Channel
@spamer228mexxadis
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
292subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001723737057 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spamer228mexxadis |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spamer228mexxadis |
Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 292 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 293 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 295 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 297 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 299 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 299 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,629 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 414 | 25.4% | |
| custom 5375228558232793909 | 327 | 20.1% | |
| 💋 | 262 | 16.1% | |
| 💔 | 245 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5301139599282680564 | 202 | 12.4% | |
| 🍓 | 176 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5895289646841074079 | 3 | 0.184% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,629 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2025 to 25 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
но если вам вдруг интересно просто почитать мой щитпост то мой неугомонный сайд цветет и пахнет предупреждение там ОЧЕНЬ много ф1 https://t.me/+o6DU2txyHQZhYjNi
❤23custom 53752285582327939095💔4🍓2💋2
Channel name was changed to «RIP сливы эйтиз онлайн бнз смс и регистрации бнз»
скорее всего сегодня хорошая возможность нормально с вами попрощаться и поблагодарить за все то время что мы провели вместе!! к сожалению мои интересы немного сместились и наличие большого количества работы так же сказывается так что к сожалению вести целый канал по эйтиз для меня уже не является возможным, но это было славное время я до сих пор очень люблю мальчиков но пора закрыть эту главу, всем спасибо за внимани…
💔79custom 537522855823279390925💋21❤8🍓4
нет это ощущается нереально что эйтиз и ф1 так близко
custom 537522855823279390938❤6💔5💋3🍓2
BREAKING MY SILENCE
🍓30💋17❤5custom 53752285582327939093
а помнеш.....
🍓49💋25💔17❤10custom 53752285582327939093
choi san.....
❤65💋26custom 530113959928268056421custom 537522855823279390913🍓4💔1
реже меня на этом канале появляется только традиш 😃
custom 530113959928268056461🍓27💋27custom 537522855823279390916❤6💔2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤29💋10custom 53011395992826805649💔4custom 53752285582327939093🍓1
прошу завидовать
💔52❤25custom 537522855823279390920🍓12💋6custom 53011395992826805643
show me who you are #xxadis #mingi
❤116custom 537522855823279390969custom 530113959928268056448💋17🍓2💔2
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 530113959928268056439custom 537522855823279390918❤14💋12🍓5💔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @spamer228mexxadis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RIP сливы эйтиз онлайн бнз смс и регистрации бнз” (@spamer228mexxadis), 292 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spamer228mexxadis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.