Channel
@spoort_hub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
104,588subscribers
-2,971 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001277257398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spoort_hub |
| Description | ⚫️رسانه مستقل و مردمی اسپورت هاب⚫️ 🔷️پوشش اخبار ورزشی و خبرهای غیرورزشی مهم روز دنیا 🗣️گپ: https://t.me/sporttt12 ارتباط: @Adzsad |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spoort_hub |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 104,588 | -2,971 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:22 | 107,559 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 09:47 | 107,559 | first reading |
187 posts held, back to 4 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 139 of 187 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 187 (4 October 2026 – 10 October 2026) |
| Views total | 216,939 |
| Reactions total | 1,113 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Oct 2026, 23:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,113 reactions across 137 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 354 | 31.8% | |
| 🤣 | 298 | 26.8% | |
| 👍 | 156 | 14.0% | |
| 💔 | 86 | 7.73% | |
| 👎 | 59 | 5.30% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 4.85% | |
| ❤🔥 | 41 | 3.68% | |
| 🖕 | 38 | 3.41% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 1.71% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.27% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.18% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.18% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 139 of the 187 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 187 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2026 to 10 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚽ لیورپول 🏴 - 🏴 منچستر سیتی 🏆 لیگ برتر انگلیس 🏴 🕔 یکشنبه ساعت ۱۹:۰۰ 📍 ورزشگاه آنفیلد 🎲 با بیش از ۶۵۰ نوع آپشن پیشبینی 👆 ضرایب شگفتانگیز و بیمه صد درصدی 📊 نگاهی به آمار دو تیم: ✅ لیورپول: ۵ برد، ۴ تساوی و ۱ شکست در ۱۰ بازی اخیر. ✅ منچستر سیتی: ۹ برد و ۱ شکست در ۱۰ بازی اخیر. 📈 میانگین گل در ۱۰ بازی اخیر لیورپول: ۲.۵ گل در هر بازی. 📈 میانگین گل در ۱۰ بازی اخیر منچستر سیتی: ۳.۶ گل در هر بازی. 🧠 آگاهانه پ…
❤1
رئال بد جوری ریدهههه تگری زدهه
Signed #Ali
⚽️😨 11 بازی و 20 تاثیر مستقیم روی گل تو این فصل @Spoort_hub
❤5
العربیه اعلام کرد که در اثر اصابت مستقیم شلیک موشک بالستیک از سوی نیرو های انصارالله به ترمینال شماره 3 فرودگاه ریاض تاکنون 6 نفر کشته و بیش از 70 نفر زخمی شدهاند. @Spoort_hub
🔥4🤣3
کونده چه نمره ی خوبی گرفته @Spoort_hub
🤣7
Signed F@rzad
بعضی وقتا هم کسی نیست که خرابش کنه @Spoort_hub
❤6
Signed #Ali
بارسلونا هم با نتیجه ضعیف ۳ بر صفر ختافه رو برد 😏 بریم واسه بازی رئال کبیر😍 @Spoort_hub
🤣9
Signed F@rzad
#Shadow
👍2❤1❤🔥1
آخرین آهنگی که گوش دادین چی بوده؟ خودم : باغ _ یاس @Spoort_hub
❤2
Signed F@rzad
پشمامممممم ایکس جی چلسی از بورنموث کمتره ولی 5 تا گل زده😂😂😂🔥🔥🔥 @Spoort_hub
🤣3
Signed #Ali
درخواست آزادی حمید رسایی نماینده ی مخالف استفاده از فیلترشکن تو اکثر فیلترشکنا : @Spoort_hub
🖕7🤣3❤1
کانالی که همیشه در مسیر ورشکست کردن سایت های شرطبندی حرکت کرده همین چنل آرون تیپه👇😈 🔴دریافت فرم 🥇آمار ثابت 90 درصد برد 💯 ✅فقط کافیه چند روز فرم هاش رو دنبال کنید... JOINJOIN
Showing the 12 most recent of 187 posts we hold for @spoort_hub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚫️Sport hub” (@spoort_hub), 104,588 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spoort_hub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.