Channel
@spdag
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
182subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001984062554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spdag |
| Created | 3 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 6 times, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spdag |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @auditgovru/257621 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC | @spdag/692 · this entry21 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @auditgovru/258024 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC | @spdag/695 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC | 1.00 | 4.8 hours |
| @auditgovru/25904 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC | @spdag/700 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC | 1.00 | 2.5 hours |
| @auditgovru/257722 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC | @spdag/693 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC | 0.96 | 72 minutes |
| @auditgovru/258228 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC | @spdag/696 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC | 0.96 | 2.8 hours |
| @auditgovru/258329 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC | @spdag/697 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC | 0.95 | 3.4 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @auditgovru | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 2.7 hours | @auditgovru (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @auditgov. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 14:22 | 182 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 183 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:04 | 186 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 187 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 188 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 185 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 185 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 186 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Счетная палата уделяет особое внимание сфере спорта, в том числе эффективности использования средств, направляемых на строительство спортивных объектов, подготовку резерва и проведение соревнований: 🔹 аудит расходов, направленных на создание спортобъектов и их оснащение; 🔹 проверка трех тренировочных центров Минспорта России: «Новогорск», «Озеро Круглое» и «Ока». Так, проверка Счетной палаты выявила, что построенны…
Счетная палата оценила эффективность расходов на обновление оборудования для исследований и разработок ведущих научных организаций. Господдержка предоставлялась в форме грантов, всего с 2021 по 2024 год их получили 218 научных организаций в 38 регионах страны. Общий объем финансирования составил 54,6 млрд рублей, в том числе 46,7 млрд рублей из федерального бюджета, - сообщил по итогам проверки аудитор Счетной палат…
В 2025 году Счетная палата провела аудит распоряжения объектами недвижимости, которые поступили в госсобственность в связи с конфискованным коррупционным имуществом. По итогам проверки было рекомендовано усилить межведомственное взаимодействие при управлении таким имуществом и пересмотреть законодательные ограничения, препятствующие его приватизации. В настоящее время Росимуществом и ФССП России актуализировано сог…
Президент утвердил Основы государственной политики в сфере кадетского образования В 2022 году при проверке образовательных учреждений Следственного комитета России Счетная палата выявила системную проблему в сфере кадетского образования в целом по стране. При наличии более 5,8 тыс. таких организаций отсутствовали единые подходы к содержанию, качеству программ, обеспечению учебного процесса и правилам поступления. Ка…
Проверка Счетной палаты выявила не только снижение проходимости водных путей, но и простой годного техфлота и недостаточное обновление судов. В проверяемом периоде в администрации бассейнов внутренних водных путей поступило 44 новых судна. При этом 88 % имеющихся судов техфлота старше 30 лет.
👍1
Анализируя комплексную модернизацию служб занятости в регионах, Счетная палата выяснила, что нет единого инструмента для сбора данных о результативности таких мер господдержки. Это затрудняло оценку эффективности работы регионов в сфере занятости и контроль за соблюдением стандартов. По рекомендации Счетной палаты на Единой цифровой платформе «Работа в России» Минтрудом был разработан специальный функционал для форм…
Счетная палата добилась жесткой привязки списания бюджетных кредитов к реальному вводу объектов. При проверке реализации новых инвестпроектов (НИП) было выявлено, что Омской области в августе 2025 года были списаны 286,6 млн рублей по бюджетному кредиту на реконструкцию дороги. При этом сам объект — животноводческая ферма, ради которой строилась дорога, — ввели в эксплуатацию только в сентябре 2026 года, хотя изнача…
При проверке исполнения бюджета Федерального фонда ОМС было выявлено, что в отдельных случаях средства обязательного медицинского страхования могли находиться на счетах страховых медицинских организаций до 10 дней, прежде чем попасть в больницы и поликлиники. Счетная палата рекомендовала сократить срок оплаты до 2 рабочих дней с момента поступления средств от территориального фонда ОМС. После внесения рекомендованны…
В сфере мониторинга качества медицинской помощи Счетная палата проанализировала меры государственной политики по достижению национальной цели — повышению ожидаемой продолжительности жизни до 78 лет. Один из важнейших факторов здесь — качество помощи пациентам с болезнями системы кровообращения. Однако на момент проверки отсутствовал единый механизм мониторинга соблюдения медицинскими организациями порядков оказания …
По итогам одной из проверок системы медицинского страхования Счетная палата рекомендовала Федеральному фонду ОМС провести внеплановые проверки в регионах с целью выявления случаев предоставления недостоверных сведений в отчётности. В ходе реализации этой рекомендации было установлено, что в расчётах субвенции для Московской области на 2024 год учли более 35,6 тыс. иностранных граждан и лиц без гражданства, полисы ко…
Неиспользуемые субсидии на развитие Дальнего Востока и Арктики возвращены в федеральный бюджет. Как этого достигли? В 2025 году Счетная палата проверила деятельность АО «Корпорация развития Дальнего Востока и Арктики» и выявила, что на счетах его дочерних обществ годами копились неосвоенные остатки бюджетных средств. Субсидии выделялись на создание инфраструктуры территорий опережающего развития (ТОР), но по факту н…
👏1
Комментируя результаты проверки системы внутренних водных путей, Первый заместитель председателя Комитета Государственной Думы по транспорту и развитию транспортной инфраструктуры Павел Федяев отметил, что в управлении отраслью накопился ряд системных проблем: вложения в инфраструктуру растут, а отдача в виде доступной для судоходства протяженности путей и грузопотока – снижается. По мнению Павла Федяева, это сигнал…
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @spdag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Счетная палата Республики Дагестан” (@spdag), 182 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spdag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.