Channel created

Channel
Сота-резерв
@sotavision
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
228subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001524048118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sotavision |
| Description | мы переехали |
| Created | 23 May 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sotavision |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 228 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 228 | +2 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 226 | first reading |
Engagement
1 post held, back to 23 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 1 post for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Showing the 1 most recent of 1 post we hold for @sotavision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 602,812 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@kolezev · 59,85721 postsReadovka
@readovkanews · 2,011,9666 posts❗️Mordor Post❗️
@go_help · 2562 postsLive And Let Live
@buddypositive · 81 post#неДепутат
@nedepytat2020 · 511 postАдминресурс
@noadminsource · 1041 postАкции в поддержку политзаключенных и преследуемых по политическим мотивам
@politactions · 261 postPro et Contra
@proetcontra · 301 postСпасём Алексея Дмитриева!
@savealexdmitriev · 1691 post6 марта 15:00, Москва
@stopwarmsk · 3831 post"Экстремисты": за что сажают в России
@zapretno_info · 5941 postХабаровск - РФ | За Фургала - За право выбора | ЯГражданин!
@zavibor_2020 · 1381 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…beispielsweise mit Plakaten „ich habe keine Angst“ oder anderen.[https://t.me/sotavision/38838?singleSOTA t.me], 16. April 2022. Der Protest in…”
read 9 August 2026
“…удалили канал «Вечер с Владимиром Соловьёвым»{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/sotavision/36806 |title=SOTA |access-date=2022-03-08 |archive-date=2022-03-08…”
read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сота-резерв” (@sotavision), 228 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sotavision.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.