Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

слово пацана confession ↺

@spknaconfession

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

68subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003386862409
TypeChannel
Username@spknaconfession
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spknaconfession

Growth

6812 Aug 2026, 13:18 — 68 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:13 — 68 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 13:1812 Aug 2026, 22:13
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67–69 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:1368no change
12 Aug 2026, 13:1868first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
67.6%
avg views ÷ 68 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held18 (22 April 202619 July 2026)
Views total138
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1628.6%
🍓1323.2%
🍾610.7%
❤‍🔥58.93%
🕊47.14%
💘35.36%
🤝35.36%
🏆23.57%
🐳23.57%
💋11.79%
😇11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026

Выбрали время когда тейк кидать у меня премка два часа назад кончилась

19 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC44 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟😻 t.me/D1strict89 🍼 🌟🌟🌟 🥹🎁🔡 🤍avigation 🤩🤩😻 давно искали ролевую по фандому «Слово Пацана: кровь на асфальте» с каноничным сюжетом? может, устали от того, что любимые роли оказываются занятыми? тогда, я предлагаю рассмотреть наш информационный канал только что открывшейся ролевой - «Район 89». 🤩🥹✔️🤩🤍ther 🤍ost's🥹 🪄🪄🪄🤩🤩administration’s ⭐️🤍 🤩😀🤩🤩😀⭐️📼🤍ules⭐️ 🤩🤩😉🍼🤩🤩🤩😉✔️😉🥹🥹 🎀 🤩🤩🔀 〽️ 🌟lot 😉🤍❌🍼 😉🫀 𖡻 🍼character's list😉😉🤍🍼 :

17 Jul 2026, 15:39 UTC51 viewsread 12 August 2026

остались ли вообще ролки/флуды по слово пацана? очень хочу вступить или же создать с кем-то... : #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒

10 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC71 viewsread 12 August 2026

есть ли кф по мареям? дайте ссылке умоляю #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒

6 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC84 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Пр мне очень грустно тт мои видео в рек не пускае Тгк: Алая моль ТТ - janie0_o Неанон Грация #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒

🍾32🍓2💋1

6 Jul 2026, 06:53 UTC74 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

я скоро умру от недостатка контента по ним неанон скарлетт : #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒

🍓31

2 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC78 viewsread 12 August 2026

И правда все вымерли, слава богу : #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒

2 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC82 viewsread 12 August 2026

Здравствуйте, а фд вообще ещё жив? Я опоздала на 3 года, посмотрела только сейчас и мне в целом понравилось. Контента по СП вообще почти нет. Думаю, что нужно делать ещё : #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒ 🌟:: надеюсь что все умерли

30 May 2026, 21:19 UTC125 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Очередной коллаж по очередной аушке с желтасами в которой Вова замученный студент, а Вадим его ангел хранитель🫰 : #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒

🕊42🏆2

29 May 2026, 14:50 UTC108 viewsread 12 August 2026

БЛИН ГДЕ ПОСМОТРЕТЬ СЛОВО ПАЦАНА БЕЗ ПОДПИСКИ СРОЧНО : #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒

29 May 2026, 13:31 UTC104 viewsread 12 August 2026

НУ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА НУ СКИНЬТЕ ВЫ АРТЫ, ЭДИТЫ И ФАНФИКИ С ФАНТИКОМ И ЕРАЛАШЕМ НУ ПЭЖЭЭЭЭ : #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒

29 May 2026, 12:44 UTC102 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

молю напишите фанфик где в финале выживут все, я ненавижу что в финале половина моих любимых персонажей умерли💀 : #тейк ⪼ @spknacf_bot . ˒˒

🤝3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @spknaconfession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,379,964 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“слово пацана confession ↺” (@spknaconfession), 68 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spknaconfession.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.