Channel
@sparklingdate
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
462subscribers
+448 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004357209333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sparklingdate |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 16 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sparklingdate |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 462 | +15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:48 | 447 | +27 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 420 | +406 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 14 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 14 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 19 | 45.2% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.76% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
3 марта я написала подружке капсом: — Я ВЛЮБИИИЛАСЬ! Все началось с того, что я написала в Твинби 28-летнему парню просто потому, что у него была классная фотография. Без ожиданий. Ну максимум думала, что поставит лайк. Вместо этого мы заболтались. Оказалось, он работает сомелье в разных ресторанных проектах. И тут я вспомнила девушку, у которой однажды в метро подсмотрела конспекты. Это были буквально конспекты м…
😁2👍1
Video, posted without a caption
🤣3😁1
Параллельно со всей этой историей с Тиндером у меня на протяжении десяти лет были стабильные, лёгкие, ни к чему не обязывающие отношения. Последние три года я при этом жаловалась подружкам, что всё самое интересное в моей жизни уже было. Что искренне, по-детски счастливой я больше никогда не буду, ничем меня уже не удивить, а впереди только скучная однообразная жизнь. И секса мне тоже давно не хотелось. Вообще. Пол…
❤3👍2
Channel photo updated
Photo, posted without a caption
Он: ты не такая как другие девушки Я, у которой все девушки в окружении красивые, талантливые, смешные и умные
🔥4❤2
Недавно мне попалось описание профиля с вопросом: «Здесь вообще кто-нибудь гуляет?» Я сначала не поняла, это серьёзно или сарказм. Потом подумала: нет, в 2026-м правда больше никто не гуляет. Мне очень хватило 2019-го.
Photo, posted without a caption
👏2
Была одна встреча, от которой меня до сих пор передергивает. Встретились с парнем около метро «Октябрьская», у памятника Ленину. Пошли в соседний сквер, и там он начал притягивать меня к себе. Я его отталкивала. А он совершенно искренне спрашивал: — У нас же был мэтч в Тиндере. Почему ты не хочешь целоваться? Вот такое, оказывается, было у человека представление о встрече. Я сказала, что не могу так сразу. Мы поп…
😁2
Важное!
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3
Насвайпала рыжего парня с красивой фоткой рядом с машиной. Жил он в ЖК «Символ». Мы договорились встретиться в суши-баре неподалеку. В назначенное время он… не пришел. Ни через полчаса, ни через час. Потом очень извинялся и просил перенести встречу. Зачем-то я согласилась. В следующий раз встретились в Измайловском парке. И он практически сразу начал сокращать дистанцию: брал меня за руку, приобнимал. Потом сел н…
😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sparklingdate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игристые свидания” (@sparklingdate), 462 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sparklingdate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.