3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 194–196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 18:46
194
-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:46
196
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:21
196
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 26s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
75
46.3%
😍
18
11.1%
🔥
15
9.26%
❤🔥
11
6.79%
💋
11
6.79%
🍓
9
5.56%
💅
7
4.32%
💯
7
4.32%
👍
4
2.47%
👏
3
1.85%
🤝
2
1.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 8 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spotmarket_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 8 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💎SPOT выходит в офлайн.
Скоро открываем нашу физическую маркет-зону SPOT × VI Club на Лесной улице, напротив ДЕПО.
Здесь можно будет познакомиться с локальными брендами вживую: потрогать вещи, примерить, посмотреть посадку, забрать карточку с QR и следить за новыми дропами.
А для брендов это возможность выйти в офлайн без открытия своего магазина: рейлы, примерка, трафик, контент и поддержка SPOT.
Скоро покажем б…
Как покупать у локальных брендов без ошибки? 😎
Смотри не только на фото: проверяй состав, посадку, детали, доставку и возврат.
SPOT собирает локальные бренды в одном месте — чтобы выбирать было проще и спокойнее
Сохрани чек-лист перед следующей покупкой 😶🌫️
С нуля до бренда, который знают
RAWEN и FARINJ — два разных пути, одна цель: создать что-то своё. Как они начинали? С какими проблемами столкнулись? И почему у одних получается, а у других нет?
Полный выпуск — скоро на нашем YouTube Подпишись, чтобы не пропустить ❗️
SPOT в ритме города — рассказываем о трех новых локальных брендах, о которых стоит знать.
Dagettla
Это про продуманный крой, асимметрию и внимание к каждой детали. Бренд умеет органично вписать сложный дизайн в повседневный гардероб — вещи служат долго и выглядят как знак принадлежности к своему сообществу.
The Damb
Ручная работа и смелый визуальный посыл. Не для массового потребителя, а для тех, кто хочет заявить …
SPOT — маркетплейс локальных дизайнеров, где стильные находки совсем скоро станут ближе 🖤
Скоро вы сможете заказывать изделия у любимых брендов проще, открывать для себя новые имена и делать покупки безопаснее. Следите за запуском — мы уже близко!
💄 Почему RAWEN никогда не появится на Wildberries? 🤫
Всё просто: философия этого бренда не совместима с массовым конвейером. RAWEN — это эстетика локального ателье, где каждая вещь создается лимитировано, с характером и особым вниманием к каждому шву. На гигантских маркетплейсах среди сотен одинаковых вещей такая самобытность просто затерялась бы.
Для тех, кто устал от безликого масс-маркета и ищет свой уникальный …
Крупные факапы бывают у всех — в бизнесе, в создании бренда, в предпринимательстве. Главное не избегать их, а уметь справляться, делать выводы и двигаться дальше 🎯
Мы ценим, что дизайнеры Spot открыто делятся таким опытом. Благодаря этому вокруг брендов формируется честное локальное комьюнити, а клиенты лучше понимают: за каждым изделием стоит путь, качество и внимательное отношение к деталям
🔗 А интересные эксклюз…
Делимся подборкой четырёх брендов, которые точно стоит посмотреть на SPOT📌
Сохраняйте подборку и переходите на сайт по ссылке — совсем скоро вас ждёт ещё больше подборок, брендов и новых дизайнерских находок на SPOT 🖤
❤11🔥6💋4🤝2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @spotmarket_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SPOT” (@spotmarket_ru), 194 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spotmarket_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
