Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SPERMIX

Channel

SPERMIX

@sprmix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

149subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002372850801
TypeChannel
Username@sprmix
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 20 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sprmix

Growth

149150149.57 August 2026 — 150 subscribers8 August 2026 — 150 subscribers14 August 2026 — 149 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 149–150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:22149-1
8 Aug 2026, 19:47150no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:18150first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

238 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 598119272938262424418678.2%
custom 5985295273553827925187.56%
custom 5981133948460210660177.14%
custom 5981262419521967220125.04%
custom 598103340757077942131.26%
custom 598336162773756211720.84%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2024 to 31 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sprmix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 December 2024 to 31 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Dec 2025, 15:21 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 8 August 2026

❄️ Этот канал стал музеем Как там ваша мемблядия? Какие мемы были смешные?

20 Jun 2025, 10:19 UTC≈2,910 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

👨‍🦳 Как ваши миллионы с БЛУЭМА поживают?

custom 59811927293826242448

13 Jun 2025, 19:37 UTC≈2,470 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 59811927293826242447

24 May 2025, 14:59 UTC≈1,730 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 59811927293826242449

18 May 2025, 15:43 UTC≈1,480 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❄️ Мораль сей басни такова Шутки шутками про Володимира, но многие из «комьюнити» не заслуживают ничего, кроме наёба. Многие ликуют неудачам публичных людей, но лишь единицы радуются их успехам. Поэтому спрос порождает предложение и появляются всякие разные желтушники, которые изливаются желчью на утешение своей токсичной аудитории. За столько лет вы бы могли уже принять истину, что вас будут ебать до тех пор, пок

custom 59811927293826242449

18 May 2025, 00:13 UTC995 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❄️ А что случилось? GeysTon нелестно отзывается о тех, с кем на одном кружке развлекался и играл в танки. Неужели именно так выглядит настоящая мужская дружба? @sprmix

custom 59811927293826242446

17 May 2025, 23:46 UTC773 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто-нибудь, объясните этому желтухану, что Спермикс проведёт в судах весь 2025 год по другой причине. @sprmix

custom 59811927293826242449

17 May 2025, 19:25 UTC784 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍑 Неужели вам так нравится, когда вас ебут? Вам так понравилось прошлый раз? Или я уже не пидарас для вас? Зачем вам токен в мёртвой сети, лудоманы? @sprmix

custom 598119272938262424413

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sprmix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SPERMIX” (@sprmix), 149 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sprmix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.