Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Оптика «ЗАЙДИ-УВИДИШЬ» СПб

Channel

Оптика «ЗАЙДИ-УВИДИШЬ» СПб

@spbzu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

659subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693201337
TypeChannel
Username@spbzu
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/spbzu

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6596716657 August 2026 — 667 subscribers8 August 2026 — 667 subscribers16 August 2026 — 670 subscribers24 August 2026 — 669 subscribers31 August 2026 — 671 subscribers9 September 2026 — 668 subscribers16 September 2026 — 665 subscribers29 September 2026 — 662 subscribers10 October 2026 — 659 subscribers7 August 202610 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 63 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 657–673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 02:42659-3
29 Sept 2026, 18:16662-3
16 Sept 2026, 10:15665-3
9 Sept 2026, 12:01668-3
31 Aug 2026, 06:12671+2
24 Aug 2026, 01:08669-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:12670+3
8 Aug 2026, 02:34667no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:38667first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥939.1%
❤730.4%
😁417.4%
🥰28.70%
👍14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC67 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На что обратить внимание на распродаже🤔 Помогаем вас с выбором в новом посте! Кстати, все модели доступны к покупке в салонах "ЗАЙДИ-УВИДИШЬ" и "ZEISS", а также на нашем сайте: https://zaidiuvidish.ru

3 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC126 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Знакомим вас с Ray-Ban еще ближе🕶️☀️ Это один из наиболее популярных брендов очков в мире, поэтому мы просто обязаны показать вам самые ходовые модели, которые наши посетители выбирают каждый день! Смотрит фото напрямую из магазина в новом посте👆🏻 Все модели доступны к покупке в салонах «ЗАЙДИ-УВИДИШЬ» и «ZEISS», а также на нашем сайте

❤1👍1🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC154 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не важно, где: в горах, на пляже, в городе и даже в автомобиле - очки нужны всегда! Почему? Объяснили в посте👆🏻 Подобрать идеальные очки под любую ситуацию можно во всех салонах ЗАЙДИ-УВИДИШЬ" и "ZEISS"

❤3🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC239 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✅Правильные ответы: 1) Миф Кепка - это отличный аксессуар, чтобы защитить вас от перегрева или солнечного удара, но глазам нужно дополнительная защита 2) Правда УФ-лучи, действительно, ускоряют старение, обезвоживают кожу и в следствие чего, появляются преждевременные морщины у глаз 3) Правда Линзы также имеют защиту от УФ-лучей. Поэтому вы можете выбирать то, что вам комфортнее 4) Миф И для очков, и для них …

🔥2🥰2😁1

24 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC144 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Если не защищать глаза от солнца, спустя несколько лет есть вероятность обнаружения рака век

  1. Правда65%
  2. Миф35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥2❤1

24 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC134 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Покупать аксессуары для очков можно по желанию, это не является обязательным атрибутом

  1. Правда53%
  2. Миф47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥3❤1

24 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC137 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Можно заменить очки на линзы, ведь у них одинаковая степень защиты от УФ-лучей

  1. Правда27%
  2. Миф73%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁3❤1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @spbzu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Если не защищать глаза от солнца, спустя несколько лет есть вероятность обнаружения рака век

  1. Правда65%
  2. Миф35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Покупать аксессуары для очков можно по желанию, это не является обязательным атрибутом

  1. Правда53%
  2. Миф47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Можно заменить очки на линзы, ведь у них одинаковая степень защиты от УФ-лучей

  1. Правда27%
  2. Миф73%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Оптика «ЗАЙДИ-УВИДИШЬ» СПб” (@spbzu), 659 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spbzu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.