5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -206. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,263–2,531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 19:05
2,294
-60
11 Aug 2026, 13:36
2,354
-141
8 Aug 2026, 03:01
2,495
-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:33
2,500
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:09
2,500
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 2,294 subscribers
Avg views / post
402
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (6 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
3,218
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
10
35.7%
🎉
9
32.1%
🕊
5
17.9%
🐳
2
7.14%
👏
2
7.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐸 APU — THE WHOLESOME FROG ON GRAM
A community-driven meme project built around culture, community, and good vibes.
APU is bringing the spirit of the legendary wholesome frog to the TON ecosystem, powered by a growing community of believers and frens.
🐸 Strong Community
⚡ TON Ecosystem
🌐 Community Driven
💎 Built for the Long Term
Join the movement. Discover APU.
📜 CA: "EQAoXv44WiabFDXrdONz5Jj6vnMHEtnwcbSrLf6I-Pb…
$SOL gem — $ONLYMARMS
tiny mcap but the chart looks like it wants to send. floor is concrete rn, every test of support bounces hard. the kind of chart that makes u wish u sized up more at entry
saw this in a whale tracker bot. 2 known profitable wallets entered today
HBrfYZgeLKdSvBBGnGkvAK4563pq8oBGpgNFAaespump
For promo, VIP group or bundle launch DM @tuf_fg
$ワニーサ 👀
someone just dropped a fat bag into this — like 50+ SOL in one buy. on-chain doesnt lie. the holder count went from 200 to 800 in the last hour which is insane for something this early
community tg is actually active and not just bot spam for once
DM9jZWaBDhSVfKN63EQdbvwKNsMfM1GyJquZaRFNpump
For promo, VIP group or bundle launch DM @tuf_fg
$SHARKCAT
this thing just ate through resistance like nothing. sellers completely dried up, every dip in the last hour got bought within seconds. the txn flow is all green — whoever is accumulating wants this badly
volume spiked to 3x average with zero marketing. organic af
7tsiSR4b774u1prqAxfcWKgfQYavCDNBwK3xyYG8eR3F
For promo, VIP group or bundle launch DM @tuf_fg
new sol play — $ACAT
low cap with a chart that reminds me of early $BONK vibes honestly. the structure is almost identical — tight consolidation, organic holder growth, and then boom. nfa obviously but im keeping a close eye on this one
the memes coming out of their tg are actually fire which usually matters
0xfaacb60c231c75733b4f09ca1b4f8f6bbb912d7e
For promo, VIP group or bundle launch DM @tuf_fg
$SIF
not gonna write a thesis here. chart speaks for itself. go look at the 1h and the 4h. both are in breakout structure. volume confirming. holders increasing. the only question is whether u get in now or wish u did later
put a small bag in. if it works it works, if not i lose a dinner. risk reward is there
AcPqEaR9LmNj6grvx28QKCfUmsg48GpT4ZZpfjh7o9Du
For promo, VIP group or bundle launch DM @tuf_fg
$SOL alpha — $FEETCOIN
smart wallets are loading and not many ppl are talking about this yet. thats literally the best time to look at something. by the time everyone knows its usually too late. saw 3 different tracked wallets ape in the last 20 min
buyer to seller ratio is like 8:1 rn. thats not normal
GdBrZVWtqzSSV3Zbi7KP9uG6x1X6gtVMCAozUGE8pump
For promo, VIP group or bundle launch DM @tuf_fg
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sprontogemmm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JUNGLE APE” (@sprontogemmm), 2,294 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sprontogemmm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.