⛑️ СОТ в ПП (специалист по охране труда в первой помощи)
Доказываю: первая помощь ≠ истерика. Первая помощь = алгоритм.
🔹 Польза от СОТа
🔹 Заметки преподавателя
🔹 Щепотка профессионального юмора🤌
Created
Between 1 February 2026 and 30 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 22:17
36
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:39
36
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
86.1%
avg views ÷ 36 subscribers
Avg views / post
31.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
54.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held
10 (30 April 2026 – 17 July 2026)
Views total
31
Reactions total
17
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
24
Videos
2
Links
3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
115 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
48
41.7%
👍
31
27.0%
❤
15
13.0%
🎉
5
4.35%
✍
4
3.48%
🤝
4
3.48%
🫡
4
3.48%
👏
3
2.61%
💅
1
0.87%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Три дня в лагере: что я поняла про подростков и первую помощь
На прошлой неделе я три дня провела в детском лагере. Обучала первой помощи взрослых детей 14–17 лет. График был плотный — 4–6 занятий в день. Мы разбирали универсальный алгоритм, отрабатывали навыки, разрушали мифы... много мифов. Убедились в том, что первая помощь — это просто, это законно, и что первая помощь спасает жизни.
Это было общение с теми, кт…
Если, живя в современное время, вы задумывались об обучении оказанию первой помощи пострадавшим, возможно, перед вами вставал вопрос:
«А какие же курсы всё-таки выбрать? Оказание первой помощи или курсы по тактической медицине?»
Как всегда, начнем разбираться в вопросе с нормативной базы.
Первая помощь регулируется Приказом Минздрава России от 03.05.2024 № 220н «Об утверждении Порядка оказания первой помощи», кото…
Не любой набор медицинских изделий можно назвать аптечкой для оказания первой помощи 🤷
Исходя из перечня приказов выше, становится понятно: собирать аптечку необходимо в соответствии с требованиями Минздрава. Наша задача — взять нужный нам приказ из списка и использовать его как готовый чек-лист✅
Важно: Использовать подручные средства при оказании первой помощи не запрещено. Но согласитесь, применять специальные из…
✅ Все аптечки в одном посте! 🫢
Информация настолько же полезная, насколько и скучная.
Если вы так же, как и я, периодически ищете этот перечень или задаётесь вопросом: подходит ли нам обычная аптечка для оказания первой помощи работниками, или есть более «специальная»?
Тогда этот перечень для вас 👇
1. Приказ Минздрава России от 14.04.2025 № 209н — Об утверждении требований к комплектации укладки для оказания перво…
Старые плакаты — как показатель того, что пора что-то менять...
Захожу с обучением на предприятие. Что я, как СОТ-преподаватель, увижу первым делом?
Правильно. Устаревшие плакаты в уголке по охране труда.
Почему это важно?
Итак, Трудовой кодекс (ст. 214, ст. 216.3, ст. 228) говорит: работодатель обязан организовать оказание первой помощи пострадавшему.
Как организовать:
1️⃣ Сделать так, чтобы сотрудники знали, КАК…
Друзья, нужна ваша помощь ✈️
Пройдите, пожалуйста, короткую анкету об оказании первой помощи на борту самолёта. Это займёт около 7 минут и поможет улучшить систему первой помощи и безопасность перелётов.Спасибо за участие.
https://clck.ru/3TQvFQ
Первая помощь — играючи!
Мой коллега, Иван Ловушкин (@YanKelt), создал великолепную (я считаю 😍) игру по оказанию первой помощи: «Маски, пластырь, два жгута». Она учит выстраивать последовательность действий в голове и позволяет отработать практические навыки.
Игра замечательная. Играть в неё лучше, если вы уже прошли обучение и знаете универсальный алгоритм — так вы закрепите его на отлично.
Всем желающим предлаг…
Хотите организовать первую помощь в организации? Тогда вам нужен грамотный СОТ. Вот почему.
Потому что СОТ смотрит на первую помощь через юридические аспекты.
Например, он подскажет вам:
▸ как правильно разместить аптечку, изучив «Правила размещения и хранения»;
▸ каким должен быть знак места размещения аптечки по ГОСТу;
▸ и всегда продумывает, как вы будете действовать при проверке инспектором труда.
Реальная ис…
Считаю, для специалиста по охране труда посещение конференций — неотъемлемая часть жизни.
Особенно по первой помощи 😍🤭
Делюсь недавней поездкой в Краснодар. 24–25 апреля.
❤7👏1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @sotvpp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,204,518 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СОТ в ПП” (@sotvpp), 36 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sotvpp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.