Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Создай Ⓚ

Channel

Создай Ⓚ

@sozdayk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

849subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001542781300
TypeChannel
Username@sozdayk
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sozdayk

Growth

848849848.513 Sept 2026, 00:22 — 848 subscribers14 Sept 2026, 09:54 — 849 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 00:2214 Sept 2026, 09:54
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 848–849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 09:54849+1
13 Sept 2026, 00:22848first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 849 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.7
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held15 (9 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total614
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

152 reactions across 15 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
152100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC65 views10 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

В интерьере смотрится. создай к.

10

3 Sept 2026, 16:20 UTC66 views10 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Вторая часть диптиха Без комментариев, это абсолютная графика HEAVY AF INDUSTRIES LTD.

10

3 Sept 2026, 16:19 UTC58 views9 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Сделал такую работу несколько месяцев назад и совсем забыл показать Прекрасное отражение словосочетания в знаке, из которого получился диптих Да неоднозначно Да охуенно

9

27 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Уютно когда немного холодно и есть чем укутаться

4

26 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC111 views13 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Что я ещё нарисовал Назвал "вспомогательные структуры", вот только чем они помогают вопрос открытый Возможно, из-за разрастающихся во все стороны технических элементов, от картинки веет вайбом манги блэйм. По крайней мере, мне так кажется

13

25 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC97 views5 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Не перестаю думать об этой стрелочке

5

24 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC117 views13 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Какова красота Никита решил поставить мои цветы на подоконник, а у меня даже и мысли не было, что эти букеты могут стать настоящими Не перестаёт удивлять, что в нашем мире чему угодно можно придать жизнь с помощью всего парочки строк текста

13

18 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC140 views5 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Немой взгляд послушных предметов

5

17 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC152 views15 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

И ещё капелька цветного

15

16 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC138 views4 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Воскресная потребительская прогулка

4

14 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC155 views7 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Прохожий на других похожих

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sozdayk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Щёлочь®
@sholotch · 26,203
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Создай Ⓚ” (@sozdayk), 849 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sozdayk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.