Channel
@spelliotblog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002673735422 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spelliotblog |
| Description | Правила: За слово фл*фф полагается смертная казнь. Фл*фф спеллиотов не существует. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spelliotblog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 93 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 93 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
395 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 395 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 30 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И так…видимо всё же блог умрёт окончательно. Новый сапп больше не будет Спектором из-за некоторых причин. Я всё же дам последний шанс этому блогу, но не думаю что это поможет Если до 11.01 не найдутся новые саппорты канал станет просто архивом навсегда #важно #отадм
❤26
🤩 :: Доброго времени суток, люди. Спрашивается вопрос, вы действительно хотите возвращения Эллиота? Я не считаю его присутствие необходимым, но видимо вам очень хочется. И блог также называется в честь сочетания наших имён!! Как мило, не думаете? Кстати о милоте. Коты или собаки?
❤23
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤10
📍 :: Я вспомнил кое что интересное. Для вас же тоже надо сделать что-то особенное? Хотя почему я спрашиваю, конечно же так и есть. Это же людские традиции! Ждите сюрприз. 🤩
❤24
📍 :: Добрый вечер. Полагаю что скоро новый год. Я изучил этот называемый праздник и его традиции. И тогда ко мне пришла идея: Отпраздновать его с моим Эллиотом! Уверен, он будет рад подарку. А если нет, то кому какое дело? Он должен прыгать от радости только за то, что я смотрю на него.
❤25
📍 :: Ты принимаешь слово "НЕТ"? Я не собираюсь что либо делать для тебя. Можешь продолжать дальше скитаться, мне плевать на тебя.
❤19
📍 :: Ты даже не настоящий Нуб... Будет забавно увидеть реакцию остальных когда они узнают что я могу "создавать" кого либо идентичными им. Они перестанут доверять друг другу, они перестанут верить себе. Вдруг они тоже бессмысленные копии появившиеся на свет только ради забавы настоящего бога? Или я просто возьму оригинального Нуба и запру с Эллиотом, а тебе сотру все воспоминания, оставив лишь мысли, навязанные мно…
❤16
📍 :: Отлично. Хороший мальчик. Но на самом деле мне не нужно твое мнение чтобы забрать тебя. Не думай что можешь повиновать мною как вздумается, (не) Выживший. Но с тобой будет скучно.
❤15
📍 :: А ты забавный. Хочешь присоединиться к Эллиоту? Он нуждается в компании, ведь он, как человек, социальное существо которое зависит от общения с другими особями его вида. 📍
❤19
📍 :: Я не делаю себе каких либо органов по которую можно определять женское и мужское, так что нет.
❤23
📍 :: А ск🔠ль🔠о у т🔠бя?📍
❤14
📍 :: Я не знаю кто это. Но в контексте данного комментария, неужели так люди меня называют?... Я сильно удивлюсь если их уровень развития выше "Многочлена". 📍
❤18
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spelliotblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 743,481 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“~ { Ꮪᴩᴇlliᴏᴛ ϸɭσɠ }~ [🍕🎩]” (@spelliotblog), 93 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spelliotblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.