4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 376–391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 06:44
378
-5
16 Aug 2026, 20:34
383
-6
8 Aug 2026, 06:02
389
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:30
389
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.6%
avg views ÷ 378 subscribers
Avg views / post
120
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (8 March 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
239
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
303 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
248
81.8%
❤
39
12.9%
🔥
8
2.64%
😢
4
1.32%
👌
1
0.33%
👎
1
0.33%
😁
1
0.33%
🫡
1
0.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 303reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sovetskiefoto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Тетрадь в косую линейку: как в советской школе учили писать по‑настоящему красиво»
Советская тетрадь для прописей — это не просто бумага в обложке, а целый ритуал взросления: аккуратные косые линии, строгий наклон букв, чернильные кляксы и бесконечное выведение крючочков и палочек.
В младших классах за почерк ставили отдельную оценку — и она значила не меньше, чем знания.
Считалось, что ровный почерк воспитывает д…
«Соковыжималка по‑советски: техника, которая выжимала максимум»
В советском быту соковыжималка была не просто кухонным прибором — а почти участником семейных ритуалов.
Осенью вместе с заготовками на зиму обязательно крутили яблоки, морковь, томаты: свежий сок считался полезным, а банки с домашним напитком — настоящим запасом здоровья.
Советские модели делали массивными и надёжными: металл, минимум пластика, упор на…
Советский стол-книга: мебель-легенда
Помните этот компактный и невероятно функциональный предмет мебели?
Именно за ним многие отмечали Новый год, встречали гостей и резали оливье.
Механизм раскладывания — «бабочка»: поднял половинки, развернул ножки — и готово.
В собранном виде занимал всего 30–35 см ширины.
Интересный факт💡:
Этот предмет мебели был настоящим спасением для малогабаритных квартир, включая знамениты…
Легендарный бальзам "Звёздочка" – помните этот аромат?
Наверняка у каждого есть свои воспоминания, связанные с этим советским чудом!
"Звёздочка" была настоящим спасением от головной боли, насморка и даже укусов комаров.
Её освежающий и покалывающий эффект мгновенно приносил облегчение.
Интересный факт💡: Знаете ли вы, что вьетнамский бальзам "Золотая Звезда" (его полное название) стал популярен в СССР в 80-х годах? …
Советская детская коляска: символ эпохи и заботы!
Эта классика советского детства вызывала у многих теплые воспоминания. Массивные, надежные, с большими колесами – они были настоящими вездеходами!
Их дизайн был простым, но функциональным.
Несмотря на скромный вид, эти коляски служили верой и правдой многим поколениям.
Интересный факт💡: Знаете ли вы, что дизайн многих советских колясок был вдохновлен западными моде…
Открывашки "Ну, погоди!" из СССР!
Помните эти яркие, запоминающиеся открывашки с Волком и Зайцем?
Они были настоящими хитами! Каждый хотел собрать всю коллекцию.
Интересный факт💡: Изначально Волк в мультфильме говорил более грубым голосом, но создатели решили сделать его более "обаятельным" хулиганом, что и привело к такой популярности персонажей!
Эти открывашки были не просто предметом для открывания напитков.
Это…
Томатный сок в СССР – это вкус детства!
Помните стеклянные банки и соленый привкус?
Этот напиток был невероятно популярен.
Его пили в столовых, буфетах и даже дома.
Считалось, что он очень полезен.
Интересный факт💡: томатный сок часто использовали как… опохмелин! Говорили, что он отлично восстанавливает силы.
А вы любили томатный сок в советское время?👍
✅ Мы в MAX
Советские Сандалии "Скороход": Легенда, которую помним!
Помните эти лёгкие, удобные и такие родные сандалии?
"Скороход" — это не просто обувь, это целая эпоха!
Они были символом доступности и качества.
Каждый ребёнок в СССР мечтал о паре новеньких "Скороходов" на лето.
Интересный факт💡: Знаете ли вы, что фабрика "Скороход" была одной из старейших обувных фабрик в России, основанной ещё в 1882 году? Вот это истори…
👍16👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sovetskiefoto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рожден в СССР - Советские фото, видео и факты” (@sovetskiefoto), 378 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sovetskiefoto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.