Channel
@sotka_v_karmane
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
313subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002475344768 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sotka_v_karmane |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sotka_v_karmane |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 313 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 312 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 312 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (3 January 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 86 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
121 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 48 | 39.7% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 27.3% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 16.5% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 5.79% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 5.79% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sotka_v_karmane. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 January 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Добрый вечер, коллеги, любители и просто интересующиеся земельной темой. В личку поступают вопросы о том, все ли у меня хорошо. Низкая активность и отсутствие постов на канале в сложившейся ситуации указывают на большой объем работы, которую я совмещаю с руководящей должностью в одной из организаций г. СПб. Коллеги отмечают мой канал в своих постах, а значит работа идёт. Личка открыта для общения в формате вопрос-от…
❤5👍1
16 мая планирую присутствовать на этом замечательном мероприятии, увлекательные беседы, сильные спикеры и море позитива. Буду рад очно у знакомству и обмену опытом😉
🔥5❤1
Коллеги, приглашаем всех на встречу! 🎉 Друзья, если вы ждали — сейчас самое время занять свое место на встрече земельных специалистов 📍 16 мая | 10:30–17:00 📍 Лофт COM.NATA на Петроградской (Газовая, 10Ж) Это будет живая встреча про реальные возможности работы с землёй — как всегда без воды, с практикой, кейсами и сильным окружением. Темы, которые разберём: 🔥 Земля для бизнеса: от проверки участка до запуска прое…
Ну и конечно участок. Без физического труда ум отдыхать не сможет. За весну был расчищен от зарослей и деревьев (остались избранные) участок в Приозерском районе ЛО, приобретённых мной для себя с целью строительства дома (1 дом хорошо, а 2 лучше). На летнем фото видна плотность зарослей, а весенняя фотография отражает вид после обработки
👍8
Кому интересно, вопросы по тезисам всегда приветствуются
1. После отказа в удовлетворении требований администрации к моему дорогому партнёру @FominaNastyaS, администрация подала апелляционную жалобу (дело 2-236/2026 Горячеключевской городской суд Крд). Уверен, решение устоит в апелляции, а мы со своей стороны сделаем все возможное для этого. 2. Суд в Крыму. Как ни странно - обжалование отказа в постановке на ГКУ ранее согласованного земельного участка. Тут я решил восполь…
🔥6👍2
Ну и конечно, приветствую подписчиков моей скромности, адептов медийной тишины и внешнего спокойствия😁 Канал не погиб, а его автор расставил приоритеты иначе: Сперва дело, а опосля и словцо красное об оном молвить дозволено. За два неполных месяца тишины на канале произошло многое, но расскажу частично, тезисно и по порядку. Напомню, что в приоритете было восстановление после операции и мой участок, где я, собстве…
👍3
Дорогие мои, хотел бы в этот день поздравить Вас с Днём Великой Победы нашего народа над мировой угрозой, нависшей над всей планетой в 1933 году, разросшейся и окрепшей за короткое время подобно раковой опухоли. С 2011 года в составе одного из поисковых отрядов помогаю восстановить память павших предков на той войне ибо не будет предан забвенью подвиг наших предков пока жива память в наших сердцах. С Праздником, с Дн…
🔥5❤1
Хорошие новости! Завершилось длительное рассмотрение дела 2-236/2026 (2-2188/2025) в суде 1й инстанции по иску администрации к старому и новому арендаторам земельного участка с незавершенкой на нем. Отдельную благодарность хочу выразить @evmin_nikolai за личное присутствие на заседаниях и проделанную работу. Личное присутствие в суде имеет огромное значение, когда на стороне оппонента имеется преимущество ввиде адм…
🔥13❤1
Разумеется, интересы огородника и честного землепользователя защищает Ваш покорный слуга. Не только сухой структурированный юридический язык важен в суде, но и простые человеческие слова, ибо правосудие вершат такие же люди со своим пониманием что такое "хорошо" , а что такое "плохо". Уверен, если бы получилось показать суду весь тернистый путь господина Я. к его вожделенному огороду, решение было бы иным. А сейчас п…
👍5
История длится почти 2 года, срок немаленький. Потому хочется сказать, что работа с землей - это не "подал заявление, выкупил зу за 3% и переподал с наваром 300%" Это терпение и упорство. Любовь к земле и необходимость её использования и сохранения характеристик участка. Основные моменты, отмеченные судом: 1. Короткий срок между заключением аренды и заявлением на выкуп. ("предпреимчивый молодой человек") 2. Регистр…
😁4
Сегодня в Третьем кассационной суде общей юрисдикции коллегия рассмотрела кассационную жалобу гражданина Я. на апелляционное опрелеление Ленинградского областного суда. Предыстория: в 2024 году Я., желая стать огородником в Гатчинском районе ЛО, подаёт заявление в администрацию района и получает отказ. Желание быть ближе к земле настолько сильное, что Я. идёт в суд и по итогам разбирательства администрация согласует …
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sotka_v_karmane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 494,728 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сотка в кармане. Земля и инвестиции🎄” (@sotka_v_karmane), 313 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sotka_v_karmane.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.