Channel
@soutienAnnaN
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
482subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003371005930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soutienAnnaN |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soutienAnnaN |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 482 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 482 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 April 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 14,405 |
| Reactions total | 267 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1,346 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 613 | 45.5% | |
| ❤ | 492 | 36.6% | |
| 🕊 | 83 | 6.17% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 3.71% | |
| 😢 | 43 | 3.19% | |
| 🤬 | 27 | 2.01% | |
| 🤝 | 24 | 1.78% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.297% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 0.149% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.149% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.074% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,346reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Quelques nouvelles d’Anna 🔹La visite de ses enfants ces derniers jours a fait beaucoup de bien à tout le monde. Ces moments ensemble, même trop courts et trop espacés compte tenu de la distance et de toute la logistique que ça implique apportent un réconfort vital aux enfants. 🔹Anna semble garder le moral malgré le nouveau refus de ses demandes de liberté conditionnelle. Elle compte bien renouveler ses demandes. So…
❤41🙏35😢10🕊4😡1
Une nouvelle fois, la demande de liberté conditionnelle d’Anna a été rejetée ces derniers jours. D’autres auditions devant le juge d’instruction seraient en fait prévues dans les prochaines semaines ou mois. Comme toujours, nous ne ferons aucun commentaire sur les aspects judiciaires de la procédure. Malgré ces nouvelles, Anna semble garder le moral. Elle recevra, dans les prochains jours, la visite de ses enfants,…
🙏51🕊13❤9🤬5😢4
Quelques nouvelles d’Anna ▪️Anna a été entendue une nouvelle fois par le juge la semaine dernière. Selon son avocat, il s’agirait de sa dernière audition dans le cadre de l’enquête. ▪️Sa dernière demande de remise en liberté a malheureusement été rejetée. Une nouvelle demande devrait toutefois être déposée prochainement dans le sens d’une solution alternative à la détention. ▪️Malgré cette décision, Anna semble ga…
🙏62❤32
Point d’information rapide 🔹Une nouvelle demande de mise en liberté a été déposée par sa défense. Les enfants gardent toujours bon espoir qu’une solution alternative à la détention soit adoptée. 🔹Une nouvelle audition est prévue par ailleurs ce mois-ci ⚖️. 🔹En marge de cela, face aux allégations et aux fantasmes relayés dans la presse au sujet de sa personnalité et de sa vie privée, Anna envisage, a minima, avec so…
❤47🙏18👍11🕊6
🇫🇷Quelques nouvelles d’Anna 🔹L’Appel concernant sa demande de liberté conditionnelle a été rejeté le 24 juin. 🔹Une nouvelle audition devant le juge concernant l’affaire devrait avoir lieu au mois de juillet selon son avocat. 🔹Le moral d’Anna reste relativement bon, concernant les demandes de solutions alternatives à la détention, elle souhaiterait déposer une autre demande rapidement. 🔹Sa maman est donc venue en …
❤53🕊20🙏6👍2🫡1😁1
🇫🇷 Par ailleurs, le séjour de la mère d’Anna en France se déroule bien. Elle a pu la visiter en prison, rendre visite à ses petits enfants dans le sud. Elle sera présente à l’audience ce mercredi. Elle tient à remercier profondément tous ceux qui ont pu aider et rendre ce séjour possible. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 ——————————————— 🇷🇺🇷🇺 Кроме того, пребывание мамы Анны во Франции проходит хорошо. Она смогла навестить Анну в тюрьме, а та…
❤67🕊3👏1
🇫🇷 ⚖️ Ce mercredi 24 Juin à 14h se tiendra donc au Tribunal de Paris une nouvelle audience concernant l’appel de la demande de mise en liberté d’Anna pendant la durée de l’instruction. Cette audience est publique. À celles et ceux qui seront présents, merci de faire preuve de calme, de dignité, et de respect pour la justice comme pour la présomption d’innocence. Nous gardons l’espoir qu’une solution alternative à…
🙏41❤10🕊2
📣L' audience devrait se tenir de nouveau ce mercredi 24 Juin. (problème de procédure lors de l’audience du 3 juin.) À suivre...
🙏22✍1
🇫🇷Par ailleurs, la mère d’Anna devrait arriver prochainement en France depuis la Sibérie. Elle pourra rendre visite à Anna à Fleury ainsi qu’à ses petits-enfants dans le sud. 😊Une visite attendue et qui fera du bien, mais pas simple : les voyages depuis la Russie restent toujours compliqués, dans un contexte qui demeure délicat. On espère que tout se passera bien. Merci à celles et ceux qui contribuent à la cagnott…
❤47🙏12🤬1
🇫🇷 Point rapide concernant l’audience en appel de mercredi dernier pour la demande de remise en liberté d’Anna. Un problème de procédure serait survenu et son avocat n’a pas pu plaider comme prévu. Aucune décision n’a été prise à ce stade. Cela arrive. ➡️ À suivre. ——————————————————————- 🇷🇺 Короткое сообщение о заседании в апелляционном суде в прошлую среду по вопросу об освобождении Анны. По имеющейся информац…
🙏34❤8👍1🤬1
🇫🇷 ⚖️ Aujourd’hui, mercredi 03 Juin à 14h se tiendra au Tribunal de Paris l’audience concernant l’appel de la demande de mise en liberté d’Anna pendant la durée de l’instruction. Cette audience est publique. À celles et ceux qui seront présents, merci de faire preuve de calme, de dignité, et de respect pour la justice comme pour la présomption d’innocence. Nous gardons l’espoir qu’une solution alternative à la dét…
🙏69❤12💩1
Photo, posted without a caption
🙏43❤19🕊15😢6🖕1🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @soutienAnnaN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 306,118 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anna- Nouvelles & Soutien” (@soutienAnnaN), 482 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soutienAnnaN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.