Channel
@sparkof_technology
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
34subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002110079045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sparkof_technology |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 10 times, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sparkof_technology |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @techsparks/47946 Dec 2024, 16:44 UTC | @sparkof_technology/689 · this entry6 Dec 2024, 17:30 UTC | 1.00 | 46 minutes |
| @techsparks/47968 Dec 2024, 14:46 UTC | @sparkof_technology/691 · this entry8 Dec 2024, 15:45 UTC | 1.00 | 58 minutes |
| @techsparks/480413 Dec 2024, 11:45 UTC | @sparkof_technology/698 · this entry13 Dec 2024, 12:05 UTC | 1.00 | 20 minutes |
| @techsparks/484618 Jan 2025, 11:02 UTC | @sparkof_technology/716 · this entry18 Jan 2025, 11:06 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @techsparks/494017 Mar 2025, 19:43 UTC | @sparkof_technology/717 · this entry17 Mar 2025, 19:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @techsparks/494619 Mar 2025, 10:25 UTC | @sparkof_technology/723 · this entry19 Mar 2025, 10:25 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @techsparks | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 20 minutes | @techsparks (13–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 December 2024 to 19 October 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @techsparks. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 34 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 35 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 36 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2024 to 19 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Что-то мне подсказывает, что через 4-5 лет эти ребята от Boston Dynamics будут совсем не брейк-данс танцевать. 🔫 А пока, конечно, кроме восторга — никаких комментариев.
Продолжая тему роботизации. Маск уже давно говорит, что будущее Теслы и взлет ее капитализации зависят не столько от производства автомобилей, сколько от перехода к массовому выпуску роботов. Правда, пока речь идет о выпуске малой пробной партии к концу текущего года. Но вот и китайцы, лидеры в мировом производстве электромобилей, вторят Маску: “Regarding robotics, I think it is probably going to be the biggest futur…
Вчера в Сан-Хосе на GTC-2025 Nvidia много чего объявила, но я, как обычно, хочу написать не про карточки, а про более мне интересное — про роботов. Анонсирована Groot N1 — AI foundation model for humanoid robotics. Уже само название показывает преемственность с моделью Groot, которую ровно год назад анонсировали. В N1 сочетаются режимы, аналогичные канемановским системам 1 и 2 в мышлении человека: рассуждения системы…
Через неделю европейцы соберутся обсуждать свой цифровой суверенитет — EuroStack Initiative — потому что американские олигархи наезжают на европейские ценности (я не ерничаю, оно в оригинале дословно выглядит так - US administration and digital tech oligarchs openly push back on Europe’s regulatory autonomy and European values.). Все это было бы комично, когда бы не грусть, что от идеи если не глобальной деревни, то …
Ой, бензопилу не в тот канал отправил, картинки у меня в другом - :)) Но пусть уж и здесь висит. _______ Вернемся к технологиям: Американский стартап Tern предлагает альтернативу GPS под названием IDPS (Independently Derived Positioning System). Чем дальше, тем больше людей сталкиваются с ситуациями, когда сигналы GPS искусственно искажены — и это происходит не только в районах военных конфликтов. Самая многочисленн…
Интересно, как живется дереву рядом с таким монументом-напоминалкой? :) Италия, Доломитовые Альпы, сентябрь 2022
Adobe опубликовал интересные данные, демонстрирующие изменение структуры трафика на сайты электронной торговли. Доля источников, связанных с ИИ, растет экспоненциально — жаль, что сама эта доля в отчете не указана. Она, видимо, пока крошечная, но устойчивый рост в режиме «удвоение каждые два месяца» способен быстро дать заметные результаты, потому что пользовательские привычки уже начали меняться: 39% опрошенных поку…
И как раз в тему “когда AGI” только что высказался в Лондоне и Демис Хассабис, глава DeepMind: он назвал интервал 5-10 лет. Что вполне совпадает с тем, что говорил в предыдущем посте Лян Вэньфэн 🙂 По его словам, все зависит от успехов в создании не языковых моделей, а моделей мира, способных работать не только в цифровом мире, но и в материальном. Кажется, постепенно придется переучивать освоившую термин LLM публику,…
Очень крутое интервью основателя DeepSeek Ляна Вэньфэна, спасибо Хабру, что его нашли и перевели — потому что в мейнстримной англоязычной прессе фиг что подобное найдешь - там свои герои. Этому интервью скоро год, поэтому читать вдвойне интересно: Лян говорит задолго до того момента, как DeepSeek стал мировой сенсацией. Показательно, что как и Сэм Альтман, Лян говорит про AGI как главную цель работы: “наша цель — соз…
Довольно экзотическое применение экзоскелета. Я привык к двум сценариям: ⁃ Реабилитационный, когда экзоскелет помогает восстанавливать или компенсирует утраченную телесную функцию ⁃ Добавочно-силовой, когда экзоскелет является усилителем мышечных усилий здорового человека (устройства для грузчиков или хайкеров). Но оказалось, что у него может быть и обучающая функция. Пианист, повредивший кисти собственных рук неум…
👍1
Мустафа Сулейман за прошедший год стал моим любимым автором. Человек, по крутейшей траектории Deep Mind — Google — Inflection — Microsoft оказался в роли Microsoft AI CEO, где его колоссальный опыт и немалые амбиции стали сочетаться с нехилыми ресурсами. Его интервью и выступления вызывают ажиотаж, иногда кого-то раздражают, многих воодушевляют. И вот — очередное его интервью, хоть в аудио, хоть в текстовой расшифро…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sparkof_technology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Искра Технологий” (@sparkof_technology), 34 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sparkof_technology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.