сорокина стихи pinned «Короче тут такие дела: с первого числа я работаю в «Новом мире»! Поэтому я завел канал, где буду писать свои размышления и отклики на заинтересовавшие меня тексты из журнала. Своего рода дайджест самого, по моему мнению, интересного. Приходите! Там уже есть…»

Channel
сорокина стихи
@sorokinastichi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
119subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002044990549 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sorokinastichi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sorokinastichi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 119 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 119 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 56.3%
- avg views ÷ 119 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 67.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- 29.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 December 2025 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 67 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 21
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
174 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86 | 49.4% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 10.3% | |
| ⚡ | 15 | 8.62% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 8.05% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 6.90% | |
| 🎄 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 2.87% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 2.87% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.72% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Короче тут такие дела: с первого числа я работаю в «Новом мире»! Поэтому я завел канал, где буду писать свои размышления и отклики на заинтересовавшие меня тексты из журнала. Своего рода дайджест самого, по моему мнению, интересного. Приходите! Там уже есть первый пост https://t.me/ivansorokinchitaetnoviymir https://vk.ru/ivansorokinchitaetnoviymir
🔥11❤7👍2
*** жизнь - это просветы между ощущение удовлетворения от выполненного дела ремейки собственных стихотворений и проч. узнавать чужие стратегии выживания огромная ревущая миллионами зеркал размноженная интерзона подмигивала мне или просто моргала непонимание зачем притащился случайные неслучайности ценные для героя инсайты.
❤12⚡3❤🔥3
File, posted without a caption
❤🔥3🔥1
2 моих стиша тут! 👾
❤1
ВНОВЕ №2 (2026) Внутри: СТИХИ Дариа Солдо, Глафира Солдатова, Маша Платонова, Иван Сорокин, Николай Милешкин В ГОСТЯХ У ВНОВЕ Андрей Бондаренко о фильме "Поэт" (2025) ВНОВЕ-КЛАССИКА стихи Эдуарда Лимонова В ДВУХ СЛОВАХ финалисты Чемпионата поэзии им. Маяковского (2026) о... Чемпионате поэзии им. Маяковского (2026) КАК ГОВОРИТ... крутое эссе Глафиры Солдатовой о кроликах
❤2⚡1❤🔥1🔥1
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ☀️13 июня в 18:00 в Библиотеке поэзии (Барболина, 6) состоятся поэтические чтения участников мастерской "Автор в лесу" разных потоков. Приходите послушать замечательную поэзию, а заодно познакомиться и обняться. Будут читать: 🌿Анастасия Голованова 🌿Ксения Приходько 🌿Василиса Коваль 🌿Анастасия Миль 🌿Никита Лисогорский 🌿Николь Полак 🌿Татьяна Виноградова-Ян 🌿Лёня Коммьев 🌿Оля Островерх 🌿Иван Сорокин 🌿…
🙏5
В эту субботу буду здееесь
приходите завтра послушать стихи (мои и не мои)🫨👽🙈
❤4
[10 мая [15:59] Чтения Внове] В честь выхода первого номера журнала мы приглашаем вас почитать вместе! Впервые у нас: Вячеслав Барымов Екатерина Божидай Максим Глазун Фëдор Ильин Кристина Степченкова Андрей Першин Николай Синехог Степан Соколин Глафира Солдатова Дариа Солдо Иван Сорокин Александр Судаев Сёма Ткаченко Ирина Чуднова Андрей Чхалов а также ждем наших друзей, участников прошлых чтений! Ваши Внове и ре…
❤4❤🔥3
Оказывается Леня Коммьев написал рецензию на мою поэму 🥹
🥰5
"я это то что у меня между ног", Иван Сорокин пытаясь сделать вид что я больше чем есть на самом деле Иван Сорокин – следователь творчеству Олега Юрьева. Хотя как лирический герой поэмы преследует самого себя. И в этом смысле на пути его самообнаружения находимся мы (как участники по-дурацки социального, полового, эволюционного, и другого) процесса. О непрерывности, единстве этого процесса говорит поэтическая оторв…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sorokinastichi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,192,360 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@anydest · 761 postхрусталики глаз звенят | дариа солдо
@crystallines_tinkle · 3051 postИван Сорокин читает «Новый мир»
@ivansorokinchitaetnoviymir · 381 postЛапничный Климбаторий
@klimbatoriy · 1971 postлесные авторы
@lesnieavtory · 4021 postБиблиотека поэзии
@poetlib · 1,2791 postневеста неместа
@strawberryshortcakebrainfire · 2151 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@sorokinastichi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сорокина стихи” (@sorokinastichi), 119 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sorokinastichi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.