Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Про деньги в спорте

Channel

Про деньги в спорте

@sport_biz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

546subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001919715331
TypeChannel
Username@sport_biz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sport_biz

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5355495426 August 2026 — 535 subscribers7 August 2026 — 535 subscribers13 August 2026 — 542 subscribers20 August 2026 — 543 subscribers26 August 2026 — 549 subscribers2 September 2026 — 548 subscribers10 September 2026 — 546 subscribers5466 August 202610 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 35 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 533–551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 22:37546-2
2 Sept 2026, 01:04548-1
26 Aug 2026, 17:03549+6
20 Aug 2026, 09:16543+1
13 Aug 2026, 17:57542+7
7 Aug 2026, 10:32535no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:02535first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

266 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12747.7%
❤5119.2%
👍3713.9%
👏228.27%
🤝114.14%
💯62.26%
🤷‍♂41.50%
🤔31.13%
⚡20.752%
🤣20.752%
👎10.376%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sport_biz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC80 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Нейминг без вывески Вы точно помните завирусившиеся фото с закрытыми логотипами Gillette и Levi's на прошедшем ЧМ. Так вот, я к вам с продолжением: две недели назад Gillette красиво закрыл эту историю. В наших медиа это прошло практически незамеченным, а зря. Посмотрите ролик – действительно креативно и красиво. Молодцы! Сразу внесу поправку: большинство цеховых медиа механику описывало неверно. На самой арене никак…

🔥5👏3👍2

4 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC134 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кейс не равно модель Последнюю неделю по всем каналам ходит кейс перуанского «Депортиво Мунисипаль». Вы его уже наверняка видели: клуб разбил футболку на тысячу спонсорских мест и все распродал мелкому бизнесу. Вдобавок кейс еще и Гран-при Каннских львов взял – футболка получилась отличная. Все максимально трогательно, вирусно и красиво. Удивительно, но эта схема дошла и до меня – уже в виде одного из запросов на ра…

🔥7❤4💯2

3 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC≈1,070 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥5👏2👍1

30 Jul 2026, 18:44 UTC227 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Футболка стоимостью €240 млн Пару дней назад совет директоров Реала опубликовал финотчет за 2025/26. Большинство дежурно концентрируется на гигантской годовой выручке – более €1,2 млрд. Я же обратил внимание вот на что – сумме, которая висит на одной майке. Считаем. За последние два месяца Реал переподписал двух своих главных партнеров: Emirates остается титульным спонсором до 2031 года за €100 млн в год против пре…

🔥6❤4👍3

27 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC489 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Почему брендам мало ваших охватов На прошлой неделе разбирал коммерческую модель одного проекта, который пришел на консультацию. В процессе разбора несколько раз подчеркнул, что для определенного типа брендов проект может дать огромную узнаваемость, и вокруг нее надо строить разговор со спонсором. В ответ получил недоуменный вопрос со ссылкой на пост про имитацию бизнеса: но вы же сами писали, что это пустое?! Объяс…

🔥5❤3👍3👏3⚡1🤝1

26 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC239 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Инфантино в ООН – почему нет Несколько дней назад завирусилась новость о том, что Трамп хочет видеть Инфантино следующим Генеральным секретарем ООН. Все вовремя, место скоро освобождается: нынешний Генсек Антонио Гутерреш уходит в декабре. Первая реакция у большинства – помимо усмешек, конечно – повышение. Из футбола в вершины мировой дипломатии – красивая карьерная история. Если попробовать отнестись к этому серь…

🔥4👍2💯2❤1🤣1🤷‍♂1

23 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC≈1,010 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⠀⠀⠀⠀ Unsponsored Project: отсутствие логотипа – лучшая реклама Сегодня в Нью-Йорке стартует чемпионат США по легкой атлетике. Он в «Большом яблоке» впервые с 1991 года. Но суть поста не в этом – 80 участников выйдут в экипировке без единого логотипа. Причем я имею в виду не спонсорские лого, а лого производителя на форме. И за все это заплачено. Ведет проект Bandit – нью-йоркский бренд беговой экипировки. Компания з…

🔥9👏3❤1

21 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC439 views33 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Из категории «мысли вслух» Подумалось, что FIFA и Инфантино должны благодарить не Трампа за рекордные успехи ЧМ-2026, а конкретно NFL – теневого соавтора успеха. Вот смотрите: все 11 американских площадок – это стадионы NFL, ни один не вмещает меньше 60 тысяч. Специально для ЧМ вообще ничего не строилось: арены, операционные команды, инфраструктура трансляций, питание, безопасность – все уже было на месте и десятил…

🔥19👍7❤5💯2

19 Jul 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,070 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥8👍4❤3🤔1

17 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC289 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сколько спонсоров у сборной Аргентины? Много – но никто не знает точно Это не шутка, но цифры все равно впечатляющие. SponsorUnited насчитывает 64 контракта. Деловая пресса, в зависимости от издания, пишет про 80 с лишним. Леандро Петерсен, коммерческий директор AFA – Ассоциации футбола Аргентины, в майском интервью называет 115 компаний. Разброс почти в два раза, но это не небрежность аналитиков. Федерация подписыва…

🔥9👏3🤔1🤣1🤷‍♂1

15 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,380 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Куда пропал World Cup? На фоне негатива и непрекращающихся скандалов FIFA – космических цен на билеты, пауз на водопой, красной карточки Балогуна, меня преследует одна мысль, которой хочу поделиться. Но сначала небольшая вводная. Если мы спросим футбольного болельщика, любит ли он ЧМ, то позитивный ответ получим практически всегда. А затем спросим, любит ли он FIFA – и в ответ, скорее всего, получим усмешки, саркас…

🔥7❤6👍4🤝2⚡1👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sport_biz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Про деньги в спорте” (@sport_biz), 546 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sport_biz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.