Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𑀝𐌿АЮЗ 𐌺Ф / союз спасения confession 💂🏻‍♀️🌨️

@spauzz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002681659875
TypeChannel
Username@spauzz
Description💂🏻‍♀️🌨️ влд: @Taminawww
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 1 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/spauzz

Growth

557 August 2026 — 55 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 08:1655no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:1055first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
93
Videos
7
Links
69

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 09s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

98 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3636.7%
❤‍🔥1818.4%
🔥1717.3%
💯77.14%
💋66.12%
💘66.12%
🍓44.08%
🤩22.04%
👎11.02%
🤝11.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2025 to 6 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jun 2025, 04:42 UTC398 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сделала я короче Николая 1 союз спасения, в пт оцените, Похож или не похож? Неанон: имечко

9🍓3💯2

Signed мāрмĕладøва 🎲

30 May 2025, 08:38 UTC440 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Здравствуйте ОГО До свидания Неанон Мел

❤‍🔥73

Signed митя ⁴ ENTP 🎲

29 May 2025, 16:39 UTC380 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Из того поста про пони. Я буду делать Николая по этому рисуночку. Бл, какую кьютимарку ему лепить я хз. Неанон Британский ангел #тейк #спаюз

3🍓1

Signed митя ⁴ ENTP 🎲

29 May 2025, 12:36 UTC321 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Решила сделать себе перса из спаюза в виде пони из солёного теста. Каркас готов(правда без башки пока). Гадайте, кто это будет😏 #тейк #спаюз

🔥8❤‍🔥3🤩2💯1

Signed митя ⁴ ENTP 🎲

27 May 2025, 07:13 UTC252 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Рылеев-.. Мне так нравится как Антон Шагин его сыграл Скоро будет ещё 🤫🤫 @Aiko_212

🔥82🤝1

Signed خازغروموفيتش

22 May 2025, 06:42 UTC262 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

всем здравствуйте эдиты не мои неанон роник #тейк || @spauzz_bot

6

Signed رونالدو مبتلع القضيب

14 May 2025, 18:58 UTC259 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ваши хедканоны на то, как бы персонажи спаюза играли в бункер? На какие карты им бы везло? Кто бы постоянно не проходил? #тейк || @spauzz

💘2

Signed رونالدو مبتلع القضيب

14 May 2025, 17:10 UTC248 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Здравствуйте, напишите любые классные цитаты из спаюза и я может их использую как цитату в шк альбоме ну может переделаю. Помогите пожалуйста #тейк || @spauzz_bot

❤‍🔥5👎1💯1🔥1

Signed رونالدو مبتلع القضيب

13 May 2025, 04:27 UTC298 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

хихишные;) !неанон кино 🎬 #тейк || @spauzz_bot

💯2

Signed والدك

12 May 2025, 14:25 UTC235 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Мне было скучно, поэтому я сделал Мишу и Павла в пт (пони таун) #тейк || @spauzz_bot

💋5💯1

Signed Майский

5 May 2025, 13:16 UTC243 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Всем приветик У Вас есть стикеры с Романовой Александрой Федоровной из спаюза? Очень надо🙏 #тейк || @spauzz_bot

6💋1

Signed 𝐊𝐢𝐟𝐫𝐢

5 May 2025, 04:01 UTC293 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @chtenieconfPhoto

𝕎𝕖𝕝𝕔𖦹𝕞𝕖 𝕥𝕠 ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠчᴛᴇниᴇ ℂ𖦹ɴꜰᴇssɪᴏɴ 🍂 ╔༻ ━━━━━━━━━━━ ༺╗ Добро пожал𖦹вать В виртуальную комнату любителей чтения🤍 ╚༻ ━━━━━━━━━━━ ༺╝ –϶ᴛоᴛ ᴀʙᴛ𖦹ᴩ..ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ。。。 ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ 📖ᅠᅠ–ʍнᴇ ᴨонᴩᴀʙиᴧᴀᴄь ᴋниᴦᴀ!.. ᅠᅠᅠ –ᴨᴩиᴋиньᴛᴇ,ᴛуᴛ ʙ ᴋ𖦹нцᴇ..(⁠•⁠ ⁠▽⁠ ⁠•⁠;⁠) Вам сюда!ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ・゜゚・*☆ : ̗̀➛ ℕ𝕒𝕧𝕚𝕘𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 :: вп пост | хештеги | правила тейков | чат 𝄞 |доска почета,буст | @Chteniecf_bot –написать тейк | ec:📖🕯️ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ @chtenieconf ভভভভভভভভভভভভভভভভভভ

Signed ꧁༺Cyan ༻꧂ #ТрубелеевыКанон #МирёжиМоиОтцы

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @spauzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 763,875 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𑀝𐌿АЮЗ 𐌺Ф / союз спасения confession 💂🏻‍♀️🌨️” (@spauzz), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spauzz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.