"Why should we reject ‘medical assistance in dying’? Because we reject a culture of death, because we reject the view of mankind as an animal." https://spacecommune.substack.com/p/there-is-no-dignity-in-treating-mankind
🙏2👍1

Channel
@spacecommune
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
30subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001990007034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spacecommune |
| Created | Between 1 June 2023 and 31 December 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spacecommune |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 30 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 31 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 58.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2024 to 19 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Why should we reject ‘medical assistance in dying’? Because we reject a culture of death, because we reject the view of mankind as an animal." https://spacecommune.substack.com/p/there-is-no-dignity-in-treating-mankind
🙏2👍1
https://spacecommune.substack.com/p/the-tragedy-of-samuel-morse?utm_source=activity_item
👍1
🔥 New Documentary Drop 🔥 Energy/Empire: Part 3 – America’s Green Counter-Revolution This chapter takes us deep into the Hudson Valley: ⚡️ RFK Jr.’s push to shut down nuclear projects at home and abroad 🏞 The blocked Storm King hydro project that RFK Sr. supported 📖 Silent Spring, population control & the eugenics connection to environmentalism 💸 How fear-based lawfare traded development for higher costs & poverty …
👀2
Did you know that Mao requested an in-person meeting with FDR in 1945 to discuss the post-war industrialization of China? To Britain's great relief, the request was blocked by an ambassador. In the 1970s, it was Kissinger, not Roosevelt, who got to be the first development partner of China. My latest article asks what could've been accomplished in that meeting: https://spacecommune.substack.com/p/the-secret-meeting-…
🚨BREAKING: Reports say Trump’s team floated a $30B civilian nuclear deal with Iran. It could be a bold revival of Eisenhower’s Atoms for Peace in 70 years. In 1953, Iran’s Mossadegh moved to nationalize British oil. The British responded with a coup, using the CIA and the Dulles brothers to hijack U.S. foreign policy in defense of empire. It betrayed FDR’s 1944 promise that Iran would modernize as a sovereign natio…
☢️⚡️ The Green Mirage Shattered: How the Collapse of Xlinks Exposes British Eco-Imperialism The Door Is Open to a True Development Partnership with Russia and China 🚄🌍 “The sun never sets on the British Empire” they once bragged. Now it sets each night on an island that can’t even power itself without leeching green energy from Africa. When the UK officially pulled the plug on the Xlinks Morocco–UK power cable, it…
👍1
🇰🇿🇷🇺🇨🇳⚛️ When Nations Build, Empires Tremble Kazakhstan exports 43% of the world's uranium from its mines. It's the second-largest fuel source for the United States' 100 operating nuclear reactors. Yet the average person in Kazakhstan lives in energy poverty, with no nuclear plants and only 1/3 of the access to electricity that the average American has. Thanks to help from Russia and China's nationalized nuclear c…
👍1
NEW ARTICLE: https://spacecommune.substack.com/p/water-vs-monetarism-hamilton-and
👍3
Fox went on Geopolitics and Empire to talk about bioregionalism: https://geopoliticsandempire.substack.com/p/fox-green-bioregionalism-dismantling
New Essay: https://spacecommune.substack.com/p/breaking-america-how-bioregionalism
This new article by Korybko echoes much of the work we've done in the last two years: https://korybko.substack.com/p/bangladeshs-graft-probe-into-its
NEW ARTICLE: https://americanthesis.substack.com/p/thomas-coles-warning-to-the-american
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @spacecommune. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Space Commune” (@spacecommune), 30 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spacecommune.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.