Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Speeky | Corvox

Channel

Speeky | Corvox

@speeky_chat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

17,450subscribers

-4,747 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003614549350
TypeChannel
Username@speeky_chat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 10 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/speeky_chat

Growth

17,45022,19719,823.57 August 2026 — 22,197 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,197 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,192 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,087 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,993 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,845 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,755 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,677 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,541 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,345 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,172 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,157 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,097 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,910 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,817 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,648 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,306 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,901 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,697 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,524 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,323 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,928 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,738 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,265 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,946 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,450 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 25 days, net -4,747. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,738–22,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 05:2817,450-496
1 Sept 2026, 02:3817,946-319
31 Aug 2026, 01:4418,265-473
30 Aug 2026, 02:5718,738-190
29 Aug 2026, 06:1818,928-395
28 Aug 2026, 07:2519,323-201
27 Aug 2026, 07:0919,524-173
26 Aug 2026, 07:2819,697-204
25 Aug 2026, 04:4419,901-405
23 Aug 2026, 22:2420,306-342
22 Aug 2026, 06:3620,648-169
20 Aug 2026, 21:0320,817-93
19 Aug 2026, 22:5220,910-187
18 Aug 2026, 21:4621,097-60
17 Aug 2026, 21:3621,157-15
16 Aug 2026, 22:2621,172-173
15 Aug 2026, 16:2621,345-196
14 Aug 2026, 01:0421,541-136
12 Aug 2026, 21:5421,677-78
11 Aug 2026, 22:0221,755first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 10 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 17,450 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held43 (10 May 20261 September 2026)
Views total53,037
Reactions total1,175
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 02:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 32s
Average length
3m 46s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,960 reactions across 42 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,62855.4%
🤬2,09617.5%
🥱1,79215.0%
🤯2772.32%
👍1751.46%
🔥1511.26%
🤣1211.01%
990.828%
💘750.627%
👌690.577%
💔600.502%
😐510.426%
😁390.326%
❤‍🔥380.318%
😨300.251%
😭300.251%
😢280.234%
😱280.234%
🗿200.167%
🌭190.159%
23 further kinds1341.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,960 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
420
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 42 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
336
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @speeky_chat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 May 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 17:12 UTC687 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Запускаем розыгрыш на 5 мест в ЗБТ! 5 мест - 5 номинаций! 1. Лучшая аватарка чата! Вы предлагаете нам новую аватарку, мы с командой выбираем лучшую и ставим! (Должна быть совместима с новым названием! Название начинается на С (английскую) 2. Лучшее лого приложения! Вы предлагаете нам логотип, условия те же, что и в первом пункте! 3. Лучший девиз нашего мессенджера! Объясняю: Вы предлагаете нам девиз, которой буде

🐳9🤪2🤷‍♂2🥱1

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

30 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,550 views53 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

39🐳5🔥4🥱4🍓1

Signed dontFound

26 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC≈2,390 views20 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @hoff_vpnPhoto

🎉 РОЗЫГРЫШ ПОДПИСОК HOFF VPN 🎉 Совместно с Speeky Chat разыгрываем 10 призов для быстрого и комфортного доступа к VPN! 🏆 Призы: 🥇 1–3 место — ключ HOFF VPN на 6 месяцев или эквивалент стоимости подписки на баланс бота. 🥈 4–6 место — ключ HOFF VPN на 3 месяца или эквивалент стоимости подписки на баланс бота. 🥉 7–10 место — ключ HOFF VPN на 1 месяц или эквивалент стоимости подписки на баланс бота. 📅 Итоги розыгрыш

10🥱7🔥2👍1

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

26 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC≈2,210 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Какие у вас предположения, что будет в конкурсе на доступ к ЗБТ? Поделитесь предположениями)

🌭14🔥1

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

26 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈2,190 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Для тех, кто хочет сделать свой лого и предложить - первая буква C (английская)

🤔8🔥3

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

26 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,150 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Как видите, мы полноценно посвящаем вас в нашу работу. Отныне мы будем стараться делать так всегда. Ранее у нас не получалось, потому что нечего было показывать, а теперь мы готовы выйти к вам в свет, показывать, над чем именно мы работаем! Нам важно ваше мнение, всегда было важно! Спасибо, что вы оставляете свои реакции, делитесь мнением, общаетесь с нами и не остаетесь равнодушными! Это очень ценно!

23🥱3🙉2

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

26 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,930 views17 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Poll

какой логотип лучше

  1. 134%
  2. 225%
  3. 316%
  4. 46%
  5. Никакой, хотим лучше42%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🕊105🔥1🥱1

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

26 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,770 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Задумываемся над новым логотипом и теперь мы хотим узнать ваше мнение. Выберите, какой логотип вам нравится больше, мы всегда слышим ваши мнения и предложения! Если же вам не нравится ни один логотип или вы хотите его доработать, то можете предложить свой, мы рассмотрим!)

12👾3🥱3

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

25 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC≈2,200 views77 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Итак, работа кипит, уже скоро мы сможем показать полноценные наработки, чтобы вы понимали, какой проект мы вам хотим показать и выпустить! Также, в скором времени мы наладим полноценную связь команды и аудитории, чтобы вы в любой момент имели возможность задать вопрос о проекте, а новую информацию вам говорил либо владелец, либо вся команда модерации (мы оперативно работаем над этим)! Также, я напоминаю, что старт

59🥱12🔥3🤣2🫡1

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

25 Aug 2026, 08:56 UTC≈2,160 views57 reactions30 Starsread 2 September 2026

Мнения разделились, но большее количество людей хотят увидеть доработанный до идеала дизайн и интерфейс с последнего запуска ОБТ! Мы вас услышали, конечно, мы не оставим без внимания то, что люди хотят получить и новый дизайн, поэтому мы доработаем то, что уже было и добавим новинку, чтобы понравилось практически каждому (всем так или иначе не угодишь) Благодарим вас за обратную связь!

49👍3❤‍🔥2💋2🥱1

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

24 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC≈2,610 views65 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Не, ребят, честно, вопрос был задан во время изменений, чтобы понять, какой дизайн вы хотите, чего вы ждете в самом мессенджере, но я удивился, сколько людей готовы поддержать актив в чате своим негативом (черный хайп, тоже хайп) Но поехали по пунктам: 1. Проект развивается, причины отсутствия работы были указаны на несколько постов выше 2. Проект не закроется, тгк не удалится 3. Негатив свой вы можете оставить при

55🥱5💋3💘2

Signed 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕤 ℝ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕖𝕧

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @speeky_chat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTCAnonymous Poll745 voters

какой логотип лучше

  1. 134%
  2. 225%
  3. 316%
  4. 46%
  5. Никакой, хотим лучше42%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTCAnonymous Poll1,140 voters approx.

Чего вы ждете в ближайших обновлениях?

  1. Полировка существующего функционала (без добавления крупных новых функций)53%
  2. Сервера64%
  3. Платформа для создания ботов38%
  4. Инструментарий для бизнеса15%

The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 140,757 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Speeky | Corvox” (@speeky_chat), 17,450 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/speeky_chat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.