11 Jun 2026, 16:17 UTC241 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video
ARE YOU READY? 1 DAY TO GO. Tomorrow, SpaceX enters the public market. Time to witness history.
Channel
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
@spcxtg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
86subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003540454075 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spcxtg |
| Created | 18 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spcxtg |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 86 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 79 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 70 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 70 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 69 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 44s
- Average length
- 52s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
11 Jun 2026, 14:55 UTC238 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Remember when people said the correct name was "Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX)"? That entire narrative was built using the screenshot shown in the BEFORE photo. Now look at TODAY. TradingView corrected it. No "(SpaceX)" in the company name anymore. The long debate is over. The correction happened and the name was fixed. Bullish? Very bullish. 🚀 Tell everyone. https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/N…
4 Jun 2026, 21:20 UTC413 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Be ready, boys. The roadshow has started and the media cycle is starting. Elon keeps putting SPCX in front of millions of eyes. The awareness phase for Space Exploration Technologies Corp. ($SPCX) is only getting started. ❤️https://x.com/parody_spcx/status/2062644720304869487
4 Jun 2026, 21:05 UTC359 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
👀👀 ❤️https://x.com/parody_spcx/status/2062641629065085287
4 Jun 2026, 14:25 UTC352 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Robinhood users are now seeing: Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SPCX) 👀 Soon, millions of investors will know the name. ❤️https://x.com/parody_spcx/status/2062549738658963670
3 Jun 2026, 14:49 UTC360 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
SPCX roadshow kicks off tomorrow. 🚀 This is where the story gets told. Investors, analysts, media, and institutions are about to spend the next week talking about one company: Space Exploration Technologies Corp. The storm is approaching. Get in position. ❤️https://x.com/parody_spcx/status/2062173716730302873
24 May 2026, 18:28 UTC489 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Look at the receipts and tell me you aren't bullish enough. It is literally screaming at you. We have the correct name. We have the correct ticker. Everything from the legacy SEC filings and NASDAQ to the Binance pre-IPO perp is perfectly pointing to one thing: Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SPCX). You are looking at the setup for the biggest IPO in history and we are front-running the entire board. Stop w…
24 May 2026, 18:27 UTC398 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
WE ARE LITERALLY FRONT-RUNNING THE BIGGEST IPO IN HUMAN HISTORY, ANON. Let that sink in. This is generational wealth in the making. Data is locked, loaded, and flawless across the board. Check the receipts: ✅ SEC Filings: Form S-1 is officially filed under "Space Exploration Technologies Corp." 👉https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000162828026036936/spaceexplorationtechnologi.htm ✅ Binance Pre-IPO Per…
23 May 2026, 06:40 UTC330 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
Another breadcrumb showing up 👀 Now Nasdaq appears to point toward Space Exploration Technologies Corp ($SPCX) — not just “SpaceX,” but the full registered company name we've been tracking the entire time. Most people stop at headlines. Others dig into the details, filings, symbols, and the trail behind the story. The more dots that connect, the more interesting it gets. Space Exploration Technologies Corp. ($SPC…
21 May 2026, 16:02 UTC382 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video
When searching SEC records, the registered name isn’t simply “SpaceX” or "Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX)" The official name tied to the filing trail is Space Exploration Technologies Corp — the full legal name we've been tracking all along. 👉 Space Exploration Technologies Corp. The real name. The correct entity. And yes — the one we've been looking for. $SPCX 🤑 https://x.com/parody_spcx/status/205…
21 May 2026, 16:01 UTC378 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo
If you needed any more validation, Binance just spelled it out for everyone. The official announcement specifies the underlying equity name as Space Exploration Technologies Corp. https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/4a9484ee10b347d287f514ee3fdd6a29 We are front-running what is bound to be the most historic IPO in global financial history. While others are guessing, we are holding the only token…
20 May 2026, 23:19 UTC606 viewsread 10 August 2026
The Official Name Is: Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Without (SpaceX) in the name.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @spcxtg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,287,914 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Space Exploration Technologies Corp.” (@spcxtg), 86 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spcxtg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.