The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Channel
Spanische Grippe
@spanische_grippe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
425subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001414027856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spanische_grippe |
| Description | Infos zur Spanischen Grippe / Spanish flu |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 17 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spanische_grippe |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 425 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 425 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 17 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 14
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 30
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1h 06m
- Average length
- 33m 06s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🎥 Blockbuster: Die Wissenschaft ist eindeutig, es existiert kein krankmachendes Virus❗️ ❗️🎁 Weihnachtsspecial 🎁❗️ ✅ Ohne "nervige" Musik ✅ Alle Übersetzung sind jetzt lesbar ✅ Schriften überlagern nicht mehr ✅ Fehlende deutsche Übersetzungen hinzugefügt ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 💬 Corona_Fakten präsentiert eine Reihe von Aussagen diverser Forscher, Wissenschaftler, Ärzten, Anwälten & mehr, die nach intensiver Recherche und ei…
Zum Nachweis der Existenz von krankmachenden Viren Offensichtlich fehlt er! ➡️ https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/772 Video auch auf odysee.com
C o r o n a _ F a k t e n präsentiert eine Reihe von Aussagen diverser Forscher, Wissenschaftler, Ärzte, Anwälte & mehr, die nach intensiver Recherche und eigenen Kontrollexperimenten zu dem eindeutigen Ergebnis gekommen sind: ES GIBT KEINEN EINZIGEN NACHWEIS FÜR KRANKMACHENDE VIREN! Es geht vor allem darum, dafür zu sorgen, dass so etwas nie wieder geschehen kann! Und das schaffen wir nur, wenn wir aufhören uns au…
R a d i o M ü n c h e n Heilung Nebensache Die Irrungen der Medizin 29.11.2021 - 43 min Univ.-Doz. Dr. med. Gerd Reuther im Gespräch mit Radio München. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBPK1SaKowk Über die Irrungen der Medizin aus Medizinhistorischer Sicht, über Heilversprechen in religiöser und medizinischer Konkurrenz, über die Herren Robert Koch und Paul Ehrlich und über die Wirkprinzipien und Effekte von neuar…
CORONA-Ausschuss Sitzung 82 vom 10.12.2021 Befragter: Hans Tolzin zur Spanischen Grippe Ein 48-minütiger Ausschnitt der über 5-stündigen 82. Sitzung des Corona-Ausschusses. Sehenswert! Die komplette Sitzung kann hier gesehen werden: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jp3ek3frHo6v/ Obiger Ausschnitt bei 1:31:36
Viele Kritikpunkte an „Corona“ und den „Massnahmen“ erinnern sehr stark an die damalige AIDS-Hysterie. („Virus nicht isoliert“ - der „Virus-Nachweis fehlt“ - „PCR-Methode kann keine Infektion nachweisen“ - das Thema „falsch Positive“ - „gekaufte Wissenschaft“ - „verlogene Wissenschaft“ - Medikamente, die nur schädlich sind, aber nichts nützen u.s.w.u.s.f.) Wer möchte, kann sich auch im Kanal „HIV und AIDS“ umsehen…
Die CDC als Wiederholungstäter Die verschiedenen Versionen der Definition von „Impfung“ durch die CDC Das CDC ist das US-Pendant zum deutschen Robert Koch-Institut. 10. Juli 2012 http://web.archive.org/web/20120710132002/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm 14. Februar 2015 http://web.archive.org/web/20150214043055/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm 26. August 2021 http://web.arch…
Aufmerksam gemacht durch Thomas Massie (Mitglied des "United States House of Representatives")
Es gibt auch Studien darüber, daß ab 1918 in großem Stile auch gegen Grippe geimpft wurde. Hier z. B. eine, erschienen im Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Volume 64, Issue 4, October 2009. https://academic.oup.com/jhmas/article-abstract/64/4/401/667876 »Bakterielle Impfstoffe verschiedener Art wurden während der großen Grippepandemie von 1918-19 in großem Umfang sowohl zu präventiven als auc…
impf-report 12/13 (2005) Seiten 9-11 Das Ausmaß der Impfungen in den USA im Jahr 1918 Daß 1918 neben den ganzen anderen Impfungen sogar gegen Influenza geimpft wurde, belegt die New York Times vom 18.10.1918: nytimes.com/1918/10/18/archives/vaccine-cuts-army-influenza-deaths-major-roberts-of-base-hospital.html
„Es geht nicht darum, die Menschen zu heilen.“ Interview mit Elisabeth Linder, ehemalige Pharmareferentin (Dauer: 32 min) https://vimeo.com/582624672 Hört Euch an, was diese ehemalige Pharmareferentin zu sagen hat! Elisabeth Linder hat 28 Jahre für einen der größten Pharmakonzerne gearbeitet. Müsste sie es nicht wissen? Warum hat sie dennoch so lange in dieser Branche gearbeitet? Wann fing sie an, ihre Tätigkeit…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @spanische_grippe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@spanische_grippe named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spanische Grippe” (@spanische_grippe), 425 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spanische_grippe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.