Channel
@speaking_club_dvfu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
496subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002066964249 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @speaking_club_dvfu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/speaking_club_dvfu |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 496 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 498 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 500 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 504 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 510 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 509 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 509 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
66 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 63.6% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 18.2% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 6.06% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.52% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡Dear students! We haven’t seen each other in the classroom for such a long time and have truly missed our participants, so we decided to get together again and have prepared an engaging topic for discussion. You are cordially invited to attend the forthcoming session of the Club devoted to current political issues and their discussions in the format of ’What’s on Political Agenda today?’ 📅When: 29.05 ⌛Time: 16:50…
💘1
And the winner is… 🥁 ✅ Option 🅰️: "I'm buying a new beach towel tomorrow because summer is almost here!" 🏖️ Here's why! 📚 In English, we use the Present Continuous (am/is/are + verb-ing) to talk about fixed plans or arrangements in the near future — especially when a specific time (tomorrow, next week, this weekend) or intention is mentioned. Summer being "almost here" adds a sense of imminence, which fits perfect…
❤2
Cast your vote!
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Hello, English learners! Can you feel it? Summer is just around the corner – the days are getting longer, the ice cream shops are opening, and everyone's mood is lifting. Let's check your grammar with a near-future summer scenario. 🍦☀️ 🎯 Which option is correct for talking about a planned or expected action very soon (before summer officially starts)? Option 🅰️: "I'm buying a new beach towel tomorrow because summe…
❤1
Phrase of the week - For a song🎶 And the new phrase, and again timeless Shakespeare... In the 16th century, this phrase appears in one of Shakespeare's plays. It is connected with Edmund Spenser and his gift of a poem to Elizabeth I. She wanted to pay him one hundred pounds, but her treasurer, Lord Burghley, exclaimed: "What! All this for a song?" Since then, a new idiom has been created meaning something that c…
🔥1
Phrase of the week - At the drop of a hat🎩 How often do you do something very quickly, without planning, without hesitation? In such situations we can say that we do something at the drop of a hat: when you do it, you do it immediately without stopping to think about it. ⚡️ This phrase came from American Old West, it refers to the practice of signaling the start of a fight, duel, or race by dropping a hat, requiri…
❤5
And the winner is… 🥁 ✅ Option 🅰️: "Since the beginning of spring, I have been enjoying the warmer weather every single day." ☀️ Here's why! 📚 In English, we use the Present Perfect Continuous (have/has been + verb-ing) to talk about an action that started in the past and is still happening now — especially when we want to emphasize the duration or the ongoing nature of the activity. The word "since" (since the beg…
❤2
Cost your vote!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
🌞 Hello, English learners! May is already here — the days are sunny, the gardens are blooming, and summer feels just around the corner. Let's test your grammar with a true spring scenario. 🌿🌸 🎯 Which option is correct for talking about something that started before May and is still happening now? Option 🅰️: Since the beginning of spring, I have been enjoying the warmer weather every single day. ☀️ Option 🅱️: Sinc…
Phrase of the week - To face the music🎵 Sometimes we do stupid things and then we have to face the consequences of our actions. For such situations there is an idiom in English - To face the music The idiom means to accept the consequences of one's actions, especially when they are negative or unpleasant. But do not confuse this with the phrase "Feel the music," which has no such meaning.🧐 1. If she lied to me, …
🔥3❤2🤩2
And the winner is… 🥁 ✅ Option 🅰️: «By the end of this month, I will have lived here through three beautiful springs.» 🌷 Here's why! 📚 In English, we use the Future Perfect tense (will have + past participle) for actions that will be completed before a specific time in the future — in this case, the end of this month. The phrase "by the end of this month" signals a deadline. It means that when that moment arrives, …
❤1🔥1😍1
Cast your vote! ✨
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @speaking_club_dvfu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Cast your vote!
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Cost your vote!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Cast your vote! ✨
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 27 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chill Speaking Club ☕️” (@speaking_club_dvfu), 496 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/speaking_club_dvfu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.