Channel
@spacephotodump
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
529subscribers
+72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004356820829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spacephotodump |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spacephotodump |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 529 | -11 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 540 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 551 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 561 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 564 | +106 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 458 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 457 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
835 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5967307267618377472 | 192 | 23.0% | |
| custom 5368749166275101441 | 189 | 22.6% | |
| custom 6012627857015050870 | 175 | 21.0% | |
| custom 6032875887626556562 | 137 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5325562806257329485 | 71 | 8.50% | |
| custom 5906712404422561096 | 71 | 8.50% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 835 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Absolute perfection
custom 536874916627510144133custom 596730726761837747224custom 601262785701505087010custom 53255628062573294854custom 60328758876265565623custom 59067124044225610961
Just recorded :)
custom 536874916627510144112custom 59673072676183774726custom 60126278570150508703custom 53255628062573294852
Video, posted without a caption
custom 532556280625732948514custom 53687491662751014414custom 59673072676183774723custom 60328758876265565623custom 60126278570150508701
I hardly ever point my telescope at the stars because they are simply too faraway! But I tried it today and the results were amazing)
custom 596730726761837747252custom 601262785701505087027custom 536874916627510144114custom 603287588762655656212custom 53255628062573294851custom 59067124044225610961
Video, posted without a caption
custom 536874916627510144114custom 60126278570150508708custom 60328758876265565625custom 53255628062573294853custom 59067124044225610962custom 59673072676183774721
Video, posted without a caption
custom 601262785701505087011custom 60328758876265565629custom 59673072676183774726custom 53687491662751014415custom 53255628062573294852custom 59067124044225610962
Now some videos
custom 590671240442256109616custom 601262785701505087013custom 53255628062573294854custom 53687491662751014414custom 59673072676183774721custom 60328758876265565621
Even closer Picture 4
custom 603287588762655656235custom 536874916627510144111custom 60126278570150508707custom 59673072676183774726custom 59067124044225610963custom 53255628062573294851
Picture 3
custom 536874916627510144120custom 601262785701505087012custom 59067124044225610965custom 59673072676183774725custom 53255628062573294853custom 60328758876265565622
Picture 2
custom 536874916627510144135custom 532556280625732948511custom 60126278570150508705custom 59673072676183774723custom 59067124044225610962
Took some pictures of the moon. They get increasingly up close Picture 1
custom 603287588762655656225custom 596730726761837747218custom 536874916627510144113custom 60126278570150508707custom 59067124044225610966custom 53255628062573294851
And this one my friends shows what we are missing due to light pollution 🥲 Increase your brightness 🔆
custom 596730726761837747232custom 603287588762655656222custom 53255628062573294858custom 60126278570150508706custom 59067124044225610962
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @spacephotodump. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SpacePhotoDump” (@spacephotodump), 529 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spacephotodump.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.