вы знакомитесь с документацией по какой-то системе в части базы данных, то обычно характер нагрузки определяется исходно в архитектуре проекта. Но если система определена архитектором как OLTP, но в действительности может вести себя в некоторые периоды времени как OLAP. Нормально ли такое поведение, и каким образом мы можем оп…

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @sql_wiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Базы данных | Access, SQL, Big Data
@databases_secrets · 30,012
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
Data Science. SQL hub
@sqlhub · 36,025
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Секреты аналитики | Data Science, BI, Tableau
@analytics_secrets · 46,814
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
LEFT JOIN
@leftjoin · 41,485
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Инжиниринг Данных
@rockyourdata · 23,679
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SQLpedia | Базы данных” (@sql_wiki), 5,913 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sql_wiki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.